Analysis of Two Articles on Leadership of Businesses Essay

Good Essays
The purpose of this review is to summarise, analyse and synthesise two authors’ arguments. Maak and Pless (2009) in Business leaders as citizens of the world. Advancing humanism on a global scale and Thomas (2010) in the Global moral compass for business leaders.
This paper reviews complex challenges facing the world and business leaders today. It describes how the worlds pressing problems can be resolved in other to make the environment a more sustainable place. Maak and Pless (2009) claims that it takes a responsible, global and cosmopolitan mindset to improve the values of humanity on a global scale. This is to say that the world needs a global leader that can be depended upon by taking responsibilities for the pressing problems
…show more content…
Although business leaders ought to contribute in building a more sustainable environment, they shouldn’t be blamed for the global public problems Maak and Pless (2009). Therefore the world needs responsible leaders who care about the welfare of other humans to make the world a better place. To buttress this point, it has been suggested that leaders need to be educated to value human beings and environment more than material things in other to embrace sustainability ( Jones and Miller 2010:5).
Maak and Pless (2010:538) refer to the work of Lodge and Wilson (2006) which argues that stakeholders expect little or nothing from business leaders based on the assumption that they have been reluctant in the past towards making contribution in solving the world’s pressing problems. As a result of this assumption some developments have been set up which indicates that business leaders and multinational corporations are now stimulated to make contributions towards a sustainable future and ready to take part in assisting the less privileged . In my opinion, the economy would be at rest knowing fully well that business leaders and multinationals have their interests at heart. Also, Thompson (2010) develops a unifying framework of moral compass as being accessible in order to understand the morality (right and wrong) of humans. She therefore suggests that leaders engage people in a shared wisdom tradition culture, ethnicity and religion of
Get Access