Animal Testing And The Space Race

Did you know that during the "Space Race", both the Soviets and Americans sent animals into space for testing? The issue of whether or not animal testing should be allowed for astronomic purposes has been around for a long time. Some believe animal testing is cruel and evil. While others say "it's completely necessary". I believe even while being "unfair to the animals", animal testing is necessary.

Animals that were used in during this experiment was necessary to save human lives. If they wouldn't have animals tested during the space race, how would they have known that it would be safe? Think about it, would the Space Race have happened if they never animal tested? Russia was first known to send a dog named Laika to space, but America has also done animal testing. According to Amplify, they stated that "A week later a bear named Oscar was knocked out with anesthetics, strapped into the chair of a high-speed sled, and sent on a ride that subjected him to twenty times the force of gravity. 'We wanted to prove that a person could withstand rapid deceleration with no ill effects,' said a military spokesman. A thorough examination being necessary to prove the absence of ill effects, Oscar was killed and then autopsied." In that piece of evidence, they stated that Oscar, the bear, was killed. Yes, that's tragic, but it is better an animal rather than a human life being sacrificed. Just think, would you rather risk your parents or your pet? It is a hard decision but animals are easier to let go than another human being. There is

Animal Testing was necessary during the space race. This is because at the time of the space race nobody knew if humans could survive in space. This meant sending animals was the best option. As well as the only option. This can be located at https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/9-12/features/F_Animals_in_Space_9-12.html were it states "in the earlier days of space exploration, nobody knew if people could survive a trip away from Earth, so using animals was the best way to find out".

Ever since the beginning of human history, to the reign of the Mongols, and even to the colonization of the Americas, disease has played a role in shaping society. Its negative impacts has depopulated many cities, countries, and empires. In the distant past, it was quite difficult to avoid contagious diseases. However, in today’s society, steps have been taken to discover new effective modes of treatment through animal testing. Such testing; however, has proved to be quite a controversial issue due to ethics and its utilization of animals. Despite any objections, the use of genetically bred animals is imperative for the purpose of discovering new medications to treat various terminal diseases.

Animal testing might have been the wright idea because, if something goes wrong people would then know what to do if that indeed happened. "Animals go into space to help conduct scientific research only when absolutely necessary. Researchers prefer to research with computer models, or by involving the astronauts directly." ( Canright) Nasa explained that they only use animals if really necessary. So they don't risk that many lives of animals.

“Lots of people talk to animals…Not very many listen, though…That’s the problem”(Ben Hoffman). The controversy of animal testing is phenomenal; it always has been. I remember dissecting animals throughout my years of school in the "name of science". It was only until recently that I started questioning the government 's methods to teach us. We dissected a dog shark in my oceanography class last year. There had to been at least 80 dead sharks in about four different buckets; that was when it crossed the line. I understood a lamb eye or something, but breeding sharks in captivity just so they can be killed? Animal testing is wrong in every way to me.

When understanding the flaws of animal testing, one can see how appalling it is to see how the animals are treated. When animal testing is stopped the scientific community will be helped and will have a better future. Animal testing

are not able to give consent for this as would be required of a human. Other

To start, animal testing during the space race was tremendously necessary because this would help scientists begin to answer the question of 'What happens to a human body in space?'; animal testing could also help Scientists learn how microgravity affects balance, sensory integration, sleep, control of blood pressure and the development of the nervous system, and finally, it could also help prove the safety and viability of launching a living being into space and return it unharmed.

The controversy behind animals as research subjects is mainly one of morals and the ethical treatment of said animals. Many people believe we should use them in this way, so we aren 't actually harming people in the pursuit for better things for humans. Though animal testing was a viable resource for many years, it has proven to be extremely controversial and unethical, therefor the use of animals as research subjects should be outlawed.

Would you save a human life or a dog? During the space race, scientists used dogs and other animals instead of humans for experiments. Before humans actually went into space, there was a theory that humans couldn't survive long periods of weightlessness. There had been several debates among scientists about the effects of prolonged weightness. American and Russian scientists utilized animals such as monkeys and dogs in order to test each country's ability to launch a living organism into space and bring it back alive and unharmed.

The issue of animal testing is a widespread and very controversial topic. It entails carrying out torturous and harmful tests and experiments on animals (most commonly mice or rats, but also other animals like rabbits and guinea pigs) for scientific research, whether it be for medical causes, products or cosmetics. In many cases, animal testing is unavoidable – it is impossible to rid the world of something humans rely on so dearly; however, it is imperative that we recognize the moral impacts of our actions and stop relying on it as a major research tactic. It is quite odd that it continues to be commonly used, despite being largely ineffective, the abundance of alternatives available, and the moral issues it brings into light.

Long term thinking and the invention of new technologies and cures as result of animal testing could possibly be more beneficial for the world as a whole, while short term thinking that views hurting animals for possibly no beneficial outcome would benefit the individual animals that are being tested

The development of new treatments including medicines are distinguished for being time consuming, costly and complex. However, this timely manner is beneficial for society as it meant to provide an efficient and safe medication. Concerns regarding when animal studies are necessary compared to clinical trials has been a debatable topic among society. For over a decade, animal research has served as a fundamental component in many medical findings. Mousses are commonly used in laboratories, as we as humans share nearly 95% of our genes, making them a useful and efficient model for the assistance of discovering medications used today (Grant, 2017). Bench studies should continue to be practiced by researchers as

Whether animal experimentation is justified or not has been undecided for many decades. Many years back, the debate was carried out by animal rights groups which were led by the Cambridge University to get rid of its plan for a primate research in 2004. Since this debate, many supporters have become more confident in speaking out what they believe and getting their points across to people.