Animal Rights : The Wolf Pack

Non-human animals should have the same rights that humans have such as not being used as food, clothing, entertainment, or experimentation.

Animals do not have the cognitive ability or moral judgment that humans do and because of this, they have been treated differently than humans by nearly every culture throughout recorded history. If we granted animals rights, all humans would have to become vegetarians and hunting would need to be outlawed. That means we wouldn't be able to have hamburgers or hot dogs anymore. No hamburgers or hotdogs would mean no more barbques with your family and I mean come on who doesn’t want to spend time with there family? That is just so cruel to us and really messed up.+6

The Animal Bill of Rights is meant to protect animals that don’t have legal protection. There are laws that protect some of the animals, but are often insufficient and full of loopholes. In this society we have many people who think the total opposite of defending the animals. It may be because of selfish thinking. Sometimes one might think, it is needed for them to survive or because they want to be able to show their children the animals in person at zoos. Now, the question is, if animals need a Bill of Rights? I strongly believe that they do need a Bill of Rights because there are animals on the day-to-day basis that are being mistreated and abused by humans that don’t care for them. We need the Bill of Rights because it will give a better voice to the animals being treated as if they were nothing in this world. I agree with what the source indicated “ Animals in the U.S. are considered just “property” by law, even though they are living, feeling beings”. If they were not considered “property” humans wouldn’t be harming these animals and would rather be caring or not giving them much attention if they aren’t an animal enthusiast.

The statement by Paul McCartney rings true, “If slaughterhouses had glass walls everyone would be a vegetarian.” Animal rights is a concept which people hardly ever consider in a serious light. Being born as a human being, having a superior mental capacity and sense of times makes people think that they can rule this world and use other living beings as they see fit. This mentality leads to people say things like “animals are born to eaten” or how Aristotle claimed “all of the nature exist specifically for the sake of men” and “that animal are merely instruments for humankind.” (Pg. 495). This way of thinking often leads to overconsumption of animals, cruelty to animals and loss of species.

Animals are found throughout lives of humans. As companions, entertainment, test subjects and food, animals serve vital roles throughout our lives.The Animal Bill of Rights, through the Animal Legal Defense Fund, attempts to defend the basic legal rights of all animals. However, to weigh the need for such an act, one must compare the suffering of animals to the benefits such suffering gives to humankind. It’s much more important to highlight the crucial medical advances that lab animals have provided over the injustices they may suffer, but this suffering can not and should not be ignored. It is with measure that we do not enact a bill of rights for animals, however we bring new awareness of animal research and the ethical treatment of all

Social myths envisioning wolves as conspiring, Forceful mammoths plotting to jump on guiltless casualties don’t mirror reality. In actuality, wolves are subtle animals who mind their own business. The wolf’s social structure is much like our own. They live in family units called packs comprising of a mated pair, youthful pups, and more established posterity. It is through the perplexing connection and communications inside of the pack that posterity figure out how to live as grown-up wolves. As the earthy person Charles Bergman focuses our, “wolves are seriously social creatures, living in packs that are organized in unblending progressions. In the chain of force every wolf has a characterized place on a step of predominance and accommodation”. The whole pack cooperates as indicated by position to raise and sustain the pups, showing them a profoundly advanced arrangement of correspondence utilized “for communicating their status with respect to one another”. Additionally, from folks and more seasoned kin, youthful wolves learn how to chase as well as what to chase also. Wolves are prepared ahead of schedule to pursue certain prey and allow others to sit unbothered. Since their prey is normally bigger and more grounded than they, wolves are taught particularly to chase the frail and debilitated so as to keep away

“Nearly as many, 68 percent, were concerned or very concerned about the well-being of animals used in ‘sports’ or contests as well as animals in laboratories (67 percent) (Kretzer, 1).” Many people question whether an animal is capable of thought and emotions. Others feel as though animals are the equivalent of humans and should be treated as such. Since the 1800’s, animal rights has been a topic that has several different sides including two extremes. If animals can react to their environment, emote, and are aware of things done to or with them, then they should have similar rights to humans.

Do you know 2 million animals are killed by wildlife services ? Animal rights have been a prevalent issue since 1970s. An organization called Animal Legal Defense Fund has supported a petition that strengthens the protection of animal rights. The petition states that all animals are to be free from exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse. The Animal Defense Fund is working on trying to show congress the importance of the Animal Bill of Rights. Every day, animals are being manipulated by humans to do things that they don’t want to do, or that violate their rights as living creatures on Earth. Animals and humans should have equal rights despite of their barriers . As an animal lover, I agree with the idea of creating the Bill of Rights for animals.

Seems rhetorical, but the fact is animals live through this everyday, without even given the choice. As humans, we establish our authority among all living beings, but for what reasons? Are humans better than all other species? Or is it true that we should hold a precedence over nonhuman animals? The ultimate question then remains, should animals have as much or equal to the same rights as humans? Their are endless arguments for and against this question, and many sub arguments that go hand in hand with each side. In this paper, I will discuss the definition of what animal rights entails and expand on the history that developed it’s meaning. Furthermore, I will thoroughly discuss, reason, and explain each opinion presented by our current society as well as the positions held by previous philosophers. Lastly, I will draw a conclusion to the opinions presented by discussing my personal position on the argument of animal rights.

Currently by law animals have no rights, rather they are considered as property to the owner or state. However, by using deontology we can look at the duties of these owners, rights of the animals, and consequences of not giving the animals any rights. Not all animals are property just like humans are not property. They are living beings which have their own rights and ownership except for the case of domesticated pets.

In the nutshell, it is fairly known that in humanity the most important role has been played by animals since last many eras. Animals have been kept as pets by humans for many years. Although, in last few years, issues regarding care and protection of animals has taken wide attention from media. With reference to the animal rights framework developed by Tom Regan, it can be firmly argued that animals also have the rights to choose what is right for themselves. It is suggested that pets should not be used as an object for food, comfort, clothing or researching purpose as they are moral creatures with having sentiments and feelings to be regarded appropriately. There are few drawbacks of owning pets, however, comparatively more numbers of advantages

Therefore, animals deserve rights to protect their lives and sanity. Animals should be given more legal rights and protection to prevent harm caused by any animal experimentations and factory farms.

they thought that because animals were getting abused or worse. And at some point other people thought that other people should be treated differently, so they made them into slaves and they starved them and those people knew how animals felt because they were treated like that too. Soon people protested that they should stop making them into slaves and they protested about animal rights too so they can treat them differently and they finally stopped and some people treated animals differently. I wanted to learn more about animal rights because I wanted to know if people protested and if anybody cared. And when I researched animal rights, it said that when people protested some people thought of animals differently and it said that still a lot of people don’t care, but at least some people care. Do you know what people do to elephants, monkeys, and other animals if they do a trick wrong? Well,people hit them or starve them if they do the trick wrong, I think they should just make the animals practice more, because what they’re doing is wrong. Do you know why it’s bad that people throw their trash on the streets? It’s bad to throw trash on the streets because animals can eat it and maybe even plastic,if they’re very hungry, and soon they end up dying so please don’t throw your trash on the streets.I think that animal rights can be solved because it is already working, like people stopped other people

While animals do not have the means to fend for their own rights, they still deserve to have them. Like humans, animals are aware that they exist. They are so self aware that if an animal were placed in front of a mirror, they would be able to recognize themselves (Dunbar 1). Additionally, they are aware of the suffering they undergo, which can manifest in the form of being killed, carrying heavy loads, and being caged. They have friends and know that their friends and fellow animals exist (Waldau 12). With this being said, if something violent happens to them, they are left traumatized because they are aware of what has happened to them. Whether people agree or not, animals have a valued life to them. They deserve a long and

Animal rights activists believe in giving the life of an animal the same importance as a human’s life. Animal welfare accepts that animals have interests but allow those interests to be traded away as long as the people benefit from the sacrifice. In contrast, animal rights theories say that animals, like humans, cannot be sacrificed or traded away to benefit individuals and their needs. Animals should not have the same rights as humans because they were not put on this earth to serve as equals they were put here for us to benefit from.