Analysis of President Obama’s Speech in Cairo, Egypt Essay

2106 Words 9 Pages
President Obama’s speech, given on June 4, 2009 in Cairo, Egypt, was a current event everyone who lives in the U.S. should be aware of considering almost all of us as a nation were affected by the events of September 11th, 2001. Obama’s speech was fantastic in many ways, but especially because someone with little to no political knowledge could understand the message clearly. His points were apparent and presented eloquently. The reasons the talk was so effective and listenable is directly related to who and where he spoke, the simple yet extremely efficient structure, the support content of the speech, and the delivery method tied to his language used.
Obama’s Cairo speech shows his high level of listenability. Listenability is a term
…show more content…
To dive a little deeper into the reason why Obama chose the University specifically is when he states, “Al-Azhar has stood as a beacon of Islamic learning, and for over a century, Cairo University has been a source of Egypt's advancement (Press Secretary).” Learning and advancement are the key terms to this statement. The idea is that a younger and educated audience is more likely to listen to both sides before shutting down diverse philosophies. One of Obama’s goals was to advance the relationship between the US and Egypt that some say has been damaged for decades and debatably longer (Freedland). Using the word advancement points out that Egypt is an evolving society of people who are progressive and tolerant. O’Brien points out that a speaker who figures out who and what the audience is all about creates a sense of worth and trust to him or herself. By doing the right research, a speaker can maximize the impact of the message and avoid the possibility of damaging his/her ethos by stating something potentially offensive (112-114). The level of audience analysis is distinct throughout the entirety of Obama’s speech. However, before he spoke, it resonated with the choice of where and with whom to have the exchange.
A common misconception is that public speaking is like a paper, but in reality is better represented as a conversation. A speech to an audience is structured much
Open Document