Essay on Animal Testing

For many years there has been an ongoing debate on whether or not animals should be given rights, even there own bill of rights. Some who are against the animal bill of rights argue that testing products on animals is important to the safety of humans. Others who want the new bill of rights claim that animals have feelings and that science is treating them inhumanely. Animal activists also add that animals are intelligent beings and are aware of how they are treated. Based on science proving animal activists correct on many of their points, this calls for a new bill of rights, in the United States, especially written for the protection and care of wild and domestic animals.

Animals are beaten and abused on a daily basis due to barbaric individuals. Whether it be from harmful intentions or pure negligence most cases go unreported. “Deliberate cruelty may involve beating, shooting, stabbing animals, or setting them on fire. Neglect is not giving a necessary food, water, shelter, or vet care” (Human Society). The lack of attention and care for these animals can often lead to severe, and sometimes irrevocable damage. The Animal Legal Defense Fund, ALDF for short, website tells of one story where neighbors of a farm complained to the local humane society, “that the Colliers were neglecting many animals on their farm, including dogs and horses. When they went to their property to investigate, they discovered dogs and horses in several states of neglect and starvation and seized them out of concern for their immediate health”(ALDF). Sadly, however, it can become much worse for animals. Owners will sometimes purposefully abuse their animals. Unfortunately, occurrences like these are hardly uncommon. One such example, from the RSPCA of England, the Royal

(Animal Laws) Even though England kicked off the idea of anti-cruelty with their laws in 1910, that made it necessary to take careful records of numbers of animals used for testing. Not only in the testing facilities but also in the the farm, laws were passed. Humane Methods of Slaughter Act required slaughter houses to stun animals before slaughtering. (Animal Testing) Despite the wide-spread thought that animal testing facilities are filled with cages and unethical methods, most if not all are now under strict rulings, that they are very cleanly. Almost hospital like. Dick Biancos a biomedical researcher invites high school students into his lab to see the just and sterile ways they animal test. To show them how a animal testing facility actually runs, not what they assume from stories. (Decline in Support of Using Animals).

The idea of animal rights has been around for centuries. Even decades ago, people were taking action for the welfare of animals. Marc Bekoff and Ned Hettinger share this idea all the way back in 1994 when they said that there is evidence that scientist are concerned with animal welfare by acknowledge that they use the guidelines in place to protect animals during research, in order to have their work published (Bekoff 219). Guidelines are the basis for the moral and ethical treatment of animals. Each person may have his or her own standard, but having a standard among the entire population ensures the welfare of the animals. Unfortunately, these standards are not at a level to where the animals are being protected. Many animals in captivity are treated in ways that would shock the average person. Orcas for example, are starved until they do the desired task (Cowperthwaite). This form of operant condition can lead to success, but often leads to resentment and hostility towards the trainers.

Many people may not know that animal cruelty has been around for hundreds of years. . In the article "Animal Cruelty Prosecution" published by American Prosecution Research Institute found that, The Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Colony established “The Body of Liberties” found by the Animal Cruelty Prosecution, in 1641. The Body of Liberties was a document written for the protection of animals from unnecessary pain and suffering. Animal cruelty happens every day whether it is from starving, beating, lack of medical care or proper housing for animals. We are in need of stricter laws to help fight the rights of animals. Animal laws should be more strict on people

Many organizations and other people who fight for the animals, have been successful and established laws. For animal testing, “Federal laws were made to ensure to the public that animals were being treated as well as possible. They try to be as gentle as they can and treat them with care. They have no intention of the animals to be harmed. If they are not harmed, that is wonderful because that indicates the product that is being tested is safe for humans” ( ). This demonstrates that people are showing some compassion towards the animals and are trying their best to treat them properly. In addition, animals are living things and should be treated equally to humans. Also, "Laws around the world vary. Usually they depend on either

Specific organizations, laws, and acts are just a few of the many examples Latham uses to support his thoughts and ideas on reform concerning the controversial subject of animal experimentation in the United States. All throughout the article, Latham mentions numerous organizations and laws that are affiliated with the United States concerning animal experimentation. Some of these organizations and laws mentioned throughout the entire article include the Animal Welfare Act of 1966, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.

Right now, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside cold, barren cages in laboratories across the country. They languish in pain, ache with loneliness, and long to roam free and use their minds. Instead, all they can do is sit and wait in fear of the next terrifying and painful

There are nearly 26 million animals in the United States who are tested for commercial and scientific use. The AWA- Animal Welfare Act- provides limitations on which animals institutions and scientists can use. Since 1850, the AWA protected about 1,134,693 animals, but has left about 25 million other animals to be scientifically and commercially used. The fact that there are about 25 million animal species not protected by the AWA has many people against animal testing. The AWA sets minimum housing standards and also requires regular inspections by veterinarians. The animals not protected by the Animal Welfare Act are fish, birds, rats, and other cold blooded animals, which make up 95% of the animals being tested on; and because these

This act was created to regulate the treatment of animals in research. According to the USDA, the Animal Welfare Act requires that each research facility must contain an International Animal Committee as a representative of the public’s concerns regarding animal rights and treatment. The committee must consist of at least three members, including a veterinarian and one in which knows nothing of the institution. The AWA has high housing standards for all research animals, such as access to food and water, enclosure size, and temperature of the room. To keep all in order, there must be regular inspections by veterinarians. Any and all propositions to use animals for research must be pre-approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. It is enforced that all treatment and interactions with animals must be humane. All research animals are cared for by veterinarians, husbandry specialists, and animal health technicians to ensure their well-being and safety, as well as more accurate research. Nature Genetics states that stressed and crowded animals do not produce reliable research results, and many observable characteristics are only accessible in at ease animals with an enhanced environment in which to live. It is in the best interests of the

This bars feathered animals, fish, rats, cold blooded animals and farm animals (regardless of warm or cold blood) from experimentation. This Act requires reports on the testing and treatment of all creatures, but, allows testing that many feel goes too far. The strongest support for animal testing and analysis is that there has been a plethora of groundbreaking, lifesaving and substantial advancements in the field of medical science on account of the experimentation performed on animals. Studies have demonstrated that in the course of 100 years, real leaps forward in medical science were found through animal testing (no less than 85 percent). If not for puppies, insulin never would have been made in medicinal labs for the treatment of diabetes. Without chimpanzees, an immunization for Hepatitis B never would have been found. There are numerous different cures and antibodies that have been made and discovered because of testing. The absence of human volunteers and stringent laws about the misuse of a human being make animals a likely source. Animals have numerous biological structures that are fundamentally the same to a human’s that they are the ideal substitute for a one. Their organs work like a human’s, and many are smaller in size, making it less demanding for specialists and researchers to learn and study with. Since many medical studies include potentially poisonous materials, it is unlawful to put a man

“The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” - Mahatma Gandhi. These famous words still ring true in today’s society as we struggle to overcome the scientific experimentation on animals. Animals have acted as the archstone of human civilization since the dawn of man, from a source of food, to companionship. However, in the past century, we have been blurring the line between environmental entitlement and environmental rape. Every member of the human race interacts and depends on animals, and we owe them a certain level of respect in our society. Animal Experimentation should be banned in all forms within the borders of the United States; prohibited under an expansion of the Animal Welfare Act. This paper will explore the problems, causes and solutions pertaining to animal experimentation.

According to the Worldwide Animal Research Statistics (2017), an estimated 25 million animals are used to conduct scientific and commercial experiments in the United States. These testings provide data to develop medical treatments and cures, determine the toxicity and the safeness of medication or products designed for human usage, and other biomedical, health care, and commercial uses. Animal testing is regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act, which was passed in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985. They define an animal as “any live or dead dog, cat, monkey (nonhuman primate mammal), guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, or such other warm blooded animal.” This excludes birds, rats, and mice bred for research, cold-blooded organisms, and farm animals used for food and other purposes. The AWA regulates housing and transportation of animals for

Imagine being experimented on daily, only to result in being locked up in a enclosure with nothing and nobody. Envision being deprived, isolated and used over and over again. Undoubtedly, animals go through these situations constantly with nothing but themselves. Scientist develop theories and statements, with the aid of animals, for a better understanding of life threatening diseases, when in reality their experiments keep animals secluded and distressed. When confronted with animal cruelty many people have mixed emotions of disgust and rage which eventually leads to combat for justice. Although experiments executed on animals may be useful for understanding life threatening diseases, it is brutal and can proceed to failure of the experiment, as well as deprivation and isolation of the organism.

The act was most recently amended in 1985, when Senator Dole attached it as a rider to that year’s farm bill. The amendment requires animal-care committees established at every research facility to review planned experiments and procedures involved. Each committee must also have one public representative as an equal voting member (United States Code 7:2131).