The goal of this consulting report is to analyze the strategy for General Motors. To start, a five forces analysis of the automobile industry was conducted. The five forces include the following factors: competition among rivals, threat of new entrants, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and role of complements. Understanding the influence of each of these factors provides insight into the attractiveness of the automobile industry. Such an understanding is necessary for an effective critique of General Motors’ strategy for the future.
Rivalry Among Existing Competitors
The competition among rivals is very high due to price and non-price factors. Companies try to attract customers to their products by introducing
…show more content…
These barriers include, but are not limited to, the following: large established competitors, high capital requirements, limited initial access to distribution networks, and environmental regulations. Due to the existence of massive brand name manufacturers like General Motors and Ford, any new entrants in the automobile industry will be competing with companies benefiting from strong customer loyalty, economies of scale, and impressive marketing budgets. Therefore, new entrants must be able to achieve the difficult task of entering automotive manufacturing at high capacity while simultaneously building a solid consumer base. Such an entry would be quite expensive, especially in conjunction with the billions of dollars needed to construct high-volume manufacturing facilities and develop effective distribution networks to deliver new automobiles. Finally, new entrants must be able to design and manufacture their automobiles according to contemporary environmental regulations. Abiding by such regulations would further drain new entrants’ funds. Overall, entering the automotive industry competitively requires an exorbitant amount of money, so the threat of new entrants is low.
Substitutes & Complements
There are many substitutes for automobiles as well as many substitutes for actually owning a vehicle. Alternatives for cars would be buses, trains, planes, walking,
Porters Five Forces model evaluated Actual competition, Threat of new entrants, Threat of Substitute Products, Bargaining Power of Suppliers, and Bargaining Power of Customers. Actual Competition in the Luxury Recreational Vehicle industry is mixed due to low switching costs, constant growth, and high differentiation among products in the industry. Threat of New entrants in
Threats of substitutes: In U.S., an automobile was considered as necessity so for every adult there was car on roads. Even for inter-city travel more than 70% time cars were used. Buses, trains and other means didn’t have much impact. The growing array of higher priced imported models had negative effect.
Government regulation and patents laws have a major role in this market. The high cost
However, this approach is limited. Due to globalization, lowering cost of production and availability of information, the competition is more fierce some than ever in most industries, putting more pressure on companies and shrinking their profit margins. In this competition race, products and services
Competition within the industry is high and continues to grow as competitors strive to intensify their presence by offering similar
As number of firms in the industry keeps increasing, greater competition force firms to earn more market share, innovate substitutes, produce differentiate products and be cost leadership to keep or improve their position in the industry. For example, some of the products of Billabong and Quiksilver are similar, consumer will choose to buy the one with lower price if they have similar function, or buy the one with higher price if the product is different from others. Thus, a firm could run well if it has different products and lower cost compared with rivals.
Given the current economic climate, I think the automotive industry is going to be faced with a multitude of economic challenges in the next five years. As an oligopoly market, the auto industry is highly dependent on strategic decision-making, and the demand for dynamic innovation and supply at decreased-cost levels. Competition, possibilities of turning substitutes into compliments, and shifts toward higher demand in services are seemingly leading factors that face the current automotive industry in the immediate future. But first, we should not ignore the political forces at play within the market.
One of the most notable outcomes of the competition between Ford and General Motors has been their control of the global automobiles industry. Both companies enjoy have many clients within the United States of America and other parts of the world. This would not have been the case had the two companies not been in direct competition with each other. Whenever Ford introduces a new model in the market, General Motors is always quick to do the same (Ford 14). Similarly, the development of a new model by the latter company serves as a lead for Ford Motor Company to introduce a new brand. This neck-to-neck tussle for the American and global market for automobiles has positively affected the exceptional success of both companies. In most cases, companies tend to view competition with a perception that is more or less negative.
A company would have to use strategies outside of price to lure consumers in such as aggressive advertising, better customer support, market saturation,
In recent years, the global recession has made a huge impact on the company cash flows and its financial situation. To sustain as a global leader in the highly competitive automobile industry the GM needs to have its own strategic plan to produce the next generation of vehicles and it has got no time to delay. This is a crucial time for automobile industry with many threats, but opportunities as well. The company has to choose the best "opportunities" to overcome the "threats" and "weaknesses" using its "strengths". The next several years will redefine
Also, customers who have tried the product earlier may remain loyal. In the face of such opportunity, new competitors will start entering the market and they will introduce new product features and hence, expanding the market, leaving the product's price constant or fall slightly. Here, a company, in order to stay competitive in the market, should keep on promoting its product. In addition, profits start to increase. The firm has several strategies to stay in the rapid growing market as long as possible. Also, the firm improves the product quality, adds more distribution channels, changing the advertising theme - from promoting the product to the market to reminding the market on the availability of the product as well as to increase awareness. The firm also lowers the price in order to attract more buyers.
This study discusses Toyota, General Motors’ (GM), and Tesla Motor’s competitive strategies. These three companies are top leaders in the automotive industry, and this paper focuses on what their current strategies are and how they develop and manage their opportunities. The paper will also address what can impact these three companies, how they protect their company from competitors, and some recommendations for each companies.
The last several years were also tumultuous for the U.S. auto industry. After dominating the market for decades, American automakers had grown complacent about product development. At the same time, rising gas prices and uncertainty about the economy caused consumer preferences to shift from SUVs to more fuel efficient vehicles. Foreign competitors entered the U.S. market offering more reliable, higher quality and more fuel efficient vehicles at a lower price and began to steal market share away from American automakers. In order to remain competitive, U.S. automakers need to focus on increasing production efficiencies and developing innovative product offerings. Firm Analysis
Competition serves as an effective mean for businesses to identify ways to improve product quality, charge lower price, and to increase efficiency. Business that can offer the highest product quality at the reduced costs will succeed in a
There are dynamic changes that have been observed in the corporate world, and this is also evident in General Motors Company. Some of the significant changes include incorporation of certain managerial practices in their daily business activities. The administrative activities include the use of different types of strategic controls in decision-making, application of rewards and incentives for employee motivation, elements of leadership ethics programs, and use of risk mitigation techniques. These strategies have various positive impacts on the general outcome of General Motors Company. These strategies include the points mentioned below.