Animal Experimentation Should Be Used For Research

There is no argument that animals have played a critical role in medical research and paved the way for antidotes, cures and remedies for humans throughout history. Aristotle, who lived back in the fourth century B.C., is one of the first to be recorded as experimenting on a living animal. Back in the 1920s there was experimental testing on dogs which gave conclusive evidence to the functions the pancreas has on producing insulin. Before this, diabetes was untreatable, unmanageable and would easily result in death in humans (The Discovery of Insulin). Although testing on animals has been beneficial to us in many instances, there are several examples that prove testing on animals has hurt rather than helped the process. Many scientists argue that the physiological makeup of an animal differs strongly from that of a human resulting in different outcomes of drugs and other experiments. There has been a strong connection between smoking and lung cancer dating back to the 1960s, however all experiments done with animals failed to show

Most individuals would be saddened knowing that animals were being harshly experimented on for human benefits. The testing of animals is deemed to be cruel and inhumane. However animal testing has saved thousands of humans lives. Some believe the sacrifice is worth the gains, but others disagree and suggest other testing methods. Ultimately, the question that arises on many different occasions, is if animals should be experimented on, or not.

Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures, treatments, and major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, childhood leukemia, brain injuries, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many others, and was instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics. Using animals as research subjects is appropriate because they are similar to human beings in many ways.

“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated” (Mahatma Gandhi). Scientists have been using animals for biomedical research for centuries. They provide a source to get information scientists can not get without harming humans. A lot of debate is spread about whether it is good or bad. Animal experimentation is a controversial topic because it is helpful to humans, but it is also cruel and inhumane.

Ever since the late 1960’s and the early 1970’s, animal research has been under extreme fire for what they do. This is mainly due to the many changing perspectives on the relationship between humans and the other aspects of the world that are surrounding them. There are many main reasons for this change, but the main reason is the different ideas that surrounded the use and exploration of animals in laboratories is what is being brought into question.

Countless medical advances have been made as a direct result of animal testing. Cures and preventions of diseases have been discovered and tested for safety by using animals. Vaccines have also been created for various reasons such as influenza, rabies, tetanus, infectious

Animals should not be used for scientific experiments. According to ‘Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?’ Animals are so different from human beings that research

The major pro fo animals testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine . Many medical treatments have been made posiible by animal testing . research involving laboratory animals at UCLA leads to many medical breakthoughts that improve peoples lives and hold promise fo additional improvements in treatments and cures . Example : Breast cancer : the UCLA studies utilizing mice were the basis for human clinical trials in patients with breast cancer . The first cancer fighting drug successfully target a specific genetis alteration, thereby limiting side effects such as hairloss and nause that often accompany conventional therapies . Mouse models

Since Ancient Greece, humans have used animals as means of learning more about the world. The first known vivisection was done by a Greek philosopher, Alcmaeon, in 450 B. C. E (“Animal Testing” NP). Since then, animals have had invasives tests performed on them, been killed, and been experimented on in the name of science or for profit. Some experiments are in order to demonstrate already known facts to students, others are to further medical knowledge, and some are to test drugs and cosmetics (“Animal Testing” NP). Scientific testing on animals has led to many medical discoveries. Animals are used, and have been used for millennia, in order to make products, procedures, and life in general safer for humans - stemming from the belief that human lives are more important than animals’. In order to moralize animal experimentation, people tend to draw attention to the benefits of animal experimentation and draw attention away from the cruelties and injustice committed towards animals. To lessen the suffering and lack of fairness of animals, people should find and use alternatives to animal experimentation.

According to Sean O’Neil, the author of the article “Why Animal Research is Still Necessary” says “Almost every major medical achievement has relied on animal testing at some stage in the process …. as were the polio vaccine, lithium and penicillin.” (O'Neil). Just so you know, penicillin has saved 200 million lives since it’s invention in 1928 (Alexander Fleming). Another example is blood transfusions. Dr. Ananya Mandal, MD says the first successful blood transfusion was done by Richard Lower in 1665. He tested blood transfusions on dogs. Since then, blood transfusions have saved over 1 billion lives, which is significantly higher number than the entire population of the United States (Mandal). If animal testing was not used, then forget about 1.2 billion people getting saved. Ha whatever, that’s just the entire world population of 1850. Some more examples of medicines or knowledge about conditions or diseases being found by animal testing is breast cancer, childhood leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, lung cancer, Hepatitis C, heart disease/stroke, epilepsy, and many more (Animal Research Benefits). Not only does an abounding number of animal tests lead to medical breakthroughs, but sometimes a new cure for animals is discovered. An example is insulin. Both people and dogs suffer from diabetes. Insulin was tested on dogs and now helps people and

Animal Experimentation is the use animals in scientific studies. At Least 90% of experiments in animals fail in humans. Therefore there really isn’t a purpose to animal experimentation if it isn’t accurate. Animal Experimentation should be terminated because it is old fashioned, bad science, and unethical.

Animal experimentation by scientists can be cruel and unjust, but at the same time it can provide long term benefits for humanity. Animals used in research and experiments have been going on for 2,000 years and keep is going strong. It is a widely debated about topic all over the world. Some say it is inhuman while others say it’s for the good of human kind. There are many different reasons why people perform experiments and why others total disagree with it.

For as long years pass, there has been a progressing warmed confrontation with probes creatures for the advantage of medicinal and logical research. Whether it is or isn 't, the vast majority trust that some type of advantage test ought to be performed to figure out, whether the activity is correct. These incorporates cost creature agony, misery and passing whereas the accumulation of new learning or the improvement of new therapeutic treatments for people. Investigating more into detail, these distinctive parts of the experimentation is a vast crevice for contention between the diverse researchers ' perspectives. A notable researcher from."Animal Research Is Wasteful and Misleading." Scientific American 276.2 (1997) named Neal Barnard expressed "The use of animals for research and testing is only one of many investigative techniques available. We believe that although animal experiments are sometimes intellectually seductive, they are poorly suited to addressing the urgent health problems of our era, such as heart disease, cancer stroke, AIDS, and birth defects" (80,p1).In detail,acknowledge creature examinations neglect foresee any dangerous impact on medications. The lion 's share of creatures in labs is utilized for hereditary control, surgical mediation or infusion of outside substances.

Animals should be used for research and Experimentation because if the animals get sick or show any signs of acting abnormal then the scientists know it isn’t safe for humans to use. Animal research has played a big role in nearly every medical breakthrough over the last decade. Animals have the same organ system that perform the same task, which helps determine if what is being tested is safe for humans to use. Most of the medicines animals use the same medicine as humans like antibiotics, pain killers, and many more this helps to see if the medicine cures the animals without any harmful consequences then it would be safe and useful for humans to use.

Humans are animals. In a behavioral and emotional aspect, these two species share the same characteristics. But, what makes humans differ from the rest of the animal kingdom is the ability to think critically, morally and act rationally. As time goes on, humans are becoming more intelligent than before. Because of their curiosity, during the ancient greeks humans began to conduct experiments on animals so that they can learn more about their body and other species. Even till nowadays, there’s scientific research that involves animals. However, are these research still necessary for the advancement of science for human beings? Should animal experimentation still be allowed in scientific studies? My stand on this debatable topic is no. Animal experimentation should not be allowed because it is inapplicable, inhumane, and there’s better alternative.