Animal Testing And Biomedical Research

This is an annotated bibliography of animal testing and if it’s morally justified. There are many opinions on the results and the entire process that it takes to test a cosmetic product or a medicine on an animal. There are many alternatives and benefits to animal testing but is it really justified? Or are animals in potential danger.

Nancy Day talks about the two unique perspectives of the generally discussed subject of creature testing and altogether discusses the results of creature testing and experimentation and furthermore the advantages we pick up and expand upon. Staying nonpartisan, she gives the pursuer a decent opportunity to see where both sides are originating from additionally giving many motivations to reject the other so that no inclination is affecting the pursuer’s sentiment. Implied for any one, mindful of this level headed discussion or not, she clears the reality this issue has been overstated and is undoubtedly influencing our day by day lives regular. This book has a fundamental motivation behind giving the pursuer some data about what is going on with the goal that they can choose for themselves which side in this warmed debate to take. This two sided pugnacious source gives an alternate bend and draws in the pursuer to an unceasing fight while alternate sources are exceptionally uneven and straightforwardly tending to the solid contradiction toward creature testing. Before perusing this book I would quickly blame the creature experimenters for such superfluous savagery and abuse yet after some exhaustive exploring, I found that there are a few advantages for creature

Around the world, millions of scientists conduct their studies by testing their research on animals. Many people believe that experimenting on animals is crucial to the advancement of medical discoveries. Studies show however, that animal experimentation is brutal and unnecessary. There are alternatives though: “replacement, reduction, and refinement” (Howard 2).

Aziz, T., & Stein, J. (2011). Animal testing: TV or not TV? Two views on whether scientists

Annotated Bibliography “Is Animal Testing Morally Justified?" Issues & Controversies. Infobase Learning, 16 Apr. 2015. Web. 2 Oct. 2015.

Stated by Mahatma Gandhi, “The greatness of the nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated”. Medical research on animals is an effective way for scientist to test different medical discoveries and experiment before using them on humans to check their result. This technique has been used for centuries dating back to people such and Aristotle and Erasistratus. What exactly is medical research on animals? When we take a deeper look into the experiment that are preformed we can conclude that animals are a living model of humans in these laboratories. It is a necessity to harm and test animals with new drugs in order to market them in the medical industry to aid human illnesses. In order to better comprehend and regulate drugs one must understand what medical research on animals is described as and its benefits to pharmaceutical companies for humans. Exposure to the trials and tribulations that animal testing reveals how important it is for scientists to understand the negative effects they contribute to an animal’s welfare and life. In contrary animal testing has been used to save many human lives from consuming or using a drug that could have caused them life threatening illnesses.

Imagine being poked and prodded with a needle, all to test for a new drug against

Since Ancient Greece, humans have used animals as means of learning more about the world. The first known vivisection was done by a Greek philosopher, Alcmaeon, in 450 B. C. E (“Animal Testing” NP). Since then, animals have had invasives tests performed on them, been killed, and been experimented on in the name of science or for profit. Some experiments are in order to demonstrate already known facts to students, others are to further medical knowledge, and some are to test drugs and cosmetics (“Animal Testing” NP). Scientific testing on animals has led to many medical discoveries. Animals are used, and have been used for millennia, in order to make products, procedures, and life in general safer for humans - stemming from the belief that human lives are more important than animals’. In order to moralize animal experimentation, people tend to draw attention to the benefits of animal experimentation and draw attention away from the cruelties and injustice committed towards animals. To lessen the suffering and lack of fairness of animals, people should find and use alternatives to animal experimentation.

Many of us are unaware of the sheer number of animals that undergo constant suffering in the name of human vanity. Animal testing was originally introduced in the early 20th century and is still prominent today. It is morally unacceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes. The procedures used in animal testing are cruel and inhumane, nor are they the most reliable source of data; resulting in many mishaps. Moreover, with the perpetual advancements in technology, there are several alternative methods making animal testing unnecessary. If testing cosmetics and drugs on humans is unacceptable, what makes it acceptable to test on animals?

Scene: Walls lined with silver cages, and a nauseating smell. This is what hits you as soon as you walk into the brand new animal testing facility. A clear door leads to another room, strong with the smell of antiseptic. A scientist straps down a dog and begins testing. Petri dishes line the counter, each growing some new fungus. While the scientist dictates his notes, you hear everything that is being done to the dog. "Test subject 1. First injection of streptococcus thermophilus in left flank. Second injection of streptococcus thermophilus done in right shoulder." The scientist carries the limp dog back to a small cage and tosses him as if he is garbage. Looking into the cage, you see the dog's skin start to blister and he begins seizing.

Animal testing is often shunned, although it helps us cure, treat, and control certain diseases. Most people don't acknowledge that animal testing is here to help us with medical research. Animal testing has helped researchers understand different diseases such as, typhus, tuberculosis, maintaining diabetes, rabies, and many more. The fact we are able to live longlasting, happy, healthy lives is incredible. Sacrificing other animals for our own benefit doesn’t sound good but look how far we’ve gotten. Researchers have cured and found ways of helping people with conditions and diseases, it’s amazing.

Animal testing; is it pointless evil, is animal life more important than human life, would you rather save a person's life or an animal life, Should research on animals be banned and risk the progress of scientific treatments and cures. Animal testing has been a major part in scientific discoveries since centuries like Penicillin discovery in 1928, Asthma treatment in 1920, Breast cancer medicine in 1950 and Insulin discovery in 1889.Banning animal testing has been a major controversial topic in the last few years. As animals used in testing may suffer from diseases, experience pain, have eating disorders. Scientists see that animal testing is crucial for any new treatment as animals are similar to humans in many ways so they can know the side effects of these treatments through testing. And animal rights activists

If you were as shocked as I was when finding out that some companies products that choose to harm animals for the sake of their own goods . Animal testing is a very popular option for many companies and for many medical research . Its shocking how people react once they are told that their favorite company does animal testing . (Yashiki, Carly)

It is true that animals and humans are different, and animal testing causes poor test subjects for humans. However, animal testing also has related to treatments and cures because animals are similar to humans in some ways. First, mammals such as chimpanzees and mice are having the same organ system and DNA that work in the same way with the help of a nervous system and bloodstream as human do. Because animals and humans are similar in some ways, they have the same conditions with illness, such as cancer. Hajar notes that “researcher using animals is part of our efforts to beat cancer. This includes discovering the faulty genes and molecules that cause cancer”. Animal testing is the tool to help people to discover drugs. Second, people admit

The case revolves around a company named Surplus Styles that manufactures hair care products. Over the past years, the company has been focusing on providing low cost products and that was its competitive advantage against its competitors. They choose their suppliers, who provided the contents for their bottles. This was their main competitive bidding method. Since Surplus Styles was focusing on providing low cost products, they did not focus on quality of the products. As a result they were not meeting the new market demands that were trending towards products with high quality. Now, the company is facing some issues regarding the quality of their products due to the rising concerns of animal rights with products going through animal testing, the company needs to start producing products that are of a high quality and not violate any of the animal rights regulations. Since the current suppliers were providing the product on the basis of lower prices, they may not be to supply quality product. Thus, Derick needs to figure out a way to get the good quality product and that too very soon in order to remain in the business. (Sanders, 2011)