Andreas Vesalius Research Paper
A quote from an article from the University of Michigan states, “few disciplines are more surely based on the work of one man than is Anatomy on Vesalius” (“Andreas”). Andreas Vesalius spent the majority of his life working steadfast towards improvements in anatomy and physiology (“An Anatomist”, Florkin, “Vesalius”). Vesalius’ work changed the face of anatomy and biology as the world knew it using unthought-of methods and new discoveries. Andreas Vesalius was born in nowadays Brussels, Belgium in December 1514 (“An Anatomist”, Florkin, Mauritsbiesbrouck, “Vesalius”). Most of his life was dedicated to writing the De Humani Corpis Fabrica Libri Septem (“The Seven Books on the Structure of the Human Body”),
…show more content…
It is thought that Vesalius may have chosen his field to carry on his family’s traditional profession (“Vesalius”). Veselius’ first college he attended was the Catholic University of Leuven (Florkin, “Vesalius”). He went on to attend the University of Padua for his medical doctorate (M.D.) (“Andreas”, Florkin). After his talents had been discovered he went on to tour and teach at various colleges including his old alumna maters and the University of Paris (Florkin, “Vesalius”). His eagerness for learning lead him to excel in his field of choice and many people have benefitted from his discoveries. Andreas Vesalius contributed much of anatomy and physiology to the biology community during his lifetime. He changed the field of medicine from Galenic to his own (Florkin). Vesalius was the first to actually cut into cadavers because of Roman religion. Galenical medicine “patent(ed) falsities” because of this limitation and could no longer be considered accurate (“Anatomy”, Florkin). Many of his major contributions were around the 1540s (Florkin). ()()()()()()(Maybe talkabout where he got the …show more content…
Galenic teachings were created by Claudius Galenus who followed the rules of Roman religion when making his discoveries, which lead to many errors in his teachings since Roman religion would not allow the use of cadavers (“Andreas”). All that was known about anatomy and physiology were the teachings of Galenus, which were incorrect (“Anatomy”, Florkin). Before Galenus there was even less knowledge on medicine. Medicine was based on, mostly, the teachings of Hipocrates before Galenus which proved even less reliable but still laid a sturdy foundation for medicine (“Anatomy”, Florkin). Although Vesalius found many inaccuracies in Galenus’ work, his own work contained many as well. Which, over time, were corrected as well. Before Vesalius research was soley abstract based or based on observations of other mammals and cutting into cadavers was prohibited (Florkin, “Turney”). Now, surgeries, which require cutting, save lives every day. Without Vesalius the advancements in anatomy and physiology would be less progressed. Vesalius’ efforts have not gone ignored. Although, Vesalius has not been awarded any awards he has had a college in his hometown of Brussels named after him
This new age of anatomical research led to advancements in the knowledge of the human body. Andreas Vesalius fueled the fire with his discoveries and changed the way people viewed anatomy. Some of his contradictory discoveries included:
Andreas Vesalius published a book entitled “The Fabric of the Human Body” which was published around the time that printing first came about. His specialism was anatomy, and in the book that he
Starting soon after the achievements of Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine, in 460 BC Greek medicine and treatments began to intensely develop and improve due to anatomical research. Ancient physicians and anatomists such as Erasistratus, Herophilus, Galen, and Andreas Vesalius conducted dissections on live and dead organisms to lead them to make important discoveries about the anatomy, functionality, and overall health of humans. With passing time, each person built off of their influences work by testing validity, expanding on research, and all the meanwhile making their own discovers. However, human dissection and vivisection experiments were limited due to conflicts with ethnics and the ways of the Catholic Church. There was also the
Anatomy, the study of the human body, is a discipline of the medical sciences that flourished beyond precedent during the 17th and 18th centuries in Western Europe. During this time, many physicians, anatomists, and doctors began to not only investigate anatomy more seriously, but also to teach anatomy to more people. Dissections of cadavers became more common at learning establishments and more accepted by the general public, and by government authorities. Anatomical theatres were constructed for the mass teaching of dissections, and any and all bodies from criminal hangings were donated as cadavers to the universities. As trends grow and become popular problems are bound to become known. In anatomy, this problem was the shortage of cadavers
Andreas Vesalius, Flemish Anatomist and Physician, was born on 1514 in Brussels (currently Belgium) during the reign of the Roman Empire. He was the legacy of many physicians including his father and grandfather, who serviced the Roman Emperor. Vesalius was a student in the University of Louvain and the University of Paris, where he studied medicine. He spent his time comparing Greek documents with Arabic translations and wrote a thesis on the work of Islamic physician and surgeon, Al Razi. Shortly after he received a degree from University of Padua in 1537, immediately then he got assigned as chair of surgery and anatomy. He is best known as the founder and father of the modern science of anatomy. His first Anatomy text book was based on the human dissections he made himself.
Andreas Vesalius, an anatomy professor began to study the body and perform surgery on cadavers. He was recognized for providing innovative teaching and publication methods during the Renaissance period (Dominiczak 1687). William Harvey, a prominent English physician was famous for his studies of the heart (Dominiczak 317). His research on how the blood circulates helped scholars after him become better physicians. In the early 1600’s, Harvey got notoriety by becoming a physician to King James
Considered one of the greatest minds in Medicine, and the Philosophy of Medicine since history was recorded, Galen of Pergamon remains to this day one of the most profound physicians, and medical researchers that lived. We know this, because of his massive account of everything, he at times had anywhere from 10-20 scribes writing down all of his ideas and theories as well as his thoughts and findings during the many surgical procedures he undertook. “His surviving writings make up about half of all ancient writings on medicine today”(Agita) Although Galen philosophised frequently he never viewed himself as a Philosopher, in fact he held hostility towards some of the Philosophers of
A man named Andreas Vesalius was a key figure in the pivotal change from past to present anatomy based on the works of another man named Galen. Andreas emphasized that all surgeons engage in practical dissections themselves. From this a man named Wilhelm Fabry came into the picture, he was called,” The Father of German Surgery”, for his windlass technique. Thanks to him and his assistant, many improvements were made, like how they discovered that heat stimulates the uterus during
One of these was Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus which translates to On the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Animals. He first published it in Frankfurt, 1628 while he was a lecturer at the Royal College of Physicians. It is believed that there was no original copy of the book as it was produced through mass production and so many copies exist in museums today. However, a copy of the original title page of the book is held in the Science Museum, London. William Harvey's book on wasn't specifically created for someone. Instead, curiosity about the body resulted in him recording his findings in a logical form. However, a Greek physician by the name of Galen influenced many Renaissance physicians at the time, which made the possible success of his theory difficult, as patients deserted his practice and the medical community questioned his success. William Harvey shows a view of The Motion of the Heart and Blood in animals that reflects knowledge he had gained and the support of Kings Charles and James 1 through publicity and valued opinions. Harvey's intention was to inform the readers and fellow physicians that the blood flowed around the body, which is what he
Aesculapius played an important role in medicine and his contribution to the medical field let to many other discoveries such as medical tools.
Galen's discoveries were used for over 1000 years before many of his theories were disproved by vesalius. Galen was born in bergama, turkey, he was a greek physician. His studies seemed to be the most accurate in his era about the human anatomy. Galen only dissected animal since dissecting humans was wrong.
Harvey left a long lasting legacy to the medical world. Without his discoveries we would not know some of the things we know today. His discoveries were crucial to some of the theories to come later . His work could also be called vital because of his hypotheses, experiments, and conclusions. These all led to the discovery of modern physiology .Using experiments in animals such as the snake, he demonstrated that the blood passed from the veins to the right side of the heart (the right ventricle), that the supposed pores in the septum of the heart did not exist, and that the right ventricle propelled the blood into the lungs(Harvey, William paragraph 4). It then returned to the left side of the heart. Harvey 's discovery was perhaps natural that so novel and original a discovery that it would naturally generate controversy. On the continent, Leyden was the first university to accept Harvey 's conclusions; in many other schools, particularly in Paris, it was a further half century before Harvey 's work was fully appreciated. So important was his work, however, that by the beginning of the eighteenth century the great Dutch teacher of medicine in Leyden, Hermann Boerhaave, stated that nothing that had been written before Harvey was any longer worthy of consideration.
Galen succeeded Hippocrates 600 years later. He was a physician and anatomist that served as the court physician o the Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius Antonius. He wrote a seventeen-book treatise called De usu partium (On the Usefulness of the Parts) where he describes his theory on the structure of the human body. His sources were three and are as follows: from observations of past physicians, his experience as a surgeon for the gladiators, and his personal investigation by dissecting small apes, pigs, cattle, goats, and maybe even humans (if this was the case, then he must have done it secretly for human dissections were illegal in the Roman Empire).
In the 16th century, Vesalius decided that he would state his opinion on Galen and his own research in his book titled On the Fabric of the Human Body . However, his opinion was not quite what you would expect from someone in and before that time period, his opinion was negative toward Galen’s thoughts and writings . Vesalius did a lot of his own research in order to produce this book and to teach people what he thought about Galen’s work and compared it to the experiments he had done . This paper will look at Vesalius’ comments on Galen, why he felt like he needed to get his opinion out there and how his opinion changed the way everyone else thought.
Anatomy is to physiology, as geography is to history; it describes the theatre of events. Medical culture that emphasized the study of anatomy through human vivisection peaked in Alexandria in the 3rd century BC, with Herophilus and Erasistratus- the two primary anatomists of the 3rd century- spearheading this movement. Alexandria was the ideal place to study anatomy and physiology during the Hellenistic period since the research was not tied down by civil laws, taboos, or moralism that prevailed on the Greek mainland. Although the practice of human vivisection was decreed by the priesthood throughout the rest of Egypt and Athens, it was not so in this well-insulated center of learning.