Animal Testing Research Paper

Within our society, we as humans have many ethical issues that we must discuss in order to progress. Even with all these issues many individuals don't look to understand animals and their rights to be free as well as healthy. Many companies use animals as test subjects in order to analyze or enhance their products. These tests come with cruelty or diminishing of that animals life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. There are also issues with the intermediate conditions and excessive constraints of livestock. Some areas in the United States don't have restrictions on how these matters must be regulated or fixed. In order to become an ethically correct and moral society, we must include animals in the moral community of pain and pleasure.

Animals can be burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused as a result of testing. And the list could go on forever. The way animals are being mistreated and tested on should be against the law. There is a different ways to do research other than killing and abusing animals. There are many alternate test that scientist can use to do there research without harming animals. Alternative test are defined as test that use the three “R’s”, a test that replaces a procedure that uses animals with one that doesn’t, a test that reduces the number of animals used in a procedure, and test that refine a procedure to cause less pain to the animal.(11 Facts about…)

For the food and farming industry animals are a business of more than 9.7 billion dollars a year. These animals are livestock raised. New laws are protecting this animal and when companies don’t follow the laws they get criminal charges. The use of animals has also helped in the medical field with human life. This type of animals has also been regulated by the FDA. Rats and mice are the most used animals for lab testing. If we believe that animals should not have rights because they don´t have rationality, we also have to remember that baby human don´t have rationality either. For this reason, animals have

“Nearly as many, 68 percent, were concerned or very concerned about the well-being of animals used in ‘sports’ or contests as well as animals in laboratories (67 percent) (Kretzer, 1).” Many people question whether an animal is capable of thought and emotions. Others feel as though animals are the equivalent of humans and should be treated as such. Since the 1800’s, animal rights has been a topic that has several different sides including two extremes. If animals can react to their environment, emote, and are aware of things done to or with them, then they should have similar rights to humans.

When discussing the issues faced from an ethical standpoint of animal rights it is important to consider the benefits animals bring to people and then question what rights animals are entitled to due to this (Fisher). Taking that into account, one must ask if giving them rights could possibly overstep on human rights and would animals even be able to enjoy rights (Fisher). It is often debated that the benefits and knowledge through experimentation of animals have led to life-saving advancements in the field of science and medicine (Fisher). The other side of the debate argues that even if these past benefits are justified, these type of experiments are no longer necessary and it is deemed unacceptable that wrongful treatment of animals is done for this purpose (Fisher). When it comes to the question of

An estimated fifty-six billion animals are slaughtered every year just for human consumption. The consumption of these animals is now redundant and wasteful because meat and dairy products are not necessary for the majority of human’s survival. Humans should stop eating animals and animal by-products because it is morally wrong, this is due to the fact that many of the animals humans consume can feel pain. Humans should stop eating other animals if it is not essential for their survival. In addition, the conditions that animals are subjected to in farms and slaughterhouses are harsh. Moreover, the amount of grain that is required to feed farmed animals is high and can be used to feed humans instead of animals that will inevitably be killed

Is it fair to do experiments on a helpless animal for the benefits of human beings? No,it is not fair to do experiments on helpless animals. Animal testing is when cruel and harmful experiments are done on innocent animals for specific reasons such as saving human lives. In animal testing, they take these innocent little animals and run horrible,cruel, and graphic test on them. "An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing." (Humane Society International n.p.). So many different kinds of animals are taken captive to be tested on these gruesome experiments. There are many experiments

Within the European Union, over 12 million animals are used for animal testing yearly. Over 3 million of these laboratory rabbits were used in Great Britain. In 2014, around 834,453 animals total were used for laboratory testing in the United States; 18% (150,344) of the animals tested on were rabbits. With this information at hand, we can see that rabbits are commonly used in different laboratories around the world. This paper will be going over the treatment of these animals in average facilities and the impact these animals have on our society.

Seventy million of lives are claimed by animal testing facilities and millions more survive through the horrific tests, suffering the psychological and physical consequences. “The use of animals in experiments at leading federally-funded labs has increased nearly 73 percent in the past 15 years, according to a new study conducted by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).

Practices used by early Greek physician scientists, such as Aristotle and Erasistratus, are still practiced to this day. One in particular is the use of animals in experimentation. Times have changed and technology has improved since they walked this earth. In recent developments, alternative methods for animal testing have been getting more funding, attention and research done in hopes to improve the scientific community. Testing on animals comes with many risks such as missed side effects due to the differences in animal and human DNA, which leads to wasted money. It also affects animals; over half of the animals used in animal experimentation are killed simply for the experimentations sake. Issues like these

Michael Pollan’s piece, “An Animal’s Place” was also very thought provoking. After reading his article in examining Singer’s piece in-depth, I came to a conclusion. It is our right, our accountability as humans to treat animals correctly since we have more intellectual abilities than them, just like with our obligations in helping individuals that have disabilities.

Most decent people believe in fairness, equality and doing the right thing. Then there are those individuals who are corrupt and immoral? As human beings, the world would be a better place if our society made a conscious effort to conduct themselves honourably and ethically. Is killing animals morally right? Millions of living creatures that experience pain just as much as humans are suffering unnecessarily for cosmetic research. How can society allow this to happen to other living creatures? It is completely outrageous. Isn’t society supposed to serve justice and not injustice? What happens when the test subject keeps evolving? First it was mice, then rabbits, then monkeys, now deer. What are next humans? Everyone with a heart cares for

Animals. These cute, loveable, and friendly creatures have been with humans for what seems to be forever. Animals have always given and continue to give company to humans and always put a smile on people's faces. Then why do people use them for testing? Animal testing is torture to animals, the alternative such as the Organ on a chip and human skin model, are more efficient, and humans and animals react differently. Despite the fact that animal testing aids in saving humans lives, scientist that use animals as test subjects are treated inhumanely. Therefore, the government should ban animal testing.

Can animal testing be stopped? Geoff Watts believed it could be stopped. Watts questioned whether it was really necessary to continue animal testing. He knew they couldn’t just end animal testing overnight, this was something he was going to work hard to accomplish. His main goal was not only to end animal testing but to also replace it in the process. Then there's the question, with what?

: This experiment focused on testing kitchen waste products such as kale, gourd and oats to determine which is the best raw material for an anaerobic digester to produce biogas. The student tested kale, gourd and oats. Based from the experiment, only the oats produced enough gas to make the balloon