Animal Testing Is Unnecessary

Although there have been significant medical breakthroughs based in animal testing and experimentation, animal testing is a poor method of science as it is largely useless and

animal testing is an unnecessary method that should no longer be practiced in today’s society.

Animal testing has been a controversial topic for many generations throughout the world. People against animal testing say that animal testing is cruel and inhumane and

Animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings. A study from ProCon.org stated that, “94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials.” This shows that testing on animals may not be as helpful as it may seem. It is not useful to test on animals when there still must be even more tests to make sure that the medical treatments are safe since the animal tests are not accurate. The tests need to be accurate to know that the medical treatment works well

Scientists say animal testing helps scientists advance in more scientific understanding, by using animals as models and mimicking the complexity of a human. This is exactly why we shouldn't use animals to mock a human. Because a human is extremely complex, the complexity and intricacy is precisely why animals are not good models for human medicine. We differ from animals genetically and metabolically, so data we obtain from animals cannot be assumed to work for humans. For example, cancer was cured for mice, but when tried on humans, it failed - because of the fact that we differ from

Animals are not a reliable benchmark for testing because animals and humans have a completely different biological make up. In fact, PETA said that 72% of drugs shown to be effective in humans, have a different response in humans or are harmful to the body (Animal Testing Is Bad Science Point/Counterpoint). Disregarding the fact that some animal testing trials make it to human trials about 100,000 humans lose lives each year from taking prescriptions originally tested on animals(Animal Aid). Concluding that even if tests were to be done on animals, the drugs are not always safe, proving that animal testing can take more lives than needed and is horrifically

Animal testing can have a different meaning for each individual, it can be both cruel and helpful in everyday life.

Animals are very different than humans and therefore they make poor test subjects. They make poor test subjects because of the cellular, metabolic, and anatomic differences. Animals act, look, and are made very differently compared to humans. How will you be sure the product will not be harmful just because it didn’t hurt an animal? Approximately 92% of experimental drugs are dangerous of humans even though it did not affect the animal. [Cruelty]

Animal testing has been an issue for years. From hearing ads on the news to seeing protests on the streets, most American citizens know what animal testing is. It has always been a problem for us as humans. But not only is it just a problem, it is a cruel, harsh and almost absolutely pointless one. Everyday, animals are subjected to painful and harsh tests that hardly even work. Most of these inhumane tests

What is worse is that, all too often, the results of such tests are invalid, since animals' organisms are not the same as our own. Animals

To begin, one of the most important reasons why animal testing should be unacceptable, is because the human species is very different compared to any other animal; therefore, they make unreliable test subjects. For example, according to PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), they found that nearly 150 clinical trials [human tests] of treatments, to reduce inflammation in critically ill patients, have been undertaken, and all of them failed, despite all the animal tests being successful (Should Animals Be Used for

Animal testing is unnecessary because there are alternative testing methods that are more accurate and less time consuming. For example Microdosing, Artificial human skin, Microfluidic chips and computer models are all humane alternatives to inhumane animal testing. According to www.neavs.org "... skin corrosivity and irritation can be easily measured using three-dimensional human skin equivalent systems such as EpiDerm and SkinEthic." In conclusion, animal testing is unnecessary because it's time consuming, inaccurate and inhumane, yet scientists continue to use it when there are better alternatives to it.

Although many people argue that animal testing makes a lot of medical advancements, most of the experiments are flawed. First of all, according to procon.org “9 out of 10 drugs that appear safe in animal studies fail in humans.” This argues the point that animals and humans aren’t the same. While we have some similarities, they are not the same so we should not be testing on them. In the same matter, procon.org also says, “ 87% of the studies failed to randomize the animal selection.” This means that they are using the same animals for the tests and they are using the same type of animals. In short, most of the experiments are flawed, the drugs don’t work on humans, and they are failing to randomize animal selection.

Lastly, because animal experimentation is misleading, it can result in death and harm for humans. Animal testing does help humans find cures and helpful treatments, but most of the times it doesn’t. Just because a substance proves to be safe for animals, it doesn’t mean the same thing for humans. For example, an arthritis drug called Vioxx had successful results when tested on animals and was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, but was later recalled after more than 20,000 people had heart attacks more than 38,000 people died from taking the

115 Million animals die each year in scientific laboratories at universities and other research industries.Do you want to add to that number or fight the cause.Pharmaceutical industries murder an unimaginable number of animals through animal experimentation.