preview

Animal Testing Cosmetics

Better Essays
The subject of animal testing in cosmetics has been a never-ending debate between those who approve, and those who disapprove. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines cosmetics as "articles intended to be applied to the human body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance without affecting the body's structure or functions."; this includes eye and facial makeup, skin cream, perfume, lipsticks, nail polish, moisturizers, shampoos, deodorants, scrubs, and any item that enhance one’s appearance. In the world of cosmetics, companies live up to the potential of satisfying their consumers’ needs and wants by testing their latest products on animals. The purpose of testing products on animals is for the…show more content…
Consequently, results from animal tests may not be relevant to humans, as they can under- or overestimate real-world hazards to people. Results from animal tests can be quite variable and difficult to interpret. Unreliable and ineffective animal tests mean consumer safety cannot be guaranteed.” People may argue that animal testing is necessary because it will prove the substances used are not dangerous for humans, but most testing can have unmeaningful or even disastrous effects. Harriet Williamson from Huffington Post states that “animal experiments have only a 5-25% success rate for predicting harmful human side effects. Animals pass 92% of clinical tests that humans fail, meaning that the predictions from animal testing are inconclusive and often incorrect.” Animals and humans are constantly growing and adapting to new environments and situations. Human beings and the wild creatures do not share the exact same face and skin structure, hair texture, lips, and eye anatomy. A beauty product that may affect a rabbit’s eye does not necessarily mean it will bring harm on a human’s eye. There are other replacements to testing that many companies do not look into; nearly 50 of which are non-animal tests that have been validated for use. Non-animal alternatives can combine human cell-based tests and sophisticated computer models to deliver human-relevant results in hours or days, unlike some animal tests that can take months or years. Non-animal alternatives are also typically much more cost-effective than tests that use animals (www.humanesociety.org). Alternatives such as artificial human skin and tissues that can be used for advanced testing saving thousands of animal lives each year. With all the new resources and technological advances, there is no need for animal testing and there is no need to support
Get Access