Analyzing Erikson's Socioemotional Development

INTRODUCTION: An individual is made up of his or her frames of reference. Our social interactions and beliefs are all a reflection of our surroundings, environment, things we hear, feel or touch. A frame of reference can simply be defined as “The context, viewpoint, or set of presuppositions or of evaluative criteria within which a person's perception and thinking seem always to occur, and which constrains selectively the course and outcome of these activities" therefore one can say, Gender, Age, Religion, Environment, Education, Occupation, Political Class, Family and Press are the common determinants of individual frames of reference.

How is Laura’s behavior indicative of role confusion as discussed by Erik Erikson’s model of psychosocial development? Laura’s family come from a traditional catholic background to which she cannot relate. When Laura is trying to establish her identity in this world, her family is constantly comparing her to brother who

Erik Erikson was born in Frankfurt, Germany in 1902. Because his mother was Jewish and his father was not, he was often bullied in school. He had blonde hair and blue eyes, so his Jewish peers mocked him for standing out and being different, and his peers at school teased

Eric Erikson was one of the most famous theorists of the twentieth century; he created many theories. One of the most talked about theories is his theory of psychosocial development. This is a theory that describes stages in which an individual should pass as they are going through life. His

Since the development of Erik Erikson’s psychosocial model of development in the 1960s, it has become one of the most widely used measurements for studying emotional and personality development across the human lifespan (Dunkel & Harbke, 2017). Erikson’s model contains eight developmental stages, beginning in infancy and progressing until old age, and as a person ages they begin to pass through the stages, with a new psychological crisis arising at each stage (Svetina, 2014). Whitbourne, Sneed and Sayer (2009) describe how the outcome of each crisis is met with identity attainment and new personal adaptations (positive outcome), or with an incoherent identity (negative outcome). Additionally, each new stage allows for the reassessment of previous achievements, and in some cases, failures (Dunkel & Harbke, 2017). Erikson’s model is commonly recognised as a developmental ladder – each previous stage lays a foundation before an individual can progress toward the next stage (Malone, Liu, Valliant, Rentz & Waldinger, 2016). It is important to note that whilst they are referred to as “stages”, they should be viewed as being on a continuum rather than fixed categories (Dunkel & Harbke, 2017).

Well, Erikson dedicated his time investigating the development of a child to adulthood. During that process, he recognizes the importance of the first four stages of the life cycle, simply because they are the “prerequisites in physiological growth, mental maturation, and social responsibility to experience and pass through the crisis of identity.” (d’Heurle & Tash, 2004, Pg. 255) Those stages are imperative for his growth, without them, his future could possibly look bleak; ultimately, become troublesome. (d’Heurle & Tash, 2004, Pg. 259) The others were equally important and slightly more reliant on the earlier teachings, which will also prepare the child for either an accomplished life and a hopelessly, depressed and despair life.

In Erik Erikson’s theory he explains that in every stage, a positive or a negative attitude is developed within an individual. During our developing stages we are either successful or we fail. Each stage will come to us whether or not we’re ready for them or not. You can think of the stages as learning stages where crisis occur .Only if we have learned from the previous crisis we are successful. You cannot avoid 1 stage and move to a next stage because of the developing process. The outcome of our lives depends on the way we chose to progress throughout each stage in life. Erikson had his own way in describing each stage in life that we all must go through.

Erik Erikson developed a psychosocial theory that identifies a series of eight stages, in which a healthy individual should pass through. The individual must overcome or resolve successfully at each of the stages to adjust well to the environment. This paper will focus on the Erikson’s stage “ego integrity versus despair,” which is where most geriatric clients are. Erikson believed most patients who entered the stage of “ego integrity versus despair” fall into despair and are dissatisfied with life, often leading to depression and hopelessness. Fortunately, the client I am about to discuss made it to the integrity portion of his life. I will discuss the factors that promoted his journey to integrity, and how I altered my nursing care to better

Erikson's Psychosocial Theory is the one that would stick with me the most. Lot of it makes sense because with the different stages he's mentioned such as trust vs mistrust, identity vs role confusion, intimacy versus isolations to integrity vs despair. The trust vs mistrust sticks because of some of the stories and clips that was in class. With trust vs mistrust the idea is if a child has bad things happen in certain situations the child will begin to mistrust. While for trust if positive reinforcement is established the child begins to develop self control and learns to redirect there feelings or emotions. In one video about an abused girl she was redirecting her anger toward her baby brother which came from the mistrust of her abuser.

Erik Erikson believed that each of his stages is dependent upon each other and we have to solve the conflict before progressing to the next stage. Despite Erikson’s beliefs, is it possible for a person to start on a different stage first? Does the adolescence only have identity cohesion or role confusion as an adaptive and maladaptive way to cope with the issues in life? Is there a possibility that the adolescence needs to find intimacy and generativity in order to discover their role in life? Another question that I thought about was how does Erikson’s stages of development affect personality? How much relation does the stages have in according to a person’s personality?

Psychoanalyst Erik Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development explains how the human identity develops and evolves in eight stages from birth to death. Each one occurs in a predetermined order; the current stage builds upon the previous one and lays the groundwork for future stages (Wikimedia). Each stage has

The theory of human development that I believe accurately accounts for human development is Erik Erikson's psychoanalytic theory of psychosocial development comprising of eight distinct stages from infancy to adulthood. According to his theory, successful completion of each stage results in a healthy personality and successful interactions with others although each stage has a challenge or crisis that must be resolved before going to another stage. Erikson's theory was similar to Sigmund Freud’s theory. Erikson believed that personality develops in a series of stages.

People begin to change the priorities of certain aspects in their lives as they age. In late adulthood, people are keeping family and friendships closer than at other times in their lives. Friendships have a great impact in late adulthood mental health (Berk, 2010, p.473). One of the theories that focus in late adulthood is Erikson’s theory of development. It is a theory based on how people develop their identity in a series of stages from infancy to adulthood. The last stage in Erikson’s theory is called ego integrity versus despair. In this final stage, people look back on their past accomplishments in their lives to either accept their satisfaction in the past life or feel regret and despair on the goals they could have accomplished. The ones that succeed in this stage of life are satisfied with their accomplishments and they will feel that they’ve lived a well life. In this stage of life, people will go through different emotions ranging from peacefulness to loneliness. They will have to decide whether or not to rise above the conflicts that come with negative emotions.

In the early 20th-century, interest in the field of child development emerged. Researchers and theorists studied the ways in which children grew, learned, and, in some instances, were shaped by societal influences (Weiland, 1993). The study of child development enables us to appreciate and understand the social, emotional, physical, educational, and cognitive growth that children go through from birth to early adulthood. Grand theories attempt to organize and arrange concepts and aspects of development using a step approach. Such as that of Erik Erikson’s theory, the Psychosocial Identity Development theory, in which he addresses the development of personal, emotional, and social progression in an individual through stages (Pretorius et al., 2015). Erikson’s model for the approach of development involves the focus of overcoming conflicts that individuals encounter over the span of their childhood that influence their ego identity, or the conscious sense of self that develops and constantly changes due to new experiences and information that is acquired through daily interactions with others and events. In Erikson’s theory, he believed that each person experienced a conflict that served as a defining moment in their development that essentially shaped who they would become later on in life; he believed that unresolved problems of adult life echoed unresolved conflicts of one’s childhood (Berger, 2011).

No matter who you are I believe that everyone will go through stages in their life that will get them to where they are on today. I am a person who has a very interesting story; this is the first time it will be told in full. We were asked