Who Is Andrea Yates Insane

For the offender the only factor that affected her criminal behaviour was self-interest. Whether she followed the victim to murder or not, to some extent she wanted to extract some form of revenge. This was confirmed during the trial when the passenger who was in the car with the offender said “She was sick of them” and followed them as a means of teaching them a lesson. The offender’s defence relied on proving that at the time of the incident the factors affecting her were psychological and that her actions were uncontrollable due to her consumption of alcohol and her use of cannabis, heroin and valium in combination with her bipolar disorder. However this was dismissed upon the testimony of Susan Pullman, a neuropsychologist who proved that the offender was not experiencing mania at the time of the incident.

My conclusion is that yes, Yates is sick, but I feel a strong possibility of her understanding the wrongness of her actions to the rest of society but in her opinion acted in the greater good based on religiously psychotic feeling of heaven and hell which was a foundation of making a decision to take her children’s lives while understanding it was wrong and should have been dealt with by a swifter and stronger hand of justice. My opinion aside this is the conclusion and information brought forth by unbiased research as to the case and analysis of Yates. Only one of a twelve mental health experts who testified concluded that the Yates was legally sane when she drowned her five children in the family bathtub.

In 2001, Andrea Yates drowned her five children in a bathtub in her home. This was very disturbing news. I am a native Houstonian. I was at home that day. The television was on and will never forget the news breaking announcements that broke the story of a homicide in Clear Lake. All the information the reporters had was a mother killed all her children then called the police to report it. The full story and the details that lead to this tragedy did not unfold until years later. It was sad because as details unfolded if Andrea Yates had been treated properly and followed her doctors

The article, ‘Judge: Cop Killer Brandon Daniel competent can dismiss lawyers’ published in July of 2015, talks about Daniel’s case—overall punishment. This article is about a twenty-six year old man, Brandon Daniel, who murdered an Austin, Texas police officer. The police officer, Jaime Padron, received a call involving shoplifting at a Wal-Mart in the north side of town. Both, Brandon Daniel and Padron were wrestling on the floor when the officer was shot dead. In this situation, this murder is considered capital murder. When an individual is sentenced with capital murder, they are sentenced execution or in other words the death penalty. Texas is known for having the highest number of death penalties since 1976. However in this case,

Emmaleigh Elizabeth Barringer was a 10-month-old infant who was nearly dismantled and pronounced brain dead from a 32-year-old Benjamin Taylor in West Virginia who had viciously raped the infant. The 10 month old infant later died from her injuries. Which means that he must have assaulted the infant not only vaginally but anally causing the child’s organs to shut down and causing massive blood loss and trauma to the brain stem, she was pronounced brain dead after the crime, and later pronounced dead. West Virginia is one of 18 states in the union which do not have capital punishment. The Mountain State abolished the death penalty in 1965. That must be nice for the malicious infant rapist and murderer. Pleading temporary insanity nor life in

Perry wanted to spare the mother’s hurt but it didn’t spare Dick any harm. Perry and Dick were sentenced to the Death Penalty. Sentencing two people together could be tricking but it can help by getting each side of the story and could save time in court. Since Perry and Dick were together at the crime scene then they should be tried together. So the Insanity plea was not appropriate for this trial. Once the sentence was given Perry and Dick were taken to a home by the prison to stay while on Death Row for four years. Once the four years came to an end they were then hanged for the murders of Herbert, Bonnie, Nancy and Kenyon Clutter. The Clutter’s were just a regular family who helped everyone that they could. They were willing to drop things they were doing to help someone in need. They were the type of family that always made people feel good. The Clutter’s were murdered on November 14th of 1959.

Casey Anthony, born on March 19th, 1986, in Warren, Ohio, was one of two children by her parents, George and Cindy Anthony. In school, Casey played volleyball, ran track, and played soccer. She was a good student that excelled in math and other subjects; she even won a citizenship award. Casey hadn’t had any history of violence until a tragic event took place in 2008. The Casey Anthony case pulled at the heartstrings of millions of Americans, and made it onto various headlines for months. The people seemed to believe that Casey’s motive for murdering her daughter was freedom, without the “burden” of taking care of a child. Reported missing on July 15th, 2008, Caylee Anthony was found and reported dead months later. Casey

Virginia is that Daryl Atkins was not mentally retarded. I agree with Dr. Stanton Samenow, that Atkins was in the right state of mind to have willingly killed the innocent man without a question. Just because his IQ scores are low from drinking and doing drugs does not make him mentally retarded. I agree with the court’s decision of execution, because I don’t think life in jail is enough for someone like Daryl Atkins. After robbing a poor man and making him go to an ATM to get even more, Atkins just couldn’t walk away with all that money. He just had to go farther and kill a man, after the man did everything Atkins asked and pleaded for his life. That is the kind of man I believe deserves the execution

On June 20th 2001, Andrea Yates drowned her five children in the bathtub of her small suburban home in Clear Lake Texas. The subsequent trial and conviction caused a gargantuan amount of controversy. Jurors found Andrea guilty and sentenced her to life in prison despite the fact that there was an abundance of evidence to suggest that Andrea was legally insane at the time of the killings. In fact, 63% of the American public wanted her to receive the death penalty (). Although she was eventually acquitted by reason of insanity, both the judicial system and the American public should take a more mental-health-aware approach to the individuals they commit to prison.

Eventually, Angela confirmed that something opposite occurred, claiming she didn't want to be criminalized. The events she explained conveyed that on the late evening of, William, irritable, went to check in on his daughter and ended up brutalizing her. This story easily turned into a confession after authorities confirmed that the injuries Ariana sustained were consistent with the autopsy report. Overall, this resulted in the courts leniency on Angela's behalf for plea bargaining. Personally, I believe justice was served considering Angela’s admittance during her last interview, effectively solving the

Andrea Yates’s story is one of the many famous landmark cases where individuals have pleaded not guilty by reason

Andrea reflected back on her past of abuse to use for her defense as well, but Andrea was giving a life sentence (Preston,

Ms. Orndorff was examined by two mental health experts before trial and was found that she had a propensity of dissociating emotions and actions from conscious awareness. However, she did not suffer from any mental disorder supporting an insanity defence. Ms. Orndorff introduced a testimony in attempt to establish that she had amnesia after shooting, but she did not purse an insanity defence. Hence, the jury found her guilty of both charges. Even though she presented an evidence of the DID diagnosed after the conclusion of the guilt phase of the original trial, the trial court ruled that even if the jury found that Ms. Orndorff had DID, its presence would not permit the jury to acquit her, because no evidence established that her mental disorder

A Texas mother named Andrea Yates was freed from prison for the violent murder of her five small children including an infant by reason of insanity. She suffered from severe postpartum psychosis. This form of psychosis can affect mothers after childbirth especially if they already are predisposed to mental illness or depression. During this time a mother can loose her ability to make rational reality based decisions. This is what happened to Andrea Yates and so many other mothers. How can one be accused of a crime when their sanity is in question? Poor mother. If Andrea Yates can be forgiven for her insanity of brutally killing her children, then can 't Alison Quets be forgiven for only wanting to love her children? Who is Alison Quets? She is a 49-year-old single woman from Florida. Ms. Quets said she always dreamed of being a mother even as she worked as an engineer. She underwent invitro fertilization and gave birth to twins, a boy and girl. After the birth of her children she stated she was in a lot of pain from the surgery. Sleep deprived throughout the pregnancy, as well as from handling premature babies alone. As a mother I know how tired you can become from the care of a newborn infant. I couldn 't imagine being single with newborn twins. After stating her body began to give out on her, the inability to heal from the surgery, unable to eat, and sleep, she began to consider adoption. In spite of her dream of mothering, she made the decision to give her twins up for

Yates psychiatric history falls in line with her not guilty by reason of insanity plea. Her stress alone from being a “supermom” holds reason behind “people under stress...do not think through the consequences of their actions and thus do not appreciate the wrongfulness of what they are doing” (Slobogin 2003). Yates was documented as experiencing psychosis because she heard voices and saw things that did not actually exist. She believed that a television commercial was calling her a fat pig, a delusional belief that television cameras were set up in her house to monitor the quality of her parenting, that her mother-in-law had a monitoring system in her glasses, that her house was bugged because there was a van parked outside of her house, and