Animal Testing Pros And Cons

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. “Medical Testing on Animals Is Cruel and Unnecessary.” Medical Testing, edited by Noel Merino, Greenhaven Press, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints In Context, http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010895214/OVIC?u=scschools&sid=OVIC&xid=8250ef38. Accessed 25 Apr. 2018. Originally Published as “Animal Experiments: Overview,”, 2012.

The issue of animal testing is a widespread and very controversial topic. It entails carrying out torturous and harmful tests and experiments on animals (most commonly mice or rats, but also other animals like rabbits and guinea pigs) for scientific research, whether it be for medical causes, products or cosmetics. In many cases, animal testing is unavoidable – it is impossible to rid the world of something humans rely on so dearly; however, it is imperative that we recognize the moral impacts of our actions and stop relying on it as a major research tactic. It is quite odd that it continues to be commonly used, despite being largely ineffective, the abundance of alternatives available, and the moral issues it brings into light.

When a young girl is looking at a magazine ad for the latest eyeshadow makeup, she notices that the model has on a shade of eyeshadow that looks gorgeous, but did she ever considered how that eyeshadow was manufactured? That makeup product was more than likely tested on animals for eye and skin irritation. Many research labs are using defenseless animals for testing and unnecessary experiments. There are three different types of people that have different thoughts. The one type of person really does not seem to bring the situation to life, and pushes it to the back of their mind, while the other type of person stands for animal testing because it may help save someone's life. Many people believe it is alright for animals to be used for extensive examining and those people think that since animals have similar biological DNA, scientists can use them for testings. Although, there are people who believe that animal testing is not okay, and does not need to exist. People who think that animal testing is bad will say that animal testing can be torture. During the act of animal testing, animals have no say in being tested on. It can be considered animal cruelty. Animals are not treated fairly after being tested on. Animal testing is not always reliable with data. Animals should not be used in medical and/or cosmetic lab testing for several compelling reasons.

Animal testing is an intense shared subject, with an enormous deal of emotion, passion, and thoughts on both sides concerning the ethics of this practice. In attendance there is a grey area as well, as some people support animal testing only under special situations whereas they contest its use for other

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) states that every year, more than 100 million animals, such as mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds, are all killed every year in U.S, Laboratories. Testing infects animals with diseases that they would not normally infect them, chemicals blind innocent kittens, tiny mice grow tumors as large as their own bodies, and rats suffer seizures. These unnecessary outcomes make sure that a product is safe for human use. The reality is that the majority of animal experiments do not contribute to improving human health. It is ridiculous when animals are tested on because they have done absolutely nothing to deserve being harmed. Using humans as test subjects would be far less wasteful and far more efficient for the whole human race. Humans would serve as even better test subjects because they can verbally express the pain and the specific effects of various cosmetics where as animals can only squeal and

Animal testing has been a controversial problem in today’s society and it affects people from all over the world1 not just animal activists or scientists. Most of the products and medicines used today have been tested on animals. These animals used in experiments have been thought to only benefit society but morally this hurts our society. This hurts our society because now animal testing has become a social normality and then humans have started to become null to this as time goes on. This slippery slope will only get worse if this is not stopped. This also hurts our society because scientist, physicians, and lawmakers must decide the justification for

Though it seems clear that due to globalisation and westernisation, the winners may be those fighting for the eradication of animal testing. This was not only evident through the opinions disclosed in my questionnaire but also in the empowerment of organisations and campaigns; which are increasingly affecting legislation and policies throughout the world.

This book was a really good source for two reasons. I used this source a lot in my paper not just quoting what the author said, but also using the case studies. The case studies helped me a lot because they usually worked as examples of abuse and neglect..The case studies helped me a out because, there was a lot of good ones that talked a lot about what exactly is happening in labs. They talk about a lot of stuff that people don't really know what's going on in the labs. This book also had a few really good quotes that I used. That is why this book was a really good source to use.

Each side of the animal rights debate have many legitimate points for their argument. Supporters of animal testing believe that it helps the development of many life-saving treatments for animals and humans, there is no alternative approach because they are similar to human beings and rigorous regulations prevent exploitation of animals in laboratories. Opponents of animal testing believe that it cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, there are other approaches available to researchers, animal tests don’t predict the results on humans and that animals have tests forced upon them, with no choice. Although it is an expensive way of testing and at the same time, it is cruel and inhumane, animal testing brings more medical advancement to

Animal testing is appalling. Research on live animals has been around since at least 500 BC; people and scientists still think it isn’t such a bad thing.

Many of the products we use everyday are being tested on animals. Many don’t give a second thought to what is being done to these animals to produce these products. The animals that are being used for research are treated inhumanly and aren't given the proper care that they are suppose to be given by law. Many of the animal handlers take advantage of the fact that these animals can’t express how much pain that they are causing them when being used as test subjects or being kept in small cages. There are those that believe animals don’t have rights but little do they know that any living thing has as many rights as humans do. The Animal Welfare Act needs to be better implemented to combat animal cruelty because the current law is not being

On the opposite side of the spectrum, supporters strongly argue a multitude of reasons why animal testing has been and will continue to be the best form of experimentation for upcoming products in the market. The first and most prominent reason is that testing on animals “has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments,” including medication for cancer, severe injuries, leukemia, and more (“Should Animals Be Used”). Not only do these medical advancements bring significant progress into the scientific field, but they are also the only adequate form of testing which fully reveals all the responses that would be mirrored in human beings. The pro side, as established by ProCon.org, commonly articulates that:

There is many pros and cons when it comes to animal testing in many industries. Animals have been used for testing for many decades in recent history, and even in the present. There are many types of animal testing, the more popular ones been in used for makeup, scientific experiments, clothing brands and more. At first, hearing about animal testing is a sad and cruel thing to do or think of. But the number one reason why we do it, is for the safety of human lives. The reason why it is the number one reason is to save human lives from any defects that can harm the user. One big piece of evidence that proved that animal testing should be taking into consideration and use is the Thalidomide disaster. The Thalidomide disaster happened because

In contrast, some people do not see anything wrong with animal testing due to the fact that animals do not have rights, therefore it is acceptable to use them as test subjects. Others argue that all animal experimentation should end because it is wrong to treat animals merely as tools for furthering human knowledge. There is much disagreement as to whether non-human animals have rights, as in animal rights. Animal rights teach humans that certain things are wrong as a matter of principle. According to this point of view, an animal should have as much right as a human being to live a full life, free of pain and suffering in labs. On the other hand, people believe it is wrong to unnecessarily abuse animals, but testing on animals must continue because of the enormous scientific resource animal models provide. Almost all humans grow up wearing leather, eating meat, and going to circuses and zoos. However, humans never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. While there are few laws regarding animal testing, there are none that have to do with animal rights. The AWA, Animal Welfare Act, is a federal law which addresses the expectations and standards of care in which animals must receive at research facilities and laboratories (“ProCon” 1). At the same time, U.S. laws allow animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, and brain-damaged. Animal rights is not just a philosophy, it is a social movement that challenges society’s traditional view that all nonhuman animals exist solely for human use. Animals have been treated differently than humans by nearly every culture throughout recorded history. If humans begin to treat animals the same now, humans would have to become vegetarians and hunting would be

Observation and experimentation are how we as humans have been able to learn more about ourselves and the world and universe we live in. One of the most common methods of experimentation is animal testing. However, there are controversies surrounding animal testing. There are some that believe animal testing to be cruel and overdone, advocating for the eradication of the practice and further reliance alternative research methods. Groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and other animal rights advocates fall in this category. There are some that believe animal testing to be an invaluable resource and should continue, such as some scientists and research groups. However, there appears to me to be a consensus that is closer to the middle: the belief and understanding that while there are benefits to animal testing, there are flaws in the practice and there should be changes to increase its efficacy while we simultaneously explore alternate testing methods. Many scientists and the National Institute of Health (NIH) subscribe to this idea. I aim to explore the benefits, problems, and implications of animal testing in order to reach a more informed conclusion about a position that is most validated by the information I have used.