Animal Testing: Is It Right Or Wrong?

Back in 2006 slate.com conducted a study that showed that “the source for humans suffering may be the dozens promising drugs that are put aide when they have side effects in animals that are not relevant for humans.

All drugs have dangers due to certain chemicals and substances. Because of animal testing, researchers have found another alternative to testing on humans.

It is no secret that millions of animals a year are used for medical experimentation. One study “found the number of animals tested rose from 1,566,994 in 1997 to 2,705,772 in 2012” (Casey). It is my belief that researchers use virtue theory to defend their experimentations. While animal activists approach experimentation through the ethics of care. I am against animal experimentation, but I will also provide insight into why people believe it is ethically just.

The author emphasizes in biological difference between human beings and animals meaning drugs safe for animals might not be safe for humans. It argues that the FDA should not mandate animal testing and should look to the alternative methods for evidence that supports drug approval. Author suggests many alternative methods other then animal testing that can make drugs more efficient and safe for human use, consequently saving animals from experimental cruelty which provides excellent quotations for the research paper.

Although, there has been successful experiments with animal testing, the percentage is low. Many drugs tested on animals that were released to humans had serious side effects and killed or harmed people effectively. Some examples of pharmaceutical drugs that were deemed safe for human use were later found to have serious side effects, like isuprel is a medication used to treat ashma - in Great Britain alone, 3,500 asthamatics died using this. This shows animal testing is in fact very dangerous to humans.

Whether animal experimentation is justified or not has been undecided for many decades. Many years back, the debate was carried out by animal rights groups which were led by the Cambridge University to get rid of its plan for a primate research in 2004. Since this debate, many supporters have become more confident in speaking out what they believe and getting their points across to people.

Scientists have been using animals to test medical treatments that could be used on humans, if it does well with the animal. Testing on an animal could help find a new discovery, but it could also put the animal in danger. Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year. A 2013 study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) found that nearly 150 clinical trials of treatments to reduce inflammation in critically ill patients have been undertaken, and all of them failed, despite being successful in animal tests. Animals should not be used to test medical procedures and treatments that would be later on used for humans.

To begin with, animal experimentation provides unreliable test results because of the differences between animals and humans. In the article, Animal Testing is Not Essential for Medical Research, Ray C. Greek and Jean Swingle Greek said,”More than half of the medications released between 1976 and 1985 were taken off the market or relabeled because dangerous side effects were discovered that had not been found in animal experiments.” Many drugs have been found to have unpredicted side effects so testing on animals just shows researchers what the drug would do to animals, not humans. Since the point of animal testing is to test the effectiveness and results of a drug, it

First, the reaction to drugs in animals bodies are different from the reaction in humans. When testing on animals it puts pressure on the animal and can give them a heart attack which leads

Is animal testing ethically acceptable? Is it acceptable for animals to suffer for the testing of medicine? Although there are alternatives, animal testing is by far the most productive, accurate, and beneficial form of research. Animal testing is necessary for many reasons, including to advance in medicine, to prevent harmful tests on humans, and to establish a solid research background. In this essay, the facts represented will be convincing evidence that animal testing is a necessity for advancement in the medical world.

Did you know that animals die from animal testing? I bet that you thought most animals survived animal testing. But the truth is that animal testing is an inconsistent way of finding cures for harmful diseases and it is cruel to the animals that those cures are tested on, these animals are dying from the world around them. Some people say that animal testing is a good way finding cures to diseases. Here are three reasons that prove their point is wrong, Both humans and animals die from animal testing, Animal testing brings down the economy, and Animal testing is animals cruelty

Either the animal can't get the human issue or the animal is immune to the responses that the drug causes. By then when human endeavour the "course of action" examiners are amazed to the point that there failed research was so insufficient and recognized stunning signs like visual inadequacy or annihilation.

In order to meet the FDA regulations, many companies would often expose thousands of animals such as rats, rabbits and dogs to harmful drugs. Most of these drugs are often rejected when exposed to actual human subjects. According to the FDA, “A new medicinal compound entering Phase 1 testing, often representing the culmination of upwards of a decade of preclinical screening and evaluation, is estimated to have only an 8 percent chance of reaching the market”(Critical Path Opportunities Reports - Challenges and Opportunities Report). In short, only 8 percent of drugs that are tested actually work on humans, and 92 percent fail when tested. This is simply because the species diverse too much and the results achieved from animal testing are at

For centuries animals have been using by researchers as tools for human medications. Researchers admit that they are getting closer to find the cure for the terminal illnesses like cancer or AIDS. But in fact the cure for cancer that researchers found by using mice, did not work in humans as it did in mice. Animals have different biological systems than humans do and they do not suffer from the diseases as the way humans do. Therefore the tests cannot be accurate. “The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous. And of the small percentage that is approved for human use, half are relabeled because

Drugs that were effective when tested on animals failed in humans. Nearly 150 clinic trail (human tests) treatment fails despite successful in animal testing. . (“Footnotes & Sources-Animal Testing” 58, 59). We are not a fifty pound rat. Toxicology stated animal experiments versus human data puts strong doubt of the usefulness to predict human safety. . (“Footnotes & Sources-Animal Testing” 60). What’s the point of using animals if there data doubts human