preview

Anderson's Discrimination In The Inner City

Good Essays

A third way Anderson describes how discrimination affects those in the inner city is the discrimination against hiring those who live there some workplaces have. Part of the reason the concept of family has deteriorated in the inner city, besides the increase of drugs and drug dealing, is because it is hard for a young man to provide for his family. Those who are in the “decent” group have to fight against the stereotypes set forth by those part of the “street” group and have to essentially be a public relations manager for the rest of his street. Those who want a job must deliberately contradict stereotypes as companies are hesitant to hire people from the inner city, even discriminating against whole districts and refusing to hire anyone …show more content…

It is not the migration of jobs and respect becoming the new social currency that he argues for as reasons for increased difficulties in inner city life, but instead he states that he believes the introduction of crack cocaine to the general public that led to the deterioration of inner city neighborhoods. While Anderson mentions crack cocaine when talking about the reasons why grandparents often get custody, he does not attribute this to the prevalence of violence among the neighborhood. However, Dave Kopel also cites the lack of stable families in the inner city as another factor that led to the rise in violence, which is something that Anderson would most likely agree with (Kopel). While a study done by the government does not specifically mention respect of the reasoning for escalation of violence, they do have statistics stating that “several studies have shown that aggressive children tend to be hypersensitive to cues of threat, selectively attend to aggressive cues, and overlook other situational factors that may have influenced the person’s behavior” (Cooley-Strickland, 2009). This corresponds with Anderson’s statements that actions that people do not consider disrespectful or threatening in other locations, might be misconstrued as a prelude to a physical attack in the inner city (Location …show more content…

Some studies even agree with the motives, merely labeling it street cred instead of respect. However, there were no articles that completely agreed with the motivations that Anderson postulated. Despite this, the fact that Anderson could neatly tie up the actions of the people, and the other articles agreed with his accounts about the frequency of those actions, suggests that his theory is valid, or at the very least,

Get Access