Andy Vidak Research Paper

Every vote counts I believe that the only supporters of therapeutic and reproductive cloning are the people that have a lot of money. It will take years before the U.S. could actually find a safe type of cloning on humans. Imagine how many animals die or suffer from injuries because they are being tested on. Animal cruelty is another reason why I think you and others should vote against cloning “Despite years of research, more than 95 percent of cloning attempts fail, a significant number of cloned animals, as well as surrogate mothers who carry clone pregnancies, suffer serious and painful diseases and deformities to produce each ‘successful’ clone” (“Animal...”).

. . concerns can be addressed when reproductive cloning has been shown to be safe in animals, which it has not yet." (Paulson) The success rate by means of reproductive cloning remains pale in comparison to natural procreation, and thus does not justify cloning as a form of procreation for the time being. The current success rate for reproductive cloning stands at one or two viable offspring per 100 experiments, and until the success rate drastically increases, cloning humans would be potentially dangerous and unethical.

Cloning is very unethical. It would be violating the human rights in many ways. It would be violating of the freedom of beliefs and thoughts (Peter Flaherty, and D. Lynn Moore. Civics. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2000) Cloning also reduces human dignity. Humans can be sold as manufactured products. If we allow

There are many good reasons to both develop cloning and incorporate it into modern medicine. Human cloning is extremely beneficial, but there are some downsides. Many of the problems are ethical in nature. Matthew Nisbet involved the public in his article. He polled the public on their opinions about human cloning and stem cell research. He found that “The public appears to have strong reservations about research that destroys embryos”

Cloning could mean giving loving people a son or daughter or saving a life. Even though cloning has some risks the benefits out way them because the stem cells that are naturally being produced anyway is what is being used for medical treatment. It's more important that cloning is able to take place so that research is carefully done to help and better future generations to

According to Laurence C Smith, “Due to the potential advantages for pharmaceutical companies, farmers, and research agencies, mammalian cloning is likely to become a common technology towards the end of this decade.” In the future there will be many medical and technological advancements that will further the process of cloning. It is only a matter of time before it is fully mastered and engineered. This quote supports my statement because it provides evidence that further experimentation on cloning could be achieved in a mass amount. The cloning process could be able to reproduce either human or animal organs for someone or something in dire need of a new organ. Quoted from a man called Steven Best in his article “Biotechnology, Ethics, and the Politics of Cloning”, he stated “Scientists argue that therapeutic cloning has tremendous medical potential, early in life, for example; each individual could have their own ‘body repair kit’ if they have developed a disease or even lost a

Even though we are in a technological and medical age, we should not consider the legalizing of human cloning. Granted the benefits are endless, but at what cost. The Roslin Institute created Dolly was created in advancing medicines for the production of milk. If at the end result was conceived and Dolly was terminated that would end a life. (1996) When we clone ourselves for our own benefit we initially duplicate our lives. MedicineNet.com mentions that to clone a person is to create a person, and therefore we create a life. (¶ 1) Even though with the advancements in stem cell research our federal government will not allow the use of federal funds to support an unethical cause. According to Johnson (2008) our former Presidents Clinton and Bush have ensured that the federal money will not be spent to support human cloning.

Meanwhile, many people are born or become infertile due to an accident they could have had, these people are constantly being judged by everyone else, but now cloning can help them be a parent. They say things that hurt their

I view cloning with mixed feelings, but I agree strongly with cloning being right. I do not believe that cloning humans to make more humans is right, but I do think cloning human organs to replace a defective gene is right. In England, scientists are heavily researching the embryo for stem cells. Right now the British scientists can use early embryos to study specific problems such as infertility, congenital diseases, contraception and prenatal diagnostics. Cloning good stem cells and using them for babies with these problems would prevent the diseases from ever happening. The reason for using the stem cell is because the cell is so versatile. Stem cells are taken from human embryos and fetal tissue. The cell, when never used, like in embryos, can be turned into nearly any cell type of the whole body. Scientists also expect that when using cloned embryos a person would easily overcome the problem of

Scientists have been getting closer and closer to reproducing stem cells and in the process they won 't have to deconstruct the human embryo. The bad side is that the people who are sick are waiting around for cloning. Without cloning now these sick and injured people are going to become even more and more sick and injured as time goes by. As this time goes by these people could even start dieing like. What i 'm basically saying is that people need cloning in there life, not all but some and if they don 't have it it 's not going to get any better for them. You 're basically making them suffer something that might be able to be fix.

Because the American community is currently so largely against cloning, President Clinton has passed a ban on federal funding of human cloning research, and asked privately funded researchers to stop their work for the time being. In three to five years, however, Congress is going to review the issue to see if the ban is still needed. "Whether upon such further deliberation our nation will conclude that the use of cloning techniques to create children should be allowed or permanently banned is, for the moment, an open question," says the National Bioethics Advisory Committee (Executive Summary 2). Since there is going to be a re-discussion of the issue in a few years, I think every person needs to think about where they stand on human cloning. But before we can do this, we need to understand just what cloning is, and how it works.

Human cloning is threatening our society. Yes it has benefits but with these benefits there's a risk. First and foremost i disagree with cloning because, it hasn’t developed yet and it can take a lot of tries before getting a human being to this earth. On the other hand, animals have been cloned since the beginning of this technology. They have a 70% chance of being born safely but that is not the same for humans the percentage to clone a human is 20% to 40% which is not even past birth. There has been a lot of failure on cloning but maybe one day it will be perfected. But over the years “cloning has increased at a more stable rate. This new “cloning technology can really wrong because, you’re basically make a robot just in a human form factor. One good thing about cloning is that they can clone certain organ cells and damaged tissue. But to do something like that it’s 50,000 dollars which only certain people can afford. That’s why is not extremely common to hear someone say that they have cloned a tissue or an organ.

The birth of the first cloned mammal, lamb Dolly, shocked the world on 23 February 1997.Soon after the announcement, the media attention was diverted by the possibility of cloning a human. Although the scientists from the Roslin Institute who had made the significant breakthrough with Dolly denied the possibility of creating human clones, the idea was still wide debated about the risks and benefits of human cloning. So, what is cloning? Cloning is a process of generating a new organism by an identical genetic copy of the original donor. The DNA of the two organisms will be identical (Laurențiu, 2012).With the development stage of science, human has been already manufacturing embryonic stem cells, which is beneficial to medical science such as inventing a new therapy for serious diseases. In the future, the human would take advantages of the development of reproductive cloning technology to reproduce the next generation. However, whether human cloning project should be prohibited or not arouses intense debate among the public because it is unethical and the clone technology is not perfect yet. In my opinion, human cloning would benefit the humanity, thus, the research of cloning should be carried out with strict legal protection, and limited to the category of medical research currently.

Human cloning should be legal because reproductive cloning is inevitable and therapeutic cloning provides the

A bill has just come up that would allow use of taxpayers money to fund both therapeutic and reproductive cloning and there is way you can help. I have done research on both therapeutic and reproductive cloning of all animals and human and it isn’t something I support personally. I’m not the only one who doesn’t support cloning, there are others who agree with me as well, for example, in the article “What Ever Happened to Cloning?” a director for the Division of genomics and society at the National Institutes of health stated that “people were worried that cloning would be used as a means to harvest organs or to replace people that had died.” Others fear narcissists that would engage the method in erroneous attempts to live forever or for parents to replace children that had died. Kimberly Leonard has said that some of those against to human cloning have argued that in creating a clone in science they are creating a monster. Therefore, many have also tried to ban human cloning in several different countries by passing laws but, some politicians couldn't decide when cloning should be banned. In the article “Politics of Cloning” have stated that the politics of cloning are complex by the matter of stem-cell research. Politicians as well as scientists believe stem-cells will one day be able to cure the dangerous diseases and injuries we have in this world but, they need to see the dangerous it can cause as well, for example, unplanned abortions, deformed children, and