Animal Testing Arguments

Animal testing has been a controversial topic for many generations throughout the world. People against animal testing say that animal testing is cruel and inhumane and

A lot of people don’t take it into consideration, but it’s an issue that we really need to address. Animal testing is cruelty more than science. Animals are not treated well and are often abused by their handlers. They are not just objects. They have feelings and can think, just like us humans do. Namely,

Specific evidence points that animal testing should not be allowed; however the debate is also on moral grounds. Several people, about 60% of the population, agree that animal testing should be banned because it is just wrong. To be born into the world on a concrete floor and be made to lead a life with no freedom is worse than having no life. They have no chance to stop the pain or torment, simply because they are “just animals.” Animal activists and everyday people believe that humans are voices for the animals. Therefore, animal testing is considered ethically wrong and people should act as the advocate for the animals.

Mohandas K. Gandhi once said, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated”. What, then, does it say about the people of the United States, for allowing the deaths of millions of innocent animals for the benefit of research, that in most cases is not even useful? 100 million animals are killed each year due to animal testing or experimentation (PETA,1). In the past, it was acceptable to use animal testing for scientific research, but now that there are other viable alternatives to the testing of innocent animals, such as in-vitro, stem cell testing, non-incasing imaging techniques, and micro-dosing. Animal testing should only be used in cases where said drug or treatment will treat life-threatening diseases. Animal testing in this day and age is both unnecessary and cruel, as there are multiple alternatives and the most of the time is not useful in human research.

Over one million animals are burned, immobilized, poisoned, and tortured in US labs every year (DoSomething.org). Animal testing is considered a very controversial topic that evolves to protesting rather large companies, and also leads to boycotting a specific brand that is known to test on animals. Animals should not be used for testing products because it is cruel to the animals, there are now new ways to test products, and animals are very different from humans so they are not accurate results.

When it comes to the topic of Animal Testing, most of us will readily agree that alternative methods do exist that can replace the need for animals. Where this agreement usually ends is on animals are different from humans and therefore make poor test subjects. I agree that there are other methods but I also disagree that the animal are poor test subjects because a drug might work on a cell in a test tube but how will it work on a human. We don’t know until we test a living creature.

The topic of animal testing is a widely controversial topic that is discussed by many people. Some people believe that animal testing has contributed to many advancements in medical treatments and should be continued. Others believe, correctly, that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals testing should be abolished because it is cruel to animals and humans are different than humans.

Hundreds of lives and millions of dollars have been wasted on research regarding human prisoners. The information gathered usually can’t be used because it is not reliable, and the tests done did not follow rules that were already in place. When scientists begin to take advantage of prisoners or abuse their rights, their tests become irrelevant. Since prisoners have little to no rights, scientists use them to their own advantage. Many doctors, before the Nuremberg Code and the Hippocratic oath were enforced, made advancements in medicine by these malicious acts. These people were hurt and tortured due to the things that happened before laws were put in place and enforced. Many other problems arose from testing on prisoners and some even continue to affect how studies regarding prisoners are done today.

Imagine you are an animal with no voice, and certainly no way to consent. You have been sent to a lab where a new over the counter drug will be tested. On you. But you do not know that. All you know is that you are in pain, and you want it to stop. As many as 100 million animals face that unknown fear of pain as well as suffering each year(PETA). Animal testing, in our modern world, is almost completely ineffective due to a multitude of alternative testing methods, false results, and expenses.

Thanks to animal testing, millions of lives are saved per year from otherwise untreatable diseases. When vaccines or antibodies are tested, mice are usually the ones being tested on. In order for humans to stay healthy, other animals are used to test out new medicines that can save lots of lives. Human benefit outweighs the lives of other animals, because If we don’t test out vaccines, there will be no verifiable vaccines to use as a cure.

For decades now animal testing has been a known method in society. The downside of the reality is society is not fully aware of what is going on behind closed doors, and the severity of what animal testing truly is. Although there have been many points where animal testing has proven to help in certain studies, it is also proven to be unnecessary. Biomedical industries are looking for the next cure or the safest makeup for example, but the process of it all is wrong. There are millions of animals yearly being put through suffering and cruel conditions with no break or recovery time. There is no way to actually see results in such a vigorous treatment. These animals are sick and abused daily for long periods of time and to think that any living

Another argument made by supporters of animal testing is that alternative methods are not adequate enough for companies to feel confident putting a product on the market. Cheryl Wischhover quotes the executive vice president of government affairs at the Personal Care Products Council in her article saying, “the FDA hasn’t approved many alternative testing methods that would satisfy their requirements on the safety of certain ingredients,” so this makes it harder for companies to trust in alternative methods (Wischhover). The FDA themselves state that though they do not require animal testing for safety, “the agency has consistently advised cosmetic manufacturers to employ whatever testing is appropriate and effective for substantiating the

21st century animal rights debates can be traced back to the ancient world and the beginning of society. The great greek philosopher Aristotle, argued that animals lacked reason and that humans were at the top of the natural world. But in modern times, arguments are based upon the humane treatment of animals, both physically and psychologically. The pro-animal rights nutjobs will tell you that animal testing is cruel and inhumane, that there are other alternatives available to researchers that can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings the results of the experiments are usually irrelevant. But that is simply, not the case.

testing. Another article by PETA voiced, “We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem. … We need to refocus and adapt new methodologies for use in humans to understand disease biology in humans” (Peta). This has been the problem for years now, that problem is how inaccurate the results are. Also, how the medical groups keep on getting these false results and still will not change their ways.

As we all know recently animals testing has been a controversial topic in the daily newspapers or social website, especially the argument from antivivisectionist or animal’s protector with some scientists who are doing the animals test or zoologist.