Animal Testing Essay

There are over 26 million different types of animal being tested on for research each year in the United States. Animals are used for testing every year for human research. Different animals go through serious pain, in order for humans to facilitate growth in different fields of study. Many animals are used in order to study diseases and potential cures for the diseases. New research chemicals are tested on animals with similar structures to humans, to see if the medicine can help with certain diseases. Tons of scientific advancement has taken place because of animal testing. Without animal testing, many diseases would still exist, without a safe way to test for potential cures. The issue at hand is the type of treatment that animals have to endure because of the different testing methods. They are treated very poorly, go through intense suffering, and normally have very poor living conditions. A pro to animal testing is that many cures and different medicines have been developed through animal testing. Without animal testing, many diseases would still exist without cures. Secondly, animals have a much shorter life span than humans do, so scientists can study the results through the whole life span of the animal. With humans, it is hard to do a full test because we have such high lifespans, while animals tend to live a lot less longer. Thirdly, many animals have been saved because of animal testing. Many diseases animals deal with now have vaccines and cures, as a result of animal testing. Without it, many animals would have rabies or other types of virus that can be detrimental to the animal’s health. On the contrary, a con to animal testing would be the pain many animals go through as a result of the testing. The tests are experimental, so we don’t know exactly what the chemical drug will do to the animal. Many cases have turned bad and many animals have died as a result, or gone through extensive pain. Next, there are many alternative methods of experimental testing that doesn’t require animals. As a result, why are we still using animals for testing when there are other ways to do it. Finally, animals are different from humans, so they make poor testing subjects. We can’t know for sure how the research

Testing animals has been going on since 500 bc. Testing on animals is extremely wrong and not a good procedure to do. Animal testing is done on 26 million animals a year. Because so many animals are tested on each year, more money is wasted than the government researches dollars, many animals have died over the years. 87% of the studies have killed animals

Animal experimentation has notably advanced the medical field since its beginnings nearly two thousand years ago. Modern surgeries, antibiotics, and vaccines have been discovered and put into effect to better the lives of humans worldwide and increase our life expectancy by thirty years. However, animal rights activists argue that tests are not accurate or reliable due to angularities. Morality continues to toy with the minds of the public. Religious organizations, like the Catholic Church, approve of animal testing when it is used to improve the means of health treatment, but the experiments must be as humane as possible. Along with this, the Catholic Church does not consider the cosmetic industry to be included in the realm of health treatment.

Testing on animals for pharmaceutical products is happening all over the world with not much talk about it. “For drugs and biologics, the focus of animal testing is on the drug’s nature, chemistry, and effects (pharmacology) and on its potential damage to the body (toxicology)” (FDA, “ Why Are Animals . . .”). A lot of people read on the label time and time again “Product Tested on Animals” not knowing just how cruel some of these testing methods actually are. “Vaccine testing in particular consumes an estimated 2.5 million animals every year because vaccines are often produced by weakening, inactivating, or detoxifying a virulent microorganism or toxin. Each batch of the finished product is then tested on animals, causing them pain, suffering,

According to the National Institutes of Health, animal testing has been around since the days of philosopher Aristotle. According to ProCon.org, there are an estimated 26 million animals used for scientific and commercial testing in the U.S. alone. Animal testing has brought many good things to the medical world, such as the treatment various disease. Also, the animal is being tested by many cosmetics companies. On the other hand, organizations like PETA- People of Ethical Treatment of Animals have fought against the medical testing of animals. There are pros and cons that come with the usage of animals in the biomedical and cosmetic testing, and each side needs should be carefully examined before deciding one way or another.

First and foremost, the inaccuracy of animal testing has caused such tragedies in human lives. The animal testing will give the scientist ideas of what may happen, but nothing is secured or accurate. As a matter of fact, ninety-six percent of affirmative tested animal results fail with humans (“Test Drugs With Technology”). For instance, in the 1950s a sleeping pill thalidomide was tested on rats. The drug passed every exam for the thalidomide, but when it was released to the public, it caused ten thousand babies to be born with astringent deformities (“Thalidomide”). Also, a drug, Vioxx, was tested on mice and showed to have protection for the heart. Tragically, when it was released, it caused more than 27,000 cardiac deaths (“Test Drugs

More than 100 million animals are killed in United States laboratories every year. These animals include mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish and birds. Many companies and cosmetic brands still test on animals, even knowing the torture that comes with it. During this testing there are several different types of tests being ran on the animals, most are painful and cruel. There are many questions about animal testing, is it necessary? Is it humane? What happens during testing? What can one do to solve the problem?

Animal testing, although extremely debated, is something that should no longer be practiced anywhere around the world. Let’s start by taking a look at just how much animal testing is practiced in the United States as well as in other countries. The article called, “Animal Use Statistics” from the Humane Society International, says, “Only a small proportion of countries collect and publish data concerning their use of animals for testing and research, but it is estimated that more than 115 million animals- including mice, rats, birds, fish, rabbits, guinea pigs, farm animals, dogs, cats, and non-human primates- are used and/or killed in laboratory experiments each year around the world.” I find this to be very absurd and so wrong that this

The organization, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals or PETA strictly enforces that “Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment or abuse in any other way”. This is an American animal rights organization based in Norfolk, Virginia and led by Ingrid Newkirk. PETA is also known to be the largest animals’ rights organization in the world (“About PETA”). Four areas in which animals suffer most extrusively for extended periods of time are predominantly focused on. The food industry, clothing trade, laboratories and the entertainment industry has ethical regulations that has to be followed and obeyed to perform any procedure. Although, there are hundreds of these organizations all around the world, professionals and unprofessionals abuse the rights every day. Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in US labs every year (“11 Facts About Animal Testing”). The regulations were made by establishing different acts such as the Animal Welfare Act signed in 1966 by President Lynden B Johnson (“Animal Welfare Information Center”). This act provides minimum standards of care and treatment that should be given to certain animals in commercial selling, research, transporting and exhibiting to public. Animals advocates want this law more strictly enforced due to the veterinarians performing malpractice. Malpractice can be performed when veterinarians have poor judgement or they are careless. Although this can result in something

Like Regan, I also regard myself as an advocate for animal rights, and therefore part of the animal rights movement. The torture and killing of innocent non-human animals needs to be stopped; this includes animal testing for biomedical research and in science, commercial animal agriculture, and fur farming. The termination of these lives is extremely cruel. But most of all, Animals are viewed as only existing for mankind and this is major flaw. As Regan stated, “the fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources, here for us.” When crossed with ethics, it creates a dilemma. The use of animals as a resource for human needs is not necessary.

Animal testing has been a topic of debate for decades. Traumatic pictures of animals being abused cover social media pages. It's no doubt the tests are inhumane, breach hundreds of animal rights, and cause unimaginable suffering and pain but, is it all necessary?

When we go out with friends, or we straighten up our house for our guests, we don't stop to think about all the products that we use and the animal lives that are taken just for the products to be put on the shelves. Frankly, we are not losing anything but our money when we purchase the products, whether it be hair products, cleaning products, body products, or makeup products, but for these to even be put on the shelves for our liking, animals are punished, killed and tormented to their absolute death. Animal testing is also used for finding ways to cure human diseases and finding cures for illnesses. For centuries now, the ethics and processes of animal testing has alway been questioned. Prevention is needed because animal testing is not always reliable for human health. “The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has noted that ninety-five percent of all drugs are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous” (Animal testing). Humans don’t always want animals to be put on the same pedestal as animals.

Libby was a dog who lived in animal testing laboratory Professional Laboratory and Research Services Inc. In this laboratory, pharmaceutical companies would pay the Professional Laboratory to infect the dogs and cats with worms, fleas, and ticks. The laboratory would then force feed the animals, smear toxic chemicals on their faces, kick, throw, and drag dogs by their necks, and scream cruel things to the animals. In fall of 2010, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) investigated the Professional Laboratory and Research Services Inc. it was then shut down. From that point on over 250 animals were rescued including Libby, who is now a happy and playful girl who enjoys playing tug-a-war and snuggling under the covers. Without the PETA investigating the laboratory though, what might have happened to Libby, and all of the other 250 animals? Pain, suffering, and death. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing because they are poor, defenseless creatures that have to go through pain, suffering, and even sacrifice their one life for human treatment.

It shows clearly that animal testing is very cruel and inhumane, because scientist force them to eat and drink just for experiment. “For example: forcing dogs to inhale cigarette smoke did not show a link to lung cancer; Flossing, an arthritis medication, tested safe in monkeys but caused deaths in humans; and the recalled diet drug fen-phen caused no heart damage in animals, while it did in humans--just a small sampling of volumes of examples.” (NEAVS-- New England anti-vivisection society)

After three dogs were forced to ingest a test substance every day for five days at Charles River Laboratories, they experienced labored breathing and a high heart rate. They became cold to the touch, were not able to be aroused and were seen with the test substance in their mouths and on their bodies. One dog died and the other two were euthanized one to two days later. (“Examples of Severe Animal Suffering in Laboratories”)