The duty to warn refers to a psychologist notifying a potential third party or governing authorities of the danger that might be inevitable. The duty to warn goes together with the duty to protect a third party whose life might be in danger. The therapist has a legal role to play by protecting a third party from danger through hospitalization and outpatient therapy while still observing confidentiality. However, the duty to warn might require the confidentiality to be overlooked. Duty to warn refers to warning an individual but not the public. When a person threatens the public, they should not be notified even if the danger gets noted. A psychologist has a role to play in every client’s life.
An example is when a person threatens to…show more content… The confidentiality and additional intervention such as treatment get disregarded in such a case. The problem gets realized when one seeks to find guidelines on how severe the harm should be before a clinical therapist decides to breach confidentiality. Legislation insists that the danger should be clear and imminent before breaking the confidentiality. This guideline can be interpreted differently by people and in different cultures. For some people, abusing a child is a danger and to others it means a much severe action getting taken against a child.
Therapists get legally allowed to warn others of potential dangers. This article should expound on how this can be done, and when the need should be identified by clinician. An ethical decision has to be made by an individual when they decide to exercise their duty to warn. Duty to warn allows the counselors, and psychological therapists to breach confidentiality when a person endangers life of another. The clinical therapists cannot be prosecuted for warning a third party of imminent danger or if they unreasonably suspect the patient might harm themselves. Initially, the therapist had no right to disclose the content of their discussions to another party until Tarasoff got killed.
Duty to warn is one of the most important concepts in social work field after Tafasoff’s case since it assists in making decisions in other disciplines. The potential victims should be protected