Animal Testing Is Ethical And Necessary

Better Essays
There are twenty-six million animals involuntarily tested on annually, that partake in horrendous experiments daily, to test production safety, but people don’t realize that there will always be a human tested on first. Animals have been used for the last fifty years for medical and drug research, and are supposedly able to serve as “models” for the human body, undertaking the hazardous conditions of the experiments. Animal testing is unethical and inhumane, and alternative testing methods should be more commonly used, medications and cures should be tested with more than vivisection methods to be approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), primates shouldn’t be forced into extreme testing conditions any longer, and animal subjects used for experimentation in…show more content…
In addition to the hundreds of online alternatives to animal testing, testing on volunteers and inmates is efficient, as they are humans, and the most reliable source of testing. Volunteers directly state if they wish to be taken under testing procedures, whereas animals cannot input their decisions with words or understandable communication. Another way to test is the “in vitro alternative”, which costs $11,000. It is nearly three times cheaper than “an unscheduled DNA synthesis” animal test, with the price range of $32,000 (ProCon 2016). X rays, a vaccine against yellow fever, antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs, surgical procedures for cardiac aneurysms, appendicitis, brain tumors, and cataracts have all been obtained through research done without the use of vivisection (Hurley 52). More than 98 percent of U.S. medical schools—including
Get Access