Animal Testing Case Study Essay

Animals should not be used for scientific experiments. According to ‘Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?’ Animals are so different from human beings that research

For starters, this form of study hasn’t affected any mainstream and/or “useful” animal. Animals which aren’t used in livestock or other purposes are avoided, as well as animals with short life spans being detected. In addition to this, there are laws that help prevent animals injuries, or in extreme cases death. The Health Research Act of 1895 prevents any animal cruelty, or unnecessary testing. It also prevents experiments for cosmetics, or anything else that isn’t a necessity for mankind. To top this all off, any animal that isn’t used is let free,

History---- An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC.In the 1940s, Jonas Salk used rhesus monkey to cross-contamination studies to isolate the three forms of the polio virus that affected hundreds of thousands yearly.Salk's team created a vaccine against the strains of polio in cell cultures of rhesus monkey kidney cells. The vaccine was made

It is unethical to use the cruel methods of animal experimentation for our own benefit alone. The animals used in research range from birds, dogs, cats, and pigs to name a few. So many innocent creatures put up with the immense pain so that science experiments can be made and new products can be put on the shelves. Many of the animals used in the testing and experiments are blind,

No one with firm morals enjoys endangering or subjecting animals to harm, especially when it is not absolutely necessary. That is why the laws and regulations set forth by organizations like OLAW and the USDA exist—to ensure that the minimal amount of harm is committed to the minimal number of animals while still allowing researchers to study and better understand the perplexities of human systems. The experimental animal research performed by scientists such as Alexander Fleming, Ernst Chain, and Howard Florey contributed to a shift in the tide of World War II in the fact that millions of soldiers who would have lost their lives to infections of superficial wounds or pneumonia were now able to continue fighting and return home to their loved ones. Animal research continues to be beneficial for pre-clinical trials today and to study the brain. Without animals to act as analogues to the human brain, researchers would be severely limited in the methods available to study something such as the functionality of the brain when considering all of its intricacies such as complex thought, evaluative judgement, and social behaviors. The alternative to animal research trials would include clinical trials for drugs which have not been analyzed and tested thoroughly, less data for researchers to utilize to further the progression of the overall understanding of the human body and its complex systems, and costly invasive procedures on humans in order to study behavior which could injure, adversely affect the patient for the rest of their lives, or worse. I implore you to consider, is that truly the ideal world that you

Considering the fact that animals are also used in survival necessity, such as eating, others should only understand that it is understandable to use animals in scientific labs. __ records that “people in the United States alone eat 9 billion chickens and 150 million cattle, pigs and sheep annually, yet scientist only use around 26 million animals for research, which 95% are rodents.” (115) Though it as a necessity for both cures and treatments, and to eat, some human beings do not see the accuracy in scientific laboratories using animals, but are particularly fine with animals being distributed for eating. It is not appropriate to choose one way of living over another. If one is okay with the production and distribution of animals in edible form, one should not put forth and argument in the idea of animal researching.

While opinions on the matter differ greatly, animal testing has been ongoing since at least 500 B.C., and frankly, old habits are harder to break than new ones (animal-testing.procon.org). Like the extensively tested mouse in the short story “Flowers for Algernon”, many creatures are experimented on daily. The mouse, Algernon, went through daily tests that displayed his artificially increased intelligence; that is, until his foreseen but nonetheless tempestuous plummet in health (Keyes, Flowers for Algernon). Animals should not be used for experimental research potentially harmful to them because it is unnecessary with our advanced technology, expensive, and testing is often followed by misled

This is a sensitive issue area in regards to research. There are many types of research that just are not feasible to do with human subjects; therefore the justification for non-human animals come into the experiment. Even though there are many benefits to using animals, many animal rights groups maintain strong opposition to using animals for research. This is why the APA has developed the Committee on Animal Research and Ethics (CARE). It is the responsibility of CARE to audit that all ethics regarding animal usage is followed (“Committee on animal,” 2014). Due to the sensitivity of testing on animals the APA has developed very strict standards regarding usage of animals as subjects. They range from justification, housing of said animal, acquisition, and procedures. These requirements outline absolute necessity in order to reduce the unnecessary usage of animals in testing.

As a scientist opens the rusty cage door, the fuzzy hamster bolts to the very edge so that the scientist would have trouble getting the mouse out. The hamster squeals, cries, and shivers, as the huge hand wraps around its body pulling the hamster out of the cage. As soon as the hand releases the hamster, the scientist injects numerous amounts of chemicals into it. The chemicals are so toxic that the mouse lost its life instantly. Even though many researchers chose to use animal testing, that is one of the many ways of research. Animal testing should no longer be needed since there are better, alternative ways to research without harming live animals.

“It is estimated that more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year. United States, up to 90 percent of the animals used in laboratories are excluded from the official statistics” ("About Animal Testing" n.d.). This is a major increase from the estimated 5.5 million tests done in 1970. Of the 115 million animals, the most commonly used are “mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, farm animals, birds, cats, dogs, mini-pigs, and non-human primates” ("About Animal Testing" n.d.). These animals and much more are subjected to torture and

Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC. Over 25 million animals are tested in labs every year. They are used for medical and scientific research. The animals used in research often undergo cruel experimentations and suffer through the pain. During medical testing, less than 2% of human illnesses are seen in animals, therefor medical testing on animals is cruel and pointless. Medical testing on animals should be illegal because products that pass animal tests end up harming or killing humans about 61% of the time.

The type of testing on the test subjects would be forcing potentially addictive, harmful drugs that mess with animal’s brains. So little is known about the brain and the complexities of human’s brains is much different from a rat or rabbit. This testing is unethical because the animals that are tested on are at risk for permanent damage, this product has little value to saving human life or bettering humans overall. Trying to argue for this attempt at releasing restrictions of animal testing is difficult unless one states that the products from the experimentation's, could develop drugs that may be able to be used on people dealing with pain and other neurological

Imagine being trapped in a cage for a lifetime. Picture being tortured through “experiments.” This is the life many animals in biomedical research are forced to live . Nowadays, most of the animal experiments are conducted on mice, rats, fish, and other animals that are excluded from the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. Animal experiments cause psychological and physical harm to the animals with a complete lack of respect for their quality of life which is why they must be banned.

Medical experimentation is permitted by laws in every country. Great apes and endangered species and other particular animals are protected by some countries from being subjects to experimentations. Very few countries and places set concrete limitations on what researchers may cause animals to suffer. Instead, laws establish standards for the humane treatment and housing of animals in labs. Laws also encourage researches to limit and seek alternatives to the use of animals (Latham 1).

“Beauty without cruelty” is the outcry that can be heard from animal right activists around the world. The FDA does not require companies to perform tests on animals but if the cosmetic product contains chemicals that can be seen as toxins, testing becomes a necessity. There are currently thirteen safety tests that are performed on animals.