Animal Testing Is Ethical Essay

President and science spokeswoman of the Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR), Frankie Trull, resolutely stated in an interview that, “An immediate end to animal research in the U.S. would be a death sentence for millions of people around the world.” Trull supported her admission by adding, “If you’ve ever taken antibiotics, had a vaccine, had chemotherapy, an MRI, a blood transfusion, dialysis, an organ transplant, bypass surgery, or joint replacement, you have been the beneficiary of research that started with lab animals.” (The Price). To disregard these major accomplishments would be foolishly ignorant, seeing as Trull established, millions of people would not be alive without these advancements. Hundreds of millions more lives have been touched in some way by these medical breakthroughs, whether directly or secondarily. Yet the miracles discovered in the past do not define what we do in the future. The fact that animals have been considerably prominent contributors to research does not mean that this is the only route that can be taken. As previously stated, there are several alternative methods of medical research in the process of being further developed that have already proven to be suitable replacements for animal testing and experimentation. These methods’ results have even shown to be more accurate and possibly more effective than those of animal testing. The continuation of animal testing and experimentation cannot be justified by past successes. Every problem can be solved with more than one

“It is a simple fact that many, if not most, of today’s modern medical miracles would not exist if experimental animals had not been available to medical scientists. It is equally a fact that, should we as a society decide the use of animal subjects is ethically unacceptable and therefore must be stopped, medical progress will slow to a snail’s pace. Such retardation will in itself have a huge ethical ‘price tag’ in terms of continued human and animal suffering from problems such as diabetes, cancer, degenerative cardiovascular diseases, and so forth.”

Imagine a life locked away in a cage with no form of control on your existence. It’s cold, dark, and you are scared. You don’t have a choice of what you eat, where you live, or how you are treated. You are unsure if it is day or night or what will happen to you next. You are locked away in a prison cell and you committed no crime. This is the life of a laboratory animal. Animal testing is the use of animals for scientific research purposes and experiments. It can be used for the findings of cures and medicines to testing new drugs, to understanding the behavioral psychology of the animals themselves. “Around fifty to one hundred million vertebrate animals, ranging from fish to primates, are used in experiments each year” (Lloyd). There are

From when you are a baby to when you are an adult animal testing is used in your everyday products. From the Pampers you put on as a baby and the Johnson and Johnson you are washed with. To when you are older the Febreeze, Sunsilk, and Gillette you use.( Companies That do Test on Animals) Animal testing surrounds you in every act of life. “The guess is around 100 million animals are used worldwide in animal testing.” (Animal Rights) Animal testing is rooted from natural curiosity. How the insides of a living organism operate and look is an interesting idea. Because of the fact that dissection of humans was illegal by the Roman Church, animals were the second best option for knowledge of living organisms. (Animal Testing) The debate

In discussion of animal rights, one controversial issue has been whether or not animals should be use for medical testing. On the one hand, some scientists argue that animal testing has contributed for many cures and treatments. On the other hand, animal rights activist contends that alternative methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. Others even maintain that animal testing is an essential part in medical research. My own view is that animals should not be used in medical testing because is no longer necessary now there are methods that are safer and have better results than animals do.

Picture yourself in a testing laboratory; needles, drugs, and knives pointed in your direction with you having no idea what’s going on around you, this is how animals everyday are treated, we have to stop this now! Millions of animals are killed in laboratories everyday with no chance to object to what the testers are about to do to them. Animals feel as much pain as humans do so why does it make it okay to test on them when they are so alike to humans? Every day people test makeup, shampoos, and medicines on animals, the strange thing is that animals have different skin, hair, and internal organs than humans have. Since the animals have different internal organs than humans only 5-25% of the testing results are agreeable between animals

For many years, the field of science has used animals in medical experiments worldwide, because of this innocent animals are being killed everyday. They are being tested with new drugs, new treatments, and by many makeup companies. Connecticut recently celebrated the passage of the “Beagle Freedom Law”, a law that requires laboratories to work with charities and rescue groups to find homes for research cats and dogs. Animals are being tested so humans do not have to be but animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings, although animals are the closest thing to humans. Most experiments involving animals are flawed, wasting the lives of innocent animal subjects. Over 100 million animals suffer a year from testing. Testing animals is a lot more expensive than alternative methods and it is wasting government research dollars. Animal testing is not only a bad idea, but it is also inhuman and it should not be tolerated. The FDA should stop allowing animal testing. An animal does not give out the same results on a test than a human would.

are not able to give consent for this as would be required of a human. Other

Animals cannot posses’ rights, as they do not have the above capacities. The author points out that it doesn’t make sense when humans and nonhuman animals should be treated equally. A human knows that it is morally incorrect to kill a child, but an animal does not. For instance, “ Does a lion have a right to eat a baby zebra? Does a baby zebra have a right not to be eaten?”

Everyday animals are being locked up in cages and are being tested on. Animals in laboratories do not provide reliable results in human beings, and are going through cruel and inhumane tests. There are also alternative methods that replace the need for the animals. Testing animals has contributed to many life savings cures and treatments, along with animals themselves benefiting from the results of the testing. Animals are also similar to humans in many ways and are appropriate test subjects. Animal testing needs to stop because every year 100 million animals die. The animals have no say in this treatment being done to them. Animals cannot be tested in a variety of human procedures despite what the benefits are.

There are twenty-six million animals involuntarily tested on annually, that partake in horrendous experiments daily, to test production safety, but people don’t realize that there will always be a human tested on first. Animals have been used for the last fifty years for medical and drug research, and are supposedly able to serve as “models” for the human body, undertaking the hazardous conditions of the experiments. Animal testing is unethical and inhumane, and alternative testing methods should be more commonly used, medications and cures should be tested with more than vivisection methods to be approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), primates shouldn’t be forced into extreme testing conditions any longer, and animal subjects used for experimentation in

Humans are animals, and as such it is morally wrong to use them to test pharmaceuticals intended for use by humans. Those who support animal experimentation believe it is a necessary evil, in part due to the false information put out by the media. The so-called benefits of animal testing have not helped humans for years, yet in many countries the law still requires researchers use animals to test their medications. In fact, although alternatives have been found, few steps have been taken to put an end to animal experimentation. Unfortunately, the way the activists present their argument that is one main reason they are not taken seriously, even though their points are valid. Animal testing is morally wrong and has not benefited humans as the media has claimed, but there are alternatives, such as new technology, if only humans would take the first step.

Repeatedly throughout history animals have been used for biomedical research. Animal protection and animal rights groups have severely criticized the practice of using animals for biomedical research in its recent years. To make the practice of animal testing more ‘humane’, laws have been passed in several countries

The bioethical dilemma that I used in Module 1 was concerning animal testing and if it is reasonable to use animals in order for humans to advance scientifically, specifically in medicine. There are several individuals who feel as if animals are tortured needlessly. Although this is a popular viewpoint surrounding animal medicine, there are numerous rules and regulations ensuring that the animals are taken care of and treated humanely at all times, a couple of which are the IACUC Guidelines and the Animal Welfare Act (references below). These provide a framework so that the animals are not abused and we as a people may still conduct research in order to work towards various cures and treatments for the ill individuals in our society. The dilemma is that most individuals feel a moral obligation to ensure that animals are treated well and unfortunately media coverages are incomplete at best, leading those who are suspicious to

This bioethics research paper will be talking about animal rights. Animal rights is the rights for animals to be free of medical research, hunting, clothing, food, and entertainment. It is the belief that all animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and should not have to suffer from humans. (Liou, 2010) The belief is opposite of those who believe in speciesism. Speciesism is the idea that humans and their rights are above animals. The people who are against animal rights are known as speciesist. (Bennett-Jones, 2015) The people who are for animal rights are known as animal rights advocates or activists. (Lin, 2014)