Animal Testing Is Wrong?

Human’s have made innumerable advancements in the world we live in however in doing so, the progression of ethical and moral decisions made upon animal testing and vivisection have failed to strive simultaneously. In this paper I will affirm with the central claim that it is wrong to cause unnecessary suffering ought to be extended to the practice of vivisection. Innocent animals should not be put through these harsh environments of inflicted pain for the sake of a slight potential gain in human living. I believe this because these animals cannot represent themselves and vocalize their willful consent in the practice and will not be able to comprehend the pain and suffering caused during testing periods. The most common objection proposed to this claim however, would be the explained rationale behind why this form of testing occurs and the benefits it has shown in enhancing human and non-human existence. Although these considerations arise, it is still found to be unethical to cause unnecessary harm and suffering to any live animal in the name of science to supposedly gain a successful medical treatment or household product. Animal welfare representatives will continue to conclude that there is no valid justification for

According to the BBC “2.73 million experiments in the months of 2002”(). The issue of animal testing affects the animals being tested on and could affect citizens too. I disagree with animal testing because it hurts the animals being tested on and there are alternatives to it, for example in vitro testing. This issue is important because if animals go extinct then the animals that help our environment will all die, and then we will have to put in more work and more money to clean up or fix it. I would like animal testing to be banned or more strict. Examples of this would be changing the Animal Welfare Act, make the inspectors be more strict on violations, or ban animal testing.

Thousands of animals are hurt and even killed because of animal testing every year. Scientists use animals of all kinds, apes, mice, rabbits, cats, etc. to experiment on. These experiments range from giving them drugs, to see what effect they might have on humans, to testing what extreme heat would do to the human body. The outcome of these experiments are often harm and even death. Animal testing is not morally justified because it causes harm to live animals, there are suitable alternatives to animal testing, and there are too many differences between humans and animals to be able to call the outcome “Accurate”.

It 's on the internet, it 's in magazines, it 's even on the news. Animal testing is a major debate among both academics and everyday people. The most common animals used in testing ae mice, rats, and apes. Some people think that animal testing is obsolete in this day and age but it isn 't obsolete because animal testing helps determine what chemicals are potentially harmful to humans, it helps determine what medicines are potentially safe for human use, and it helps advance other areas of science too, not just medicine.

On Earth, humans must coexist with the many types of animals and respect them as equals on their shared territory. Animals are not treated as equals and therefore the animals are suffering from the harm that humans are inflicting on them through animal testing experimentation. These acts of animal experimentation have caused a decrease in the number of some species of animals, while others have broken several rights that animals have and are protected under The Animal Welfare Act. Animal experimentation is wrong because people use animals for beauty product testing, cloning, and medical research which violates animal rights. Animal experimentation is occurring through several different selfish acts by humans. We as humans use animals for our own benefits and do not take the animals into consideration.

The question is not, "Can they reason?" nor, "Can they talk?" but rather, "Can they suffer?"

Animal testing is extremely unfair for those animals, and it is a kind of cruel and immoral behavior. To be honest, we cannot ignore it. However, when it comes to animals having right to live, eating animals must be mentioned. I want to ask if you care about the feeling of the animals that you want to eat. Everyone wants to live longer, and there is no doubt that animals want to. If animals have right to live as human beings do, why do you eat animals like sheep and chicken? Humans are at the top of the food chain, so it is normal for humans to eat animals, especially the common animals whose number is very large. Those animals used to do research are usually rabbits, frogs and other common animals, and to an extent, animal testing is equal to eating animals. Eating animals can provide energy to our bodies, and sometimes animal testing can benefit mankind and save those who are going to die. We can accept eating animals, so why not accept animal testing? Besides, animal testing is much more beneficial than eating animals. Therefore, animal testing should be

The method of using animals for testing of human products has been a controversial issue for the last thirty years. Animal testing has been a considerably debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong. Animal testing is wrong because of the other side says that animals are the closest things to humans. Testing on animals harms the animals and does not do us any good.

Animal testing is inhumane. There have millions of innocent animals that have suffered a vicious, painful death due to animal testing. In research labs, animals are screamed at, beaten, and stuffed into small cages when researchers are done using them. Dissection at schools is also wrong. They cut open defenseless animals, just to see how there insides work. Animals and humans aren't even exactly alike. “92% out of every 100 drugs that passed animal testing failed clinical trials on people,” . Every year in the United

Animal testing, also known as “animal experimentation”, has been used throughout history. The early Greek physicians, including Erasistratus and Aristotle, used animals in experiments as early as 384 BC. Animal testing is the experimentation on species other than humans for research purposes. Animal testing is used in a variety of ways including the making of cosmetics and personal products to the development of procedures and medications for use in the medical profession. I believe that animal testing in general is wrong and there can be alternatives.

For decades, animal experimentation has been a hot topic in society. People debate whether or not it is ethically right. Scientist claim that it is better to test products on animals rather than humans because they think a human life is more valuable than that of an animal. Does animal experimentation have an effect on human results anyway? In fact, “The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has said that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don't work or are dangerous” (“Animal Testing”). There are clinical trials that use humans to be the first of humans to try a new product or medication anyway, so why go through the process of using animals to test it first? There

Animal testing is morally wrong. Tests are done on monkeys, guinea pigs, mice, rabbits, cats, dogs, and many other animals. These animals are exposed to chemicals and are sometimes purposefully injured to observe recovery (if there is any). “9 out of 10 candidates that appear safe and effective in animal studies fail when given to humans”(About Animal Testing). These animals are put through terrible tests and awful living conditions, and despite the efforts, some are inaccurate. Scientists still conduct experiments partially because they get better pay that way (Starer). Using animals lives for human benefit and profit is cruel and cold-hearted.

Mahatma Gandhi once said, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” Gandhi makes a really firm point by saying that the moral situation of a country or nation can be seen by the way they treat animals. Then why does millions of animals die each year due to animal experimentation. Animal experimentation is inhumane and morally wrong. Also scientifically it is unreliable due to the unknown variables that scientists cannot figure out. The hidden truth is that ninety percent of drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans. Animal experimentation has lost its reliability and ethical values against both humans and animals. Many animals are burned, crushed, shocked, poisoned, and infected.

A quote from an experimenter showed his view on animal testing “Because the animals are like us.” Experimenters were asked why it is ok to test animals the answer would be “Because the animals are not like us.”

The words "animal testing" mean to perform procedures on living animals for the research of basic human biology and diseases, finding out the effectiveness of new medical products, and testing the human health and environmental safety of consumer and industry products like cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals and means using other living organisms except humans for testing. All procedures, even those classified as “mild,” have the potential to cause the animals physical as well as psychological distress and suffering and sometimes even death. Often the procedures can cause a great deal of suffering and it can end in death of the test subject. Most animals are killed at the end of an experiment, but some may be reused in subsequent experiments and then killed.