Andreas Vesalius Research Paper

The human Maniken clay-sculpting experience may be more effective than an animal dissection because the human-clay

So, without knowledge or consent Dr. Grey went ahead with his studies on the immortal

When we visited the Mutter Museum, I was mesmerized by the amount of fascinating artifacts, collection of specimens, models, as well as the extensive variety of medical instruments. The College of Physicians of Philadelphia is replete with some of the preeminent artifacts and sets of anatomical specimens in America. As a student, I was deeply intrigued by nearly everything. I was astounded by the amount of richness and diversity that makes up the history and culture of medicine. Out of all the exhibits in the Mutter Museum, I was strongly inclined and intrigued by the exhibit of the plaster cast and conjoined liver of the “Siamese twins” Chang and Eng. These two Thai conjoined twins were born in 1811. They came to the United States in 1829 to tour and perform. Chang and Eng eventually married sisters and bought adjacent farms near the lands of North Carolina during the early 1840’s. This exhibit along with countless number of expositions of the malformations of human beings ignited a very strong interest for the subject of teratology. And it was at that moment, as I stared into the unbelievable anatomy of these incredible creatures, that I made the decision of pursuing the subject of teratology for this particular research essay.

Consequently, there was no real understanding of the human body and how it functioned. At this period in time, such remedies as using leeches for blood-lettings were common practice in Europe(McGovern, 75).

The painting of Prof. Felix Walter (Figure 1) made with watercolour on paper on stretcher by Charles Fraser Comfort stands out as an intriguing piece of artwork because of the visual choices C. F. Comfort has produced. I was able to appreciate this work as I had the privilege of attending the Nuit Blanche exhibit at the Winnipeg Art Gallery, Winnipeg on the first of October, 2016 where Prof. Felix Walter was in display at. I found this particular artistry stood out because of its placement in dominance from the other paintings, the use of contrasting styles using the same medium and the bold textures that divulge the prominence of the subject. The artist, C. F. Comfort is worth being aware of because of his exceptional work such as this painting. The composition fashioned by the art gallery should also be duly noted as it took part in making this particular piece stand out.

Looking at the extraordinary medical procedures that have become routine today, one rarely stops to CONTEMPLATE the backgrounds or research that went into creating our rich medical knowledge, but not a single one of these few could ever imagine the dark background behind much of our understanding of iatrics. It would often be assumed to be a result of tests on animals, dissections of cadavers, or through observational study. On the contrary, much of it comes as a result of twisted, malicious, and inhumane experimentation on live human beings, with a complete disregard for human life. To these doctors, the victims weren’t human; they were much less than that. Seeing as they personally designed these experiments and desired to learn more

Vesalius, however, knew that in order to learn about the human body, human dissections on corpses or cadavers had to be made. He composed charts of the blood and nervous systems as part of the curriculum for his students in Anatomy. He also wrote a pamphlet on bloodletting, which was a common form of treatment for several diseases at that time. In 1539, he was finally able to make human dissections. Vesalius stood against the belief of men and women having different number of ribs, according to the biblical story of Adam and Eve, which claims men, had one less rib than

Andreas Vesalius was a Renaissance Physician who revolutionized the way we look at anatomy. He transformed the study of biology and the practice of medicine by reevaluating the human body. Past physicians had given believable but incorrect knowledge about the human anatomy. His work was seen as being against the church which proposed a big challenge for Vesalius due to the fact that at this time the church had a lot of power. He was called a Renaissance Physician because he was a physician during the time of the “rebirth” or the “enlighten age” which was a period in time in which society and scholars thought that we should begin to fix the way we live. It was a time of advancement in every field including art, agriculture, science and many more. This led to many people questioning things that other saw as facts, and led to a time of testing and hypothesizing. This is the age in which the scientific method created and used. Scholars began to gain knowledge

I reviewed Sharon Mullin’s paper titled “The Saga of The Iris Giant’s Bone.” Sharon presented the detailed information and historical perspectives on this topic as well as medical practices involving ethical issues.

Considered one of the greatest minds in Medicine, and the Philosophy of Medicine since history was recorded, Galen of Pergamon remains to this day one of the most profound physicians, and medical researchers that lived. We know this, because of his massive account of everything, he at times had anywhere from 10-20 scribes writing down all of his ideas and theories as well as his thoughts and findings during the many surgical procedures he undertook. “His surviving writings make up about half of all ancient writings on medicine today”(Agita) Although Galen philosophised frequently he never viewed himself as a Philosopher, in fact he held hostility towards some of the Philosophers of

In 1543 Andreas Vesalius published his extensive book De humani corporis fabrica. Vesalius constructed his schematic drawings to depict the elements of the human anatomy. The images Vesalius produced were magnificent in detail and accuracy. He used a nude figure as his subject in which he conveyed his somatic depiction of the human structure.

In the 16th century, Vesalius decided that he would state his opinion on Galen and his own research in his book titled On the Fabric of the Human Body . However, his opinion was not quite what you would expect from someone in and before that time period, his opinion was negative toward Galen’s thoughts and writings . Vesalius did a lot of his own research in order to produce this book and to teach people what he thought about Galen’s work and compared it to the experiments he had done . This paper will look at Vesalius’ comments on Galen, why he felt like he needed to get his opinion out there and how his opinion changed the way everyone else thought.

For the past two-hundred years, dissection of the human cadaver has been the gold standard for teaching aspiring medical professionals the networking and layout of the human body. Surprisingly, cadaver usage has had a rather curious history.

When the study of human anatomy first began doctors knew very little about the human body and the functions of internal organs. This all started to change when a philosopher named Aristotle, began performing dissection in a systematic way, from this he started to believe that the soul is what gives life to the human body. 1 In the ancient world, the word ‘organ’ was known to come from the Greek word tool, which led Aristotle to believe that there was some sort of relationship between the body and soul. 1 When Aristotle discovered this, he started to believe all bodies required different souls; this is when he first began performing dissections to have a better understanding of all the different souls. 1 Once Aristotle had discovered this about

Webster’s Dictionary defines a vivisection as, animal experimentation especially if considered to cause distress to the subject. Since 450 BC animals have been used in scientific research. Greek philosopher Alcmaeon performed the first vivisection in 450 BC. Other Greek scientists, including Aristotle and Erasistratus, also used vivisection, or live animals in their experiments. Years later Roman scientist Claudius Galen became known as the Father of Vivisection. Galen’s work on various animals assisted him in his study of muscles and nerves. In the seventeenth century, vivisection was also used by English doctor William Harvey to determine how blood is circulated through the body.