Anarchy State and Utopia Chapter 7 Summary

In his book Utopia, Thomas More examines a society that seems to be the ideal living situation for human beings. The main thesis of Utopia is his solution to many of the problems that are being faced in English society in the early 16th century.

Although comparing one society to another does not require them to be different in government or human behavior, it does necessarily weight one’s faults against its victories to render it better or worse than the other. This comparative structure, found between Thomas More’s two books of Utopia, poses the country of Utopia opposite the broader communities of world civilization. Despite the comparison of Utopia as distinct from and morally better than widespread society, in truth Utopia is, at best, an extension.

The next day as I walk through the school doors, I see Hunter glaring at me. Remembering what my mom said, I continue walking to class. I go to my first two periods and I read the book Utopia by Thomas Moore through both my classes. When the lunch bell rings, I jump up from my seat and head to the cafeteria where I sit down at my usual table alone. I start eating my peanut butter and jelly sandwich as Hunter and a bunch of his friends enter the cafeteria. I freeze in fear and I start to become enraged. My hands start to shake and my face turns bright red with anger. Without thinking about it, I stand up towering over Hunter. Hunter’s friends begin to laugh at my idiotic decision. I become even more enraged as I hold my hands up in front

The preliminary point into an inquiry of distributive justice is to disconnect the conjunction of “distributive,” and “justice”. For the purpose of this essay, I will inherit and accept John Rawls explanation of justice from A Theory of Justice. “Justice,” according to Rawls, “is the first virtue of social institutions.” Therefore, from a societal perspective, justice as the first virtue negates the utilitarian maxim that a loss of freedom for one would be acceptable if there was a greater good to be shared by others. In a truly just society, all people are treated fair. The questions of individual liberties are taken as settled. In the just society, liberty, rights, and fairness are not subject to a utilitarian calculation nor are they susceptible to political bargaining.

It is hard to engage in the Civil War with one’s own people, and costs more than mere financial or soldiers losses, it rather costs the Americans the bitterness of playing on the national and historical sentiment of existing and belonging together on one land. Still, for Abraham Lincoln it was the only way to grant the forsaken Utopian Nation via banning the secession or whatever means necessary. Since the president first took office, he never saved a breath to accomplish the goals he established for the term as he clarified several times in his letters or in his public speeches. He always stresses on not leave the game of North and South unless he dies or his term ends. Therefore, the process of construction took off as soon as the war was

The author explains to the reader that libertarianism is a doctrine that promotes freedom of the market, low government regulations of capitalism and entrepreneurship, and emphasizing liberty socially as well. Sandel describes those that are qualified for the Forbes 400 which includes Bill Gates, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffet, along with the owner of Walmart. Politics argues whether or not these people deserve the earnings that they have received. Some government regulations have requested that those rich give up a certain amount of their money to be distributed to those that are in need. However, in the libertarian perspective this would be intruding on the individual's right to maximize their personal welfare. Robert Nozick, who wrote Anarchy,

In our lives today, we take advantage of all the luxuries that are presented daily. Freedom alone is one of the greatest luxuries we possess as an American nation. In Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs and Utopia by Thomas Moore, we are presented two life styles, which some might consider very similar in various ways. Both authors focus on a peaceful living lifestyle, to better the people of the nation. Although some of their specific details are different, I believe that Jacobs would definitely approve of the features that More develops in Utopia.

To answer the question, How is the utopian society Anarres structured, one can attack it at many ways. First one can look at the cultural context of the time period in which the novel was written. LeGuin wrote The Dispossessed in 1974. One can argue that the community of Anarres was in inspired by the social movements of the late 1960's and early seventies. The civil rights movement, the feminist movement, the environmental movement, and the 60's counter culture or "hippie" values are all reflected in the culture and society of Anarres.

     Sir Thomas More writes, in his book Utopia, about a society that is perfect in practically ever sense. The people all work an equal amount and everything they need for survival is provided. Most importantly is that everyone living in this perfect society is happy and content with their everyday lives. In this society everybody supports everyone. The community is only as strong as its weakest link. For society to progress everyone must work together. Opponents of the Utopian system, however, feel that the strong should not have to look after the weak. Progress would be maximized if all the resources are spent on the people most qualified to help society. A Utopian society, as perfect as the one

Firchow, Peter Edgerly. "George Orwell's Dystopias: From Animal Farm to Nineteen Eighty-Four." Bloom's Literature. Facts On File, Inc. Web. 11 Mar. 201

Anarchy in every sense of the word is the disruption of order and a lack of power. To descend into anarchy is only one option among many when attempting to bring attention to an issue. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. found that inciting change meant facing those that committed injustices. He wanted to raise awareness about the issues in a non-violent manner, such as marching in protest and public speeches. He saw this as a more effective way to inform the masses of the injustices committed against African Americans. He did not support anarchy. Complete anarchy, then and now, would result in chaos in our nation, but with this being said, an orderly non-violent disruption can raise awareness and create change.

Anarchy: a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society (Dictionary). The question I pose is, will and can anarchy ever work in our world?

As part of his book, Anarchy, State and Utopia, Nozick puts forward his theory of the minimal state. He argues that individuals in a state of nature would voluntarily form protective agencies to ensure that their rights are effectively defended. Because of network effects and economies of scale, one of the agencies will eventually achieve a dominant position where it would have the right to suppress the activities of the other agencies. There is the need to suppress these activities because they would subject the clients of the dormant agency to the risk of rights violation. This prohibition will be effective provided the dominant agency compensates the disadvantaged parties by according them with the protection of their rights. After this has occurred there will be a single firm holding

This contrasts with the work of Robert Nozick, who in his book, In Anarchy, State, and Utopia, offers a libertarian response to Rawls. In A Theory of Justice, Rawls makes the assumption that the equal distribution of resources is the collective desire of society. He maintains that inequality is only right if it is used to avoid a greater injustice to society. However, Nozick points out that resources are produced by people and that people have rights to the things they produce. This is in Nozick's first principle of his Entitlement Theory, which states that a person is entitled to their possession due to just acquisition (Nozick 61). Essentially if one works to earn something or make it themselves, then it is theirs, and it would be unjust

As anarchy is one of the most debated cases in the International Relations study, many philosopher and scientist argue about the word ‘Anarchy’. In Wendt’s journal “Anarchy is what states make of it”, Alexander Wendt conveys that anarchy does not by chance lead to a self-help system (Wendt A. , 1992). The term anarchy comes from the Greek, 'anarchia', which means 'absence of authority'. Generally, we can define Anarchy as the condition where there is no sovereignty, the rules that disappeared because of the absence of authority. The Cambridge English Dictionary defines the word anarchy as ‘a situation in which there is no organization and control, especially in society, because there is no effective government’. George C. Lewis states that “Anarchy is one of the vaguest and ambiguous words in language” .