Andrew Carnegie: A True Hero

His crafty yet cunning skills in how to make more, using less helped skyrocket Carnegie's steel business (Doc. 4). After all the long, tedious years of building an empire, Carnegie generously donated a large amount of money to the public (doc. 9). He helped fund schools, colleges, libraries, and other public organizations (doc. 9). This selfless act proves that Carnegie had good intentions in helping his community.

Carnegie was a Hero because he had not only given money to charities before he died. He

I feel that Carnegie was a very generous and benevolent philanthropist in his giving of hundreds of millions of dollars to schools, libraries, arts and music centers, and other educational and recreational facilities. However, I believe it would have been more ethical to be more

Andrew Carnegie, a tightfisted employer among many, but a good-hearted philanthropist among many more; however, does this really explain if he was or was not a hero? Andrew Carnegie was a scottish immigrant born in November 1835 who grew up in a poor and hard life, whose family made the tough decision to the Americas in 1848, started working at age 12 to appease his family’s financial trouble. He worked harder and harder, deciphering dot-dot-dash messages by ear, setting train schedules and untangling train wrecks, and saving Union soldiers, and finally, as a result, rose to become one of America’s richest and most integral heroes. However, we should ask ourselves this: Was Andrew Carnegie truly a hero? Well, to answer that question we need to look at the definition of a hero. Hero, a word defined as a person who holds amazing courage, or a person who possesses strong integrity, or a person who boasts a vast amount of intelligence or wisdom. Going by this interpretation, we could state that Andrew Carnegie was a hero in the business area because of his strategic intelligence; in the social area because of his honest integrity; and in the economic area because of his courageous work and investments.

Finally, Carnegie should be considered a hero because of his philanthropy contributions and donations to society. Andrew Carnegie believed that the best way to spend your fortune was to devote it for the most beneficial results for the community by providing them what they could not do for themselves (Doc 8). Carnegie spent most of his life gaining immense amounts of money and becoming one of the richest men of the 19th century. Once he retired, he felt he needed to use his

Imagine having all the money you want and still having a ton left over. Andrew Carnegie was a poor boy who ended up becoming the richest man in america during 1901. He worked himself up in the Pennsylvania Railroad company and would have been successful there but he was unclear on what he wanted to do. So he decided to move to New York City where he met Henry Bessemer. Bessemer taught him how to make steel, so then Carnegie moved back to Pittsburg and set up a steel mill. There he became a steel king and it caused him to become extremely wealthy. A hero is someone who has courage, integrity, and a concern for others. There were three reasons Andrew Carnegie was not a hero and they are he was a hypocrite, did not care about others, and caused others to lose self respect.

A lot of people may wonder who Andrew Carnegie was as a person. They may have also wondered if he was a hero or not. In some people’s opinion Andrew Carnegie was not a hero because he did not have the characteristics of a hero. He was an American industrialist who amassed a fortune in the steel industry. Then became a major philanthropist, he worked in a Pittsburgh cotton factory as a boy before rising to the position of division superintendent of the Pennsylvania Railroad in 1859. Was Andrew Carnegie really a hero ? The definition of hero is a person who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. Andrew Carnegie may have been a hero for the achievements he made, but in other words

Andrew Carnegie can be looked at as a double edged sword. One edge of the blade would show Carnegie as an ideal example of a poor immigrant fighting his way up to become an incredibly successful business man who would one day give nearly all his fortune away to help society improve itself. The reverse edge of the blade would show Carnegie as a ruthless business man who would slash his workers pay, drive other businesses under and used corruption to become leader of the capitalist world. These viewpoints of Carnegie have changed as years pass. Early accounts of Carnegie depict him as the ruthless conqueror of the steel industry while other later works tend to show both sides of Carnegie with great emphasis on the fact that he was a great

His net worth was 310 billion at the time of his death. His daily “wage” was near $92,000. He also made amazing contributions to people and organizations. That included the Princeton University, Carnegie Institution, Teachers’ Pension Fund, and public libraries. Despite this, some said that no amount of money for public libraries would make up for the calamity at the Homestead steel mill strike. Although, Carnegie donated $4 million to the Homestead Relief Fund for steel workers and families. Carnegie had all this money yet his employees still received very low wages. Carnegie notably believed in survival of the fittest and that it was necessary for their to be poor people for the sake of the race. People found fault with how Carnegie gave his workers little wages yet “played philanthropist” with all of his generous donations. I believe that this lessens Carnegie’s tenability to be a “hero”. He should have given his workers a much higher wage considering how much money he himself was

Andrew Carnegie was an extremely wealthy man since his invention of steel was extremely revolutionary. But his earnings weren't always spent for the greater good. Carnegie used his fortune to get out of the conflict. The background essay states that “Carnegie received a draft notice from the Union army. Carnegie followed the practice of many wealthy Northern draftees and hired a Pittsburgh draft agent to find a replacement. For only $850 he paid his way out of doing service.” If Andrew Carnegie was a true hero he would be honored to fight for our

Andrew Carnegie was not always a rich billionaire. In fact his early years were quite simple. According to document A, Carnegie lived in an attic of a modest home that was shared by another family, (Document A). Andrew Carnegie struggled, his families knew the struggles of not having enough income,and by the age of twelve Carnegie was required to employ in a job. According to an essay about Andrew Carnegie, Andrew Carnegie was “working six 12-hour days for $1.20 a week. A year later Andrew found a more challenging job delivering telegrams”, (Was Andrew a Hero ?). Andrew Carnegie had worked 12 hours just to earn his money ,as well as help his family which shows the character traits of perseverance and the sympathy that Carnegie acquired. The great steel master was really determined to make an effort on the world, and so Carnegie did. According to the same document about Carnegie’s early life, the document has stated that “He would adopt the Bessemer system and build a steel mill in America. So much for retirement!”, (Was Andrew a Hero ?). His risks and effort had helped him accomplish so much, He persevered and made himself successful,because he was willing to take the chance. This indeed proves how much of hero carnegie is, because heroes are willing to take costly risks.

Andrew Carnegie is considered to be the richest person ever. Carnegie is known for his steel business that he developed on and became one of the last steel business by buying and taking out his competition. Carnegie is said to be a very generous man by donating to education and charities. The questionable thing about Carnegie is if he is a hero? Many people see him as helpful, and nice, but others see him two faced, selfish, and hypocritical.

Andrew Carnegie was a hero amongst a few people but it can be debatable towards others. Andrew Carnegie was born in November 1835, in the attic of a weaver’s cottage in Dunfermline, Scotland. While he was growing up, his family was poor, so his family decided to move to the United States, he started working at the age of twelve. As he got older he got promoted into different positions and because of this he was able to build up his own business and bought out his competition. Could Andrew Carnegie be considered a hero? A hero is a person that does something astonishing such as provide courage, integrity and intelligence. Andrew Carnegie was not considered a hero in three areas of his life: business, money and social.

Andrew Carnegie: Hero or Not? Andrew Carnegie went from being paid a mere $1.20 a week to selling his company for $480 million. He was undoubtedly successful. However, the question is; Was Andrew Carnegie a hero? The answer is no.

Heroes come in all different shapes and sizes. Standing only 5’4”, Andrew Carnegie was a man of steel, but with a heart of gold. Carnegie grew up in poverty. He was born in Dunfermline, Scotland, living in the attic of his father’s weaver’s shop. At age 12, when his family would soon face severe poverty, Carnegie’s family immigrated from Scotland to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in the United States. Carnegie grew from a poor, immigrant bobbin boy into a self-made, financially successful man with heroic traits; he was exceptionally intelligent, honorable, responsible, selfless, caring, and generous. In 1901, Andrew Carnegie sold his giant steel company for $480,000,000, and gained his share of $225,000,000, making him the richest man in America. Despite this poor immigrant striking it rich, his story is not that of the typical rags-to-riches tale. Although extremely prosperous, the philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie made him a hero for several reasons. Carnegie’s heroic qualities, coupled with his passion and aspiration to become successful, led him to become concerned with the greater good of society. The philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie made him a hero through the purchase and renovation of his home in Skibo, Scotland, his philosophy and morals, and the amount and quality of his distribution of money.