The tale of Oedipus and his prophecy has intrigued not only the citizens of Greece in the ancient times, but also people all over the world for several generations. Most notable about the play was its peculiar structure, causing the audience to think analytically about the outcomes of Oedipus’ actions and how it compares with Aristotle’s beliefs. Another way that the people have examined the drama is by looking at the paradoxes (such as the confrontation of Tiresias and Oedipus), symbols (such as the Sphinx), and morals that has affected their perceptions by the end of the play. Nonetheless, the most important aspect is how relevant the story is and how it has influenced modern ideas like that of Freud and other people of today. As …show more content…
Oedipus displayed his faulty character throughout the play by showing how he is filled with ill-temper and pride, especially during his confrontation with Apollo’s blind prophet, Tiresias. He allowed his own hubris to take over him, eventually leading to his disaster at the end of the story. Now, some critics may argue that Oedipus did not actually go through a downfall in the play, but when looking back at the definition of a tragic hero, it can be seen that there are evidence to prove that Oedipus is a tragic hero. For Aristotle, a tragic hero has a hamartia (or tragic flaw) that leads to his own downfall, and so there is no argue that Oedipus undergoes a downfall in the play. But was he to be blamed for the circumstances he encountered in his life? The answer could go either way. As argued by Jocasta, “It’s all chance/ chance rules our lives. Not a man on earth/ can see a day ahead…Better to live at random, best we can” (Oedipus the King, 1068-1071). Drawing from the quotation about chances, Oedipus might have ended up in his situation not because of a future prediction, but rather as a result of coincidence. Moreover, what was important to acknowledge about Jocasta’s statement is that she said how it is better to live the “best we can”, which was something that Oedipus ended up ignoring. Even though he knows that the truth would ruin him, he
As the play progresses, however, the audience could observe the tragic flaw in Oedipus’ character – the arrogance, excessive pride, and persistence that leads to ineffective decision-making. Most importantly, his persistence on knowing the truth leads to decisions that cause his destruction.
King uses strong visual imagery to compare Jack and Ullman’s positions in the power structure. When Jack first meets Ullman he describes his suit as being reassuring to the customers. However he thinks, "To the hired help it spoke more curtly: this had better be good you” (1). Jack describes Ullman’s suit as being very demanding. The word "spoke" personifies a suit, giving it more power. The suits demanding presence also portrays Ullman’s dominance over his employees. Ullman's suit is described as dark, perhaps the color black. The color black holds holds a great significance. Ullman tells Jack how, “ This year the overlooks accounts were written in black ink for the first time in almost 7 decades” (9). The color black translates into success,
Aristotle, Ancient Greek philosopher whom did a lot of philosophizing, he believed in a logical reality. Aristotle’s objective was to come up with a universal process of reasoning that would allow man to learn every imaginable thing about reality. The initial process involved describing objects based on their characteristics, states of being and actions. Aristotle once said "A man doesn 't become a hero until he can see the root of his own downfall”. Oedipus was a mythical Greek king of Thebes. Oedipus is in fact a tragic hero. Aristotle uses six different points to define a tragic hero. (1)The tragic hero must be of noble stature and have greatness. (2)Though the tragic hero pre-eminently great, he or she is not perfect. (3)The hero 's downfall is their own fault. (4) The hero’s misfortune is not fully deserved and the punishment exceeds the crime. (5)The fall is not a pure loss. (6) And though it arouses solemn emotion tragedy does not leave the audience in a state of depression. Using Aristotle definition of a tragic hero, I will show that in Oedipus in “Oedipus the King” is in fact a tragic hero; hence, how his decisions led to his downfall. Oedipus is a man of high standing (king of Thebes) intellectually (he 's a great solver of riddles) and morally he is determined to find the murderer and to end the plague of his people). His quest to find the murderer described by
Sophocles’ Oedipus the King encompasses the ideas of fate and fortune into the tragic story of the ignorant Oedipus. Scholar Bernard Knox says that Oedipus’ fall was caused by “attributes of divinity- knowledge, certainty, and justice.” Oedipus’ fall was caused by the absence of knowledge, uncertainty, and anger, which led him to show injustice. He had absence of knowledge because he did not know the truth, he had uncertainty because he acted without certainty, and he showed anger when Teiresias would not tell him the truth, which led him to display injustice to Creon.
Oedipus the king written by sophecles when read for the first time the reader will realize that the audience already knows what is going to happen its just the way that the characters deal will with it. There is an oracle that says that Oedipus will kill his father and marry his mother.
Irony is “incongruity between the actual results of a sequence of events and the normal or expected results (Merriam – Webster).” This means that a person may think that something is going to happen based on what they see or what they believe, when in reality the exact opposite happens. Irony can be further specified as dramatic or tragic irony. These types of irony often occur in plays, stories, and movies; where viewers or readers are led in one direction and director or author reveals different results than what is expected. The sudden twists and turns create drama and keep people interested thus, deserving the name dramatic irony.
The Greek play, Oedipus the King, shows how easy it is for a man to fall apart, while trying to make things right. Sophocles’ tragedy tells the story of Oedipus, a regular man turned king of Thebes. Throughout the tragedy, Oedipus searches for the cause of the chaos and havoc encompassing his land; however, he discovers that he is the one responsible for the hardships plaguing Thebes. As the tragedy continues, Sophocles’ exposes a dark side to power, fame, and ambition. Further, Sophocles’ exposes the fear that many have of the truth, and exposes the grave danger in hiding from it.
Oedipus was a thoughtful king in the book Oedipus Rex written by Sophocles. Before Oedipus was born, Laius and Jocasta (Parents of Oedipus, King and Queen of Thebes) went to go see Apollo. Reason being, they wanted to talk to Apollo to see what future was ahead for their family. He told them that their baby (Oedipus) would end up killing his father Laius and marrying his mother Jocasta. Them hearing such awful news, they pierced his feet together and gave him to a servant/shepherd to leave him in the woods to die. Baby Oedipus was given to another shepherd, from corinth, out of pity and was then given to his adoptive parents, Polybus and Merope (King and Queen of Corinth).
Aristotle says that “a tragic event involves a fall from greatness, brought about, at least partially, by the agent’s free action.” Oedipus’s demise is attributed to his pride and uncontrolled anger. Oedipus ran from his home in fear of a prophecy that he would not have fulfilled if he had stayed. He let his anger blind him and unknowingly killed his biological father on the road. “I struck him in my rage...I killed him. I killed them all.” Oedipus kills Laios, and everyone with him, over being asked to move out of the way to let the king pass. His anger issues would not immediately qualify Oedipus as a tragic hero, but when combined with his noble stature and his morals, he begins to fit Aristotle’s description. A summary of Aristotle’s writing states, “The combination of the hero’s greatness and his responsibility for his own downfall is what entitles us to describe his downfall as tragic rather than as merely pathetic” (pg. 1253). Oedipus’s high stature as a compassionate king as well as his own personal mistakes is what makes his demise
“The only thing worse than being blind, is having sight with no vision”. This quote by American author Helen Keller perfectly captures the main characters journey in the play Oedipus the king by Sophocles. In this play the reader finds out that to see the truth one does not have to have eyes but have an open mind. The reader learns this through the quest the main character takes to solve a mystery in his kingdom. The main character, Oedipus is the king of a Greek city called Thebes who was from Corinth. He came to Thebes because there was prophecy stating that he would kill his father and marry is mother, so he left for Thebes where he solved the riddle and took the crown. While Oedipus was the kings, the city of Thebes fell into bad times
Oedipus the King: Literary Analysis Essay Sophocles was one of the great classical Athens’ playwrights, creating dramas to not only captivate but also to deliver a message, wisdom being the main idea behind most of his tragedies. In Sophocles’s Oedipus the King, the plot was driven by Oedipus’s ignorance towards his prophecies. Because of his ignorance he acted on impulse rather than finding the truth, therefore, creating an iron barrier around himself, trapping the image of an heroic and innocent savior to the people of Thebes. Oedipus is used to portray the lack of truth due to blindness by putting up a shield of ignorance.
Although Oedipus the King was written by Sophocles when the Ancient Greek civilization was at its peak, far before the textbook you will read it from was created, its ideas and themes can still be applicable. Despite being far older than the simple platitude, one theme of Sophocles’ tragedy is perhaps best explained with the phrase “ignorance is bliss”. Oedipus the King also has a second theme, people pick and choose what they want to believe as it suits them. Both themes, developed through the symbolism and irony throughout the tragedy, cause us to question our own pursuits and beliefs, making it a story worth examining further.
Oedipus did not have a fair start in life. His father, Laius, heard prophecy that Oedipus would one day kill his father and sleep with his mother. In order to prevent this, Laius gave Oedipus to a shepherd to be killed. Fortunately, through a string of events, Oedipus's life was saved, and he even went on to become the honored king of Thebes. Despite this feat, Oedipus still managed to make several decisions that ultimately fulfilled the original prophecy told to Laius, and inevitably sealed Oedipus?s fate.
Sophocles’ play, King Oedipus is a perfect example of a clear Aristotelian tragedy. In fact, it was so perfect that Aristotle himself considered it the ideal tragedy. An Aristotelian tragedy is “serious action in a dramatic text that portrays incidents arousing pity and fear, causing catharsis in the audience.” Aspects of a tragedy include a tragic hero, who is neither good nor bad, who has a hamartia which causes him to ignore a divine warning or violate a moral law. A common example of hamartia is hubris, or pride. A tragedy is also often accompanied by a peripeteia, which is when the tragic hero has a sudden change of fortune. The tragic hero moves us to pity and also to fear, by showing us how what happened to him could happen to us as
"Oedipus the King" is a tragic play showing a shift from the belief of fate to freedom of choice. Therefore, Oedipus the king is a great example of those who run from fate ends up fulfilling their fate