Research Paper On Animal Testing

Throughout the years the use of animals in medical research has been a hot debate around the world. Although animal testing may be cruel and inhumane, thousands of humans are saved thanks to the research that animals supply researchers with. Animals testing have taken over our knowledge of medicine and treatments to a whole different level. Animal testing also does this in a cheap and effective way. Without animals testing out knowledge wouldn’t be up to date, in other words animals’ testing is good.

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel and inhumane but also often ineffective. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. There have been past occasions where drugs passed on animals weren’t even safe. There is no excuse for animal testing in today’s techy world, there are now many alternatives for animal testing that would put an end to the pain and suffering endured by these innocent animals during human testing.

A long time of debates go back and forth on the rights of all animals with further argument or debates, do humans have the right to use animals on medical testing and lab use? There are several issues that can be placed in this argument this research will acknowledge four important topics in the rights of animal testing. Is it right to use animals for testing? Is it right to compare animal DNA to human DNA in these animal experiments? Is it right to use real animals instead of computers to generate results? Is it right to state animals are being protected and cared for while giving toxins to make them sick? Therefore, the question needs to be asked if animals should be used for scientific experiments in labs all across the globe.

Although many people believe animal testing is good and can benefit humans, conversely the use of animals is seen by many in the medical field as necessary. While it is not ideal to cause harm to animals it is a safer way to test new products compared to testing them on humans. Animal testing is cruel and hurts innocent animals each day, the results of tests are not always successful, scientists should invest their money on other things that can make their tests more accurate and usable. Using animals as research experiments fail 94% of the time when tested on humans. The tests are not reliable. According to

The world we know today would not exist without animals. Today’s medicine and amenities have made everyone’s lives significantly better, but the methods used to find some of these things are not so wonderful. Namely, testing products on animals. Product testing on animals has been used for several breakthroughs in medicine and how we live our lives, but is it at a greater cost than it is reward? Animal testing has been used for several hundred years as a way to find new developments in medicine; however, some of the means of this are terrible and animals are subjected to great pain and die in captivity.

Since many years, animals have always been one of the reasons for the survival of many human beings. They are used for experimental and medical research for finding new drugs and treatments and for the general advancement of health and medicine. There has been a controversy between people about the pros and cons to the practice of animal testing and whether it is helpful or it is just wasting the animal lives and there could be alternatives.

“Animal experimentation is the term used to explain the use of animals in education, training and research” (“Animal Experimentation” ) in order to enhance medical and cosmetological experimentation for humans, and involves keeping animals locked up in a laboratory. The sole purpose of animal experimentation and the use of animals in research dates back to when humans started looking for ways to cure and prevent deadly diseases. Today, “the majority of animal experiments do not contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal experimentation plays in most medical advances is questionable” (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. par. 1). In other words, animal experimentation is not justified in the world we

There is no surprise when we hear that for years humans have used animals in their experiments for the benefit of science, but as humans learned more about the differences and similarities between themselves and animals the experiments have become more evasive leaving the animal being tested on in a deplorable state that usually leads to permanent disability or death. In the process of advancement, new and much more reliable alternative methods of testing have been found. Using an alternative method does not just save the animals but can also save millions of lives in the process. Animals should not be used in tests for scientific research.

Animals are man’s best friend; this is what most people claim, but do they really mean it? Animal testing is widely used nowadays and this method has been used long time ago. Some people agree that animal testing is useful and has some benefits as it helps in discovering new medicines and its side effects so by this method it helps in saving humans lives and some animals too. Animal testing is so inhumane due to the physical pain and cruelty the animals face, some experiments are misleading and some are useless.

Animal testing is a necessary evil used at medical facilities to advance scientific research. In recent years the use of animals has come under some intense pressure and criticism by animal protection and animal rights groups. The use of animals to advance research has undergone intense revisions allowing for a more effective way to utilize them in research facilities. Debate about whether the use of animals in medical research is humane or not has been debated since the 17th century (Ballentine). Since its beginnings, many countries have enacted strict laws that govern the use of animals within research facilities.

Throughout the United States, animal testing has been allowed since 1922. According to Dr. Francis Collins, director of National Institutes of Health, there has been an approximate of more than 100 million animals tested on per year (Collins). Animal testing is important to scientists who create medicine because it has been proven that animals can be helpful for medical experimentations since there are many similarities between humans and animals (Collins). Within using animals as testing experiments, there are many benefits for the reason behind this; it has been proven that animal testing helps further humans’ knowledge about medicine and helps test reactions from the medicine that was created. However, behind the logical thinking of using animals as test subjects, there are also consequences for allowing this. The consequences may not impact humans directly because the animals that are being used as experiments are being taken away from their homes and removed from their families in order to suffer and soon die. National Institutes of Health states, “ ...more

“People in the U.S. slaughter 9 billion chickens and 150 million cattle, pigs and sheep annually, yet we only use around 26 million animals for research, 95% of which are rodents, birds, and fish” (U.S Statistics, 1). Over the years animal testing has become more humane with their practices. Animals themselves benefit from the testing, but most counterclaims are relying on the backing of ethical appeal. Therefore, to hamper the progression of animal testing would be to hamper medical advancements as a whole, the result of which will have reverberating effects such as a rampant influx in diseases, diseases that would eradicate cattle and deplete an invaluable source of food.

The use of animals for scientific research has been a topic of debate for a long time. On one hand it is morally wrong to use animals for human benefit. On the other hand, removing animals completely from lab for research would limit our understanding of health and disease, and will affect the development of new and vital treatments. It is true that sometimes these studies do reduce the quality of life of animals, thorough regulations should be in place to ensure that they are carried out in a less violent way.

Animal experimentation has been a controversial subject for decades. Millions of animals have been killed in United States laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experiments, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Animal experimentation has proven to be an imprecise way of research and practices in animal cruelty. There are alternatives to animal testing that have been proven more accurate, but because of tradition these alternatives are overlooked by many. The three R’s of animal testing, reduction, refinement, and replacement, should be implemented. The testing of animals does not have enough beneficial results to deem it necessary. Many drugs proven safe for animals have been proven harmful to humans in human trials. In order to make experimentation more accurate, scientists should rely on human cells and carefully conducted clinical trials with humans (as cited in Thomas, 2009, p. 95).

The use of living, breathing animals in labs for research and product testing has been a topic of great controversy for years. Over 100 million animals are killed in labs for research and experimentation purposes each year in the U.S. alone, according to PETA’s article, “Experiments on Animals: Overview”. Unfortunately, no matter how a person feels about animals, it doesn’t change the fact that millions of their innocent lives are being taken advantage of every year. There are a few different viewpoints people have about animals, as some see them as loving pets and companions, while others see them as a logical method for conducting experiments to advance research. Unfortunately, no matter how a person feels about animals, it doesn’t change the fact that millions of their innocent lives are being taken advantage of every year. Animal experimentation for scientific or commercial use is a practice that needs to be eradicated for its unnecessary and unethical treatment of animal subjects.