Analyzing The Introductory Paragraph

To begin with, after reading the comments given to me by my fellow classmates; I noticed that some of my classmates didn’t like the idea of jumping straight into book without a brief description. In other words, they felt that I needed to provide an introduction to my paper and make my thesis clear in the beginning, rather than stating it on the second page. With that in mind, and since the readers pretended like they never read the books before, I decided to take some sentences out and rearrange the order of the first two pages. In addition to this, it bothered me that all the response forms interpreted my thesis statement differently, which meant my thesis wasn’t clear to the readers. Granted that some of the readers understood what I was trying to do, I decided to rephrase my thesis and try to make it as clear as possible that way they know early on what this paper incorporates.

Finding an introductory paragraph that hooks the reader can be troublesome, but throughout the course, I have spent considerable time developing that technique. The body of my arguments each exhibit strong support for the thesis. In addition, my conclusions summarize the papers without restating unnecessary information. Overall, my comprehension of the basic format of an argument has proved to be a valuable asset.

-The organization of the essay is terrific. The essay starts with introductions on those negative depiction, and soon the author declares her statement and opinion, followed by persuasive evidences and arguments distinguished clearly.

To be clear, the intent of this essay is not to argue for or against the content; instead, we are analyzing what the article does in terms of the following:

a. Is there some section that clearly lets the reader know what subject the composition is about and what the writer’s purpose is? If so, where does this section begin and end? In this section, can you find an answer to the central question that the text has been written in response to, or can you find an indication of the text’s central argument?

4. The paper must logically develop the thesis in a way that leads to the conclusion, and that development must be supported by facts, fully

A few areas that the writing specialist pointed out in which I need to review and refresh. 1. Fully

Hunger. Emptiness. Death. In the novel Night by Elie wiesel speaks about hunger as something all jews were used to, empty and deprived of nutrition they were already dead. Hunger consumes all hope and love that people have with one another.

The first body paragraph should be the weakest or simplest way to get the overall point of the essay across to the readers. This will be the foundation of all three points,

The paper starts off with an introduction, which then leads to a thesis, which is followed by additional information and a conclusion. The overall view and layout of the article are portrayed in a manner that is appealing to the eye. However, the paper does have its faults in the organization and in context to the overall subject manner. For example, Peter A. Coclanis and Stanley L. Engerman do not claim their thesis until approximately halfway through the entire article. The two authors provide a wide area of background information to support their thesis, but a part of it is not really supportive and is what causes their thesis to be pushed so far into the article.

What was the author’s main thesis in this chapter? How well he or she support it in terms of sources? How compelling was the author’s argument?

The fifthteenth paragraph takes the reader from personal reflection to reconsideration, to general conclusion. Before the show, Dillard “thought she know my [her] way around beauty…” but then reconsiders that on that day at the airport, she had only “begun learning about beauty.” By the end, she concludes that there is “nothing...more gladdening that knowing we must...move back the boundaries of the humanly possible…” She includes these transforming detail in order to inform her audience of the journey of learning that she traveled upon. This also works to strengthen her ethos, because to her audience, she becomes a well-rounded person that is willing to accept change for the better.

The first changes I have made was to applying a WHAT in the beginning since I was taught that it was essential to have a WHAT, HOW, and WHY in a paper. It was odd to start a paragraph

I. Introductory Paragraph A. The hook of the introductory paragraph is when the author uses words such as “squawks” and “pings” to grab the readers’ attention. B. The author narrows the reader’s focus by introducing the topic of the article, neuroscience and fiction.

During the analysis of the CBAP, the understanding of writing changed by a hundredfold. Atrocious would be the word to describe the original ideas formed in the CBAP. Also, there are one too many supporting ideas in he CBAP that I did not realize were not allowed. Specific ideas appeared, yet I did not find them as specific as needed. The analysis opened the document, exposed it, and made it more interesting. The Conclusion restates the thesis in a new and creative way, and gives a completed sense to the essay.