Animal Testing Benefits

“It is now for the Catholic Church to bend herself to her work with calmness and generosity. It is for you to observe her with renewed and friendly attention” once said by Pope John XXIII (BrainyQuote). Undoubtedly, the social institution of the Roman Catholic Church played an important role in developing the identity of Quebec. Even from the beginning of colonization the Church influenced the politics and policies of New France through to the Quiet Revolution.

“No matter how high up you get, never forget where you came from.” is a quote relating to The Wife of His Youth by Charles W. Chesnutt. This quote shows that no matter how rich or famous one becomes they should never forget where they started in life with the people who were always there for them. The Wife of His Youth is set within the early 1890’s in Groveland, Ohio. During the time period in which the story is set, slavery was beginning to come to a halt, leaving many African-Americans to travel up North in search of a better and easier life. The story depicts the tragedies of slavery and the many hardships that African-Americans had to overcome; in the case of the story, those hardships were being separated from loved ones, arduous labor, and brutal treatment. It was also the end of the Civil War, which meant that many slaves were being freed and were given more rights, even though those rights were

Animal testing has its benefits towards human health. Improvement in health of the human race involves animal testing. Cancer, asthma, polio, TB, meningitis, smallpox, and the human papilloma virus (HPV) all have treatments that have come from animal testing. As a result of animal testing many people would be dying or suffering from the disease. Although, many people believe animals should not be used for animal testing.

Animal Testing is uncertain and hard. Animals go through a series of tests are very painful, most of the time they are not even given anything for pain. Some product tests require the same painful procedure on a daily basis over a weeks' time. Most tests on animals cause permanent injury or even death. The tests performed on animals are not always reliable. A medicine that may be safe with animals may not be for human beings. For example, aspirin is toxic to cats, so if we were to test this medication on cats, it would not help to determine if this was a safe product for human beings. One alternative to animal testing is human testing, if we are looking to find out if the product works on humans, we should test them on humans. That case "No

Animal tests while have been successful in the past, more than likely won’t lead to successful transition into humans. Being used in medical research for years animals have led to some successes and scientific breakthroughs, but most of the time end up failing and hurting the animals instead of helping humans. Studies by the Food and Drug Administration found that about 92 of 100 drugs that passed the animal tests had failed in humans (“Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing,” 2017). Humans have become very developed medically over the last hundreds of years or so. To become more advanced has come with a drawback, harming millions of innocent animals. Most of the time when doing these types of research we end up finding something that would work or barley work in animals but will never work in humans.

In history, animal experimentation has played a significant important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. However, what many people tend to forget are the numbers of animal subjects that have suffered serious harm during the process of experimentation. Each day across America innocent animals are used as test subjects for products that have little to no relevance importance. Animal testing has had many negative issues arise in society in a negative way. Debating over the animal rights movement has raised many questions and concerns for years. There is an ongoing controversy regarding if companies should stop testing their products on animals. Although animal research has been the cause of many medical breakthroughs, is it morally and ethically right to put animals in these kinds of situations? This is one of the underlying questions that must be solved before it is too late. When considering how truly reliable the results of animal test are, and the expense of testing will help bring new light to the problem. By simply passing a policy will not only address this issue, will help better products and medicine in the future.

Using animals for research is not reliable in predicting the outcome of new chemicals on the human body system. According to American Anti-Vivisection Society, “Nine out of ten drugs that appear promising in animals studies go on to fail in human clinical trials.” That indicates that almost ninety percent of traditional animal experiments fail in human trials. Although humans are similar to animals, they still do not have the exact genetic make up as animals. American Anti-Vivisection Society claims that, “Even the same species have similar differences that can be found among different genders, breeds, ages and weight ranges, and ethnic backgrounds.” For example, humans react to new products differently because nobody is genetically the same. Some people experience the therapeutic effect of a drug and then others may have an allergic reaction to the drug. Even in the human species researchers see that not all drugs or products produce the same ideal results that are expected. If there were such wide variations of results between the same species why would it be logical to test products intended for human use on animals? This is a question that most advocates for alternative methods to animal testing would ask.

Imagine walking into a cosmetic or medical research laboratory and seeing thousands of animals locked up in cages, deformed, injured, even dead. In 2010 a total of 26 million animals in the US were tested on (thehastingscenter.org). Animals have the closest genetics to humans than anything else yet animal testing is a cruel and inhumane job and not all animals have similar organ functions to humans. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing.

“The question is not, can they reason? Not, can they talk? But, can they suffer?” - Jeremy Bentham. Testing on animals was never the humane way to test new products or drugs on animals. The fact that there are companies out there that choose to test on animals is disappointing because those companies have options to replace such cruelty. Animal experimentation is not the only option; there is always an option.

Animals are very different than humans and therefore they make poor test subjects. They make poor test subjects because of the cellular, metabolic, and anatomic differences. Animals act, look, and are made very differently compared to humans. How will you be sure the product will not be harmful just because it didn’t hurt an animal? Approximately 92% of experimental drugs are dangerous of humans even though it did not affect the animal. [Cruelty]

Over 26 million animals are experimented on each year in the United States. Animals are very different from human beings, Medicine that cures mice or rats,sometimes can cause death or diseases to humans. Although products tested on animals are generally safe, it can be a horrible thing to everyone. Animal testing is cruel because it harms and/or possibly kills animals, merchandise that is experimented on animals may have damaging side effects on their health, and it interferes with their growth and development

Antibiotics for infections, chemotherapy for cancer, and insulin for diabetes have been made possible through testing and research performed on animals. Through extensive research and time, scientists have provided people with new diagnostics, treatments, and even cures. The world would be living without these medical advancements if it weren’t for animal testing. Furthermore, animal testing is the most popular and sufficient way for scientists to progress in their research. Human testing is unethical and risky with new treatments and drugs. That’s why it’s important for experimenting to be continued on animals. Animal testing research provides necessary experiments to modify treatments and advancements in healthcare for

Animal testing has helped us for years discover cures for sickness in humans and sometimes even animals. But as long as they test the animals humanely, animals can be tortured with pain from the testing. However many efforts are being made to reduce the testing to a minimum. Scientists know that without the tests they wouldn’t know how to check the safety of new drugs.

This concept is not always a valid one. Drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe. In the 1950s, a company produced the sleeping pill Thalidomide. They released an advertising commercial which showed that the drug was tested on pregnant mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters. After the release, the drug was reported to have caused severe deformities in over 10,000 babies, and did not result in birth defects unless the drug was administered in extremely high doses (“Animal Testing ProCon.org”). Fortunately, with today’s technology, scientists can use different alternative testing methods that can replace animal testing, a practice which may not guarantee the product’s safety anyway. According to Kara Rogers, a biomedical sciences editor and is also a member of the National Association of Science Writers, “In vitro (in glass) testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used” (“Animal Testing ProCon.org”). Furthermore, the Draize test, which is a severe toxicity test devised in 1944, “has become practically obsolete because of the development of a synthetic cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin” (“Animal Testing ProCon.org”). Researchers can test the potential damage that a product can do to the skin by using this artificial “membrane” instead of conducting tests on animals (“Animal Testing ProCon.org”). With the growth of technology, animal testing is now not the only way to verify the product’s safety. Using animals as a means to verify the safety of a product is no longer necessary in today’s research and development programs. It is simply

A “hot topic” in rising discussion is the bottled water versus tap debate. In places where water, especially clean water is seemingly abundant, we don’t often think about where it comes from or how we drink it. Most people in first world countries would say that they use both tap and bottled water. If you have access to healthy clean tap water why not use it and move away from plastic bottled water. There has been an argument over this topic for quite a while. Bottled water is non-sustainable but if we use water wells or water towers there is a reduced expense both environmental and economical.