Andrea A Lunsford Chapter 3 Summary

In Chapter Seven, Wollstonecraft deeply discusses the idea of modesty and its overall meaning. She argues that modesty is different than humility and bashfulness, and that it is a virtue instead of a quality. She also discusses how modesty contributes to the idea of sexual pleasure, and how that differs from both men and women.

The first chapter introduced the reader to the art of rhetoric. He describes how rhetoric works through real life examples. He demonstrates ways that rhetoric persuades us like, argument from strength, and seduction. He tells the reader that the sole purpose of arguing is to persuade the audience. He showed that the chief purpose of arguing is to also achieve consensus, a shared faith in a choice.

An argument is a claim supported by reasons and pieces of evidence. Arguments have five primary attributes. Firstly, argumentation is a social process which involves two or more parties responding to one another’s proposal or claim. For the case of a written argument, the writer responds to the content of the essay through a critique process. The responses should not only involve restating the same claims and reasons but rather providing supportive pieces of evidence to the positions taken accordingly. Secondly, the aim of an argument is to make the audience adhere to the written critique. The objective is to influence the audience with the aim of gaining support to

The first strategy described by the author is to always know who is arguing and where they are coming from. By identifying the author’s viewpoints and meaning of their statements, you can better understand their stance: what it is and how they want it conveyed. When writing, it is also important to exude such qualities to your audience for formal and direct purposes.

On September 19, 2016, AEON publishes an article by Judith Lichtenberg, “How US prisons violate three principles of criminal justice”. Lichtenberg claims the United States prison system is a failure for society and brings to the table that for most of the time, it is against African Americans. The argument is prominent across America, Lichtenberg writes, but no one is standing up for the better of society. Therefore, she makes known that retribution is a major issue, leading to the type of quandaries we have with the Prison System. Three fundamental principles should control the utilization of incarceration as penalization. Lichtenberg argues everyone should have a fair chance in getting the right punishment, any malefactors, no matter the circumstances, that does the same crime should get the same verdict, and prisons should rehabilitate than eradicate, whether

Thea wakes up first, so she wakes Lily up and they play on their floor for a while until Tom comes in and joins them, Toms says that it's good to let you child side out once in a while. Addison comes in the room and says that breakfast is ready and that everyone should come and sit at the table. Tom and the girl's go and sit at the table and it's full of food again.

Gerard A. Hauser covers a plethora of details on how to create a well-made persuasive argument in his book, an Introduction to Rhetorical Theory; however, he covered three specific essentials that are necessary for persuasion: the components logos, pathos and ethos; purposive discourse and rhetorical competence; identification. I will argue for each constituent, respectively, to prove that persuasion cannot thrive without the aforementioned essentials.

In chapter seven, Martha Nussbaum discusses how the economic crisis in our country has led many universities to make deep cuts in humanities and arts programming. She also goes on to discuss how the humanities are often seen as inessential and this can be seen through one of the United States’ largest public universities where there was talk of selecting a few humanities disciplines that are supposedly at the “core” of an undergraduate education and eliminating the rest.

The traditional method holds the explanation and evaluation close to the core when critiquing, whereas the narrative method is deemed as looser when using explanation and evaluation. When applying the narrative method, the evaluation of the source plays on two elements, the narrative possibility and fidelity. The former touches on the story being realistic and the components of the story making sense, or in other words adding up. The latter allows the critic to analyze and figure out if the story is true due to other stories and personal experiences. These elements also allow the critic to discover the credibility of the source or author of the message. Through this evaluation is when the narrative method displays if the narrative given achieves the function of persuasion. On the other hand, when applying the traditional perspective, the evaluation centers on analyzing the message for how well it was put together considering the audience and context, and the understanding of the source, for credibility. All of these components are considered the explanation of the rhetorical features of the text, and lead to whether or not the persuasive goal was reached. The ideas of source credibility, and the end goal of persuading the audience are huge similarities between the two methods. Differences

Anyone can write an argumentative essay, but to be able to make the reader understand the content of the essay, it is vital to write the content in an organized way. While taking the Core Humanities course, Kritika had to write an argumentative essay about five different philosophers she studied, while making connections between them. Kritika employed several techniques to make her written communication effective. First, Kritika read the prompt attentively that helped Kritika understood the requirements of the essay. Kritika, then, began to form the outline to communicate the ideas to the professor accurately. Furthermore, Kritika wrote the thesis statement in the first paragraph and wrote five paragraphs to support the argumentative thesis.

Ultimately, the data analysis should bring the researcher the findings, i.e. the answers to research questions, via a step wise process described in “coding” (Merriam 177). I used this process of analytical coding, category construction, category naming and organization to generate codes for my Data collection report and genre analysis. The data, analyzed under these different codes, gives answers to research questions of my extended writing project. I also utilized the Wadsworth Guide to learn about different rhetorical appeals, such as ethos, pathos and logos. The Wadsworth Guide explained how logos appeals to reason and logic, ethos appeals to credibility and authority, and pathos appeals to emotions (page 183). I used this knowledge to further analysis my codes and extract meaning, in perspective of the effect of these genres on inter-community Discourse and beyond. This theoretical framework addresses questions of what literature and genres convey meaningful information about the written part of research in my discourse

One of the most notable points from the reading will have to be the factors that influence individuals to make decisions based upon what goes on in the daily life of a person, such as going to work, watching television, and the people they associate with. This all ties into the idea of persuasion that through learning can be used as a tool to argue efficiently by learning different techniques needed to make successful refutes. Persuasion fits in perfectly with making an argument to get a message across more effectively, by providing a solid foundation, and clear ideas for the reader, so that the view you're trying to prove makes sense and is worth the listen. The main goal for the argument, is to change the reader's opinion on the matter. Learning

Chapter 3, it is a story of a young women, Joanie. She had entered college with the mindset of being a journalist. It didn’t take long until she noticed that she was doing the wrong major. She heard about social work and gave it a shot. She graduated with a social work major. She started working with family services. Joanie’s job was to take the kids away from their families when they were not safe and do follow up.

In Part V, Kelsey Timmerman is finally getting married to his wife, Annie. Thinking about his family, his grandmother, was a garment worker and he didn’t even realize it. Timmerman began to compare his wedding to other weddings in developing countries, such as Cambodia. After their wedding, the next stop was Niagara Falls for their honeymoon and also Perry, New York. Perry was the location of the factory where his shorts were made. He goes on describing his favorite shorts and why he loved them so much (because of the Dream Team in basketball of 1992). At the Perry Commerce Park, Kelsey and Annie, meets Lorraine (a reporter from the local newspaper), Mark (ACO’s president), and garment workers. Mark guides them through the factory and explains

According to Annette Rottenberg, the art of persuasive writing uses “the element of ethical and emotional appeals” as a means to influence others. (p.9) A good persuasion consists of three parts: the claim, the support, and the warrant.