Animal Testing Are Unnecessary

Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. However, what many people forget are the great numbers of animals that have suffered serious harm during the process of animal testing. Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. The development and enhancement of medical research has been based on the testing of animals. There are many questions being asked if animal research is good or not or if the benefit for us is way greater the abuse of animals. Doing tests on animals can help find ways to cure diseases, but testing on them is wrong. Although we want to find cures for diseases to help many people, testing on animals not only

Animal testing is inhuman, and should be banned. Yes, animal testing has been around for a very long time, but it doesn’t mean we should still do it. Testing on animals should be banned because they are abused and hurt, most experiments involving animals are flawed, wasting the lives of the animal subjects, and more than 90% of animal testing fail once they reach human trials.

Animal testing is a secret most companies don’t like to share. It is a global problem that needs to be put to an end. The use of animal testing is used in medicine, cosmetics and for educational purposes and it is immoral and unnecessary when we have advanced technologies that can replace these harmful methods.

Animal testing is cruel, unnecessary, and preventable. According to the article Argument against animal testing “The support for animal testing is based largely on anecdote and is not backed up, we believe, by the scientific evidence that is out there.” What is being said about animal testing is just based on a story and it is not being backed up with actual proof that we need. People believe whatever scientists are saying, but, how do we know what they are saying is true? Many people say animals do not get hurt during testing because they think that animals are protected under the Animal Welfare Act. But in reality is The Animal Welfare Act is not doing anything beneficial toward animals. Noah Berlatsky noted that “The Animal Welfare Act allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged.” This is not protection. We need effective laws against

Animal testing has been a controversial issue for decades as many claim that it is cruel and unnecessary while others insist that it is unavoidable in the process on ensuring human health. I support the former viewpoint for a variety of reasons.

To begin, one of the most important reasons why animal testing should be unacceptable, is because the human species is very different compared to any other animal; therefore, they make unreliable test subjects. For example, according to PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), they found that nearly 150 clinical trials [human tests] of treatments, to reduce inflammation in critically ill patients, have been undertaken, and all of them failed, despite all the animal tests being successful (Should Animals Be Used for

Animal testing is unnecessary because there are alternative testing methods that are more accurate and less time consuming. For example Microdosing, Artificial human skin, Microfluidic chips and computer models are all humane alternatives to inhumane animal testing. According to www.neavs.org "... skin corrosivity and irritation can be easily measured using three-dimensional human skin equivalent systems such as EpiDerm and SkinEthic." In conclusion, animal testing is unnecessary because it's time consuming, inaccurate and inhumane, yet scientists continue to use it when there are better alternatives to it.

Many scientists use animal testing for humans. Many cures and treatments wouldn’t have been possible without animal testing. There have been many studies that show that animal testing is beneficial to humans. “From formulating new cancer drugs to testing dietary supplements, mice and rats play a critical role in developing new medical wonders.”

Animal testing is abusive, ineffective, and should be outlawed. The use of animals in life sciences has been in laboratories for over a century. The American Medical Society endorses allowing testing of all animals to create new medicine or treatments for humans. Ever since animal testing has been put into action, many people have expressed their ethical and scientific unease about the experiments. Not only does the procedure cause the creature physical pain and psychological distress, but also it wastes resources.

Animal testing is using non-human animals to be test subjects in an experiment. Scientist use animals to try and help find cures for different diseases and cancers in humans. People are against animal testing because everyday animals are dying in a science lab. The laboratory is a cruel place for a innocent animal. The world should be against animal testing because, Animals are different from humans, it can be wasteful if the experiment does not work, alternatives can be used instead of animals and it is extremely inhumane

To start off, animal testing was necessary because at the time, it was unknown if humans could survive in space at all. As a failsafe, animals were sent up instead. According to NASA, "Before humans actually went into space, one of the prevailing theories of the perils of space flight was that humans might not be able to survive long periods of weightlessness." (A Brief History of Animals in Space, NASA.gov, article by Tara Gray). At this point in time, no one knew exactly what would happen to a human if they were to experience Zero-Gravity, as no human had ever been to space before at that point, the risk was high. Another survival issue that plagued space teams was, according to NASA's chief scientist of the ISS Julie Robinson, "We didn't

Animal experimentation is a big part of medical progress. Opponents of animal testing point out the amount of animals used and the different types of animals used but if you look at it, it’s all for a good reason. Animal experimenters don’t do this just to do it. It’s for a purpose. There are thousands upon thousands of medical situations that couldn’t have been done without animal experimenting. Animal suffering is pointed out but for the most part animals go without feeling any pain. Animal experimentation has helped advance us so much medically that no matter what extent of suffering you find or what type of alternatives you find, it will never fully disappear.

Animal testing is conducted every day for scientific research. About twenty-five million animals participate in experiments annually. These tests occur in order to determine how chemicals or products can affect a human body. Although the use of the animals has advanced scientific research, there is a worldwide debate on the belief that the use of animals in experiments is immoral. The US government did not require animal testing until a drug, elixir sulfanilamide, was put into certain products causing people to die. Many people died from the consumption of the liquid drug, not knowing such a thing was so deadly. Afterwards US Congress passed a “Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act” in 1938. This concurrent law forces new medications and chemicals to be tested on animals before taking a risk to test them on humans. In the article “Animal Testing” the author explains that medicines and certain chemicals are required to be tested on animals before being allowed to use on humans by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Marc R Fellenz states in 1966 the United States invented legal control over animal experimentation using the Animal Welfare Act. This regulates animal tests by requiring research laboratories to establish animal care and committees to monitor the treatment of these experimental subjects. Knowledge from such experiments provide a foundation for education in human anatomy and physiology. Occasionally, scientists will experiment on animals with

Nearly every disease known to humans has been researched at some point in time using animals (Lee). As a matter of fact 100 million animals are used in chemical, food, cosmetic, and medical testing every year (Mendoza). Testing on animals can be cruel and inhumane. Many of the test done to animals have already been performed. Despite animal testing alternatives many researchers still use animals in research today. Animals should not be used in research.

Although many believe animal testing is necessary to ensure medicines and cosmetic products are safe, alternative methods of testing, such as in vitro tests and EpiDerm, are available and should be implemented. Animal testing is the use of animals in research to determine the safety of a product. Animal testing is an outdated science while alternative, non-animal methods are rapidly becoming more effective. Laws in the United States do not require cosmetics or medicinal drugs to be tested on animals, only that the products must be proven safe. Animals are harmed during the tests, despite the numerous laws put in place to avoid cruelty. In order for animals to be protected and laboratory tests to yield the best results, animal testing methods should be replaced with alternate tests.