Analyze the reasons for separatism with and/or across national boundaries and discuss its consequences

This therefore brings power closer to the Scottish people, through the Scottish Parliament, but in hand it takes power away from the English people. This may be because there is no purely English devolved body in comparison to the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly and Northern Ireland Assembly. Power is also brought closer to the people as devolved bodies can hold referendums; however, on the other hand, they are limited on what they can hold referendums about.


In 1979, The Scots become asked whether they wanted a Scottish parliament or not, 52% of voters said they did—but the number was too low to accept it. Years went by, the and in 1997, over 74% of Scots voted for a parliament, which become duly formed. In 1999 Scotland got its own parliament. England still holds Scotland in an iron grip, because even though they have their own parliament, they don’t have the right to say much. Scotland getting its own government, gave them a little taste of

With this basic understanding of cultural differences between French-Canadians and Anglo-Canadians we can start to see the reasoning behind the separatist movement. Countries and nations may have at one time or another found themselves trying to decipher who they are. Cultural and civic nations are just two terms used to loosely define a country. Cultural nations are described as a nation with shared genealogy, traditional culture and heritage; placing emphasis on traditional values and customs. Whereas civic nations contrast, and are described by status, political institutions, and principles that are universally shared regardless of

Racial separatism is the belief, most of the time based on racism, that different races should remain segregated and apart from one another. Racism is the belief that a particular race is superior or inferior to another, that his or she predetermines a person's social and moral traits and born biological characteristics. The introduction of these terms produces racial discrimination within a society. Racial discrimination has been a thorn in the side of yesterdays, today's and future generations because of its adverse effect on critical areas of one's life such as healthcare, economics, wealth and social media. Racial discrimination whether indirect or direct is a part of life that is constantly being battled with on a daily basis.

The recent Scottish referendum played a pivotal role in the Scottish economy, while many people believed the 300-year old union is no longer fit for purpose and is holding Scotland back others believed that Scotland cannot thrive without the UK and the economic and social problems caused by Independence would be disastrous. In this essay I will explore Scotland’s position in Europe and how whether obtaining independence would have been an advantage or disadvantage to Scotland.

The overall goal of partition is to eliminate conflict and produce long-lasting safety via the separation of the conflicting communities (Kaufmann as cited in Tir 265). Safety is in the form of the removal of threats relating to ethnic murder, expropriation, or expulsion (Kaufmann as cited in Tir 265). As, in situations where ethnic communities do not have a strong and impartial centralized state, ethnic groups in fear of upcoming civil conflict rally together and become defensive (Posen as cited in Kauffman 122). Furthermore, this creates a security dilemma, as ethnic groups cannot provide for their own safety and security without undermining the safety and security of other groups (Posen as cited in Kauffman 122). This dilemma stems from

Independence is something being fought for in many countries today. Hen autonomy is no longer enough to preserve and protect countries seek to separate themselves. Both Catalonia and Scotland have some rights to have autonomy, but are seeking to separate from their larger nations to better serve the needs of their people and preserve their culture. “Catalonia has been granted a great deal of control over its own affairs, including transportation, commerce, culture and safety” (Knowledge). Although this may be the case Catalonia is financially dependent on Spain and does not have the legal right to completely self-govern, set their own taxes, etc. Similarly, Scotland is also dependent on the United Kingdom. With both nations having thier own

If Scotland is independent, it would have less influence in the world. The UK has a permanent place in the United Nations Security Council and is one of the largest member states in the European Union. Thus, anti-independence campaigners say an independent Scotland would inevitably hold less sway. They question whether an independent Scotland would be accepted into the Nato and say that its membership of the EU would only come with strict

Even in the 1700s when Scotland joined England as a political union, the Scottish Parliament dissolved, and the representatives were sent to the Parliament in Westminster. Today, Scotland maintains less than 70 seats in Parliament, while England has over 500. According to those voting yes, becoming independent would give Scotland the chance to have a more representative government. Voting yes would also improve Scottish economy with a smaller income gap, because the United Kingdom has a large one. This is partially due to the UK’s assumption of funds profited from oil in Scotland. As an independent nation, Scotland would be able to keep the funds from it’s own oil rather than have it account for the UK’s money, and refine public finances. With more jobs as a result of rising energy and electricity, the Yes Scotland campaign along with Alex Salmond, the group’s leader and former leader of the Scottish National Party, argued that Scotland would be able to efficiently lower the wage gap if

Separation is also a cause of war, for example, civil wars have happened all around the world in order to break apart a governing body.

Those in support of independence wanted to focus more on the needs of Scotland, and decisions that would reflect more primarily on its priorities. The people feel by putting Scotland’s priorities first, the confidence in the country and its abilities would then be increased. Additionally, Scotland could get rid of Trident (nuclear submarines located at HMNB Clyde, service headquarters in

If independent, non-supporters would argue that the country would be in debt, in which they have to pay more than €10 billion in year interest alone. In opposition to Independence supporters, Scotland is having a negative growth rate with 2,000 more deaths than births in the mid-2014s to mid-2015s, which means that Scotland could have a smaller population in the future.

When people reach a certain age, they begin to want to be independent from their parents and become self-sustaining. The same can be said of a country living dependently of one another. Scotland has reached the age when it wants to be its own country, independent from mother England. Independence can only be achieved when one is fully capable of taking care of themselves on their own. That cannot be said of Scotland or England. Since the two countries first united they have formed a codependent relationship. Their economies formed off of each other and even use the same currency. Nevertheless, the Scots who want independence are justified in their pursuit. Patriotism for one's nation instills a sense of pride in the citizens and makes them

The Scottish had a rather large to make. Both independence from and dependence on the United Kingdom have their advantages and disadvantages. If argued in the point of view of Scotland, there are many pros for the whole kingdom. The first advantage is in the government. The Scottish Parliament is more democratic than the

Perhaps the most sociably notable aspect of the globalised world is the increasingly diversified ethnic makeup of nation-states. Whereas in the past states were typically centred around one majority ethnicity, today’s world instead requires us to address the needs of many different cultures within a single country, a challenge best addressed by the federal principle. As the ability for international travel has increased in the last half century, the attractiveness of higher wages and a better standard of living has drawn many away from their nations of birth , a process aided by the need for labour in many of the wealthier, particularly western, nations. This has created large minority populations, who are also often centralized to specific locations, which, due to the continuing dominance of the majority ethnic group in national government, remain poorly represented. This is an issue addressed by the federal principle as the decentralization of power allows for greater participation by minority groups and, in areas where they form the majority, for them to hold far more autonomy than is possible in other systems.