Angle Analysis Lab Report

5.95ohms, 105degrees-9.76ohms, 120degrees-5.24ohms, 135degrees-9.20ohms, 150degrees-12.80ohms, 165degrees-16.58ohms, 180degrees-5.24ohms. These results varied, it appears as though when I made a slight increment to the degrees it made a drastic effect to the meter

Was it six days or about eight days? Both are correct. It’s simply a matter of observing the same period of time from different viewpoints.

In this lab experiment our main focus was to get skillful in using tools such as the metric ruler, balances, thermometer, and graduated cylinder to capture measurements of length, mass, temperature and volume. Additionally, this lab helped us to become more familiar with the uncertainty of measurements, as well as becoming efficient with rounding our measurements to the correct numbers of significant figures. Our results are measured consistently with rounding to the closest answer we could possibly acquire as the data can tell you.

The Raw Values Raises Questions in the Forums, Since the Raw Values Might Seem Unstable. Below Are The Raw Values Of The Sensor That I Measured, So You Can Compare Them With Your Own Raw Values.

The reason that the mesh was only recorded for 1 hour a day is that if it was recorded for any longer the mesh would eventually get stiff and harden. Then the data would be the same because nothing would change. This is why this experiment was operated the way that it was.

The Ocean Optics does not have this ability and fluctuations that deviate from the accepted value are observed as shown by its residuals plot. The r2 value (see table 12 in Appendix A and table 13 in Appendix B) shows that the data are more linear for the Cary 60 instrument (r2 = 1.00) than for the Ocean Optics instrument (r2 = 0.994).

Another way to improve the lab would be if you used more accurate and more precise photogate like the ones they use in the Olympics so we could make the data ass close to the accurate speed as possible so then we could be sure about the results.

The first possible source of experimental error in this experiment was the fact that our lab setup was not working properly since it was giving the lab group different data which lead to a higher than usual percent difference. This may hvae been caused by faulty lab equipment. The second source could've came from the PASCO since our data was incorrect depsite having a correct set-up. The third source may have been a faulty curcuit board since the data was also incorrect. Every source could have been responsible for the high percent difference.

A ruler is needed in this experiment. Near the edge of a table, the tested person was seated. Their arm was extended so that the hand is off the edge. A ruler was held between the person’s index finger and thumb, about 1 inch apart. The ruler was held above the finger, starting exactly at the zero mark. The ruler was dropped without warning, and caught by the tested person as fast as possible. The distance was recorded in centimeters.

You may have this test both in the morning and in the evening. This checks for diurnal variation.

The graph of the percentage change in declination did not turn out quite as well for

mag, m = 18.51 ± 0.36, and m = 18.96 ± 0.36, respectively, while their uncertainties

5. Equivalence Point: 24% error, Gravimetric determination: 17% error. The gravimetric determination was more accurate because an exact amount of precipitate was formed.

The point A, B, C and D were the points that the planet moved, AB and CD took the same time when they were moving. If connected each points to the sun, the areas that swept were equal. Although these areas were equal and took same amount of time, but the shape of the area were not the same. The point A and B was aphelion which was the further way to the sun and the point C and D was perihelion which was the nearest way to the sun. Connected the line to the sun, the line of aphelion would have longer distance than the line of perihelion because aphelion had the furthest distance to the sun, so these two shapes of areas were not be equal. If the object wanted to sweep these two equal areas in the same time, then it would have different velocity. On the diagram could clearly see that the area of aphelion was slender type and the area of perihelion was short and wide; it was meant that the distance or the curve AB was shorter than the curve CD. These showed that velocity would not equal when the object moved from A to B and from C to D, and this meant that the velocity in CD would be larger than the velocity in

The accuracy of wavenumber is high. The error is in the range of ± 0.01 cm-1.[27]