Animal Testing Should Be Banned Animals For Operations For The Purpose Of Experimentation Or Scientific Research? Essay

“It is a simple fact that many, if not most, of today’s modern medical miracles would not exist if experimental animals had not been available to medical scientists. It is equally a fact that, should we as a society decide the use of animal subjects is ethically unacceptable and therefore must be stopped, medical progress will slow to a snail’s pace. Such retardation will in itself have a huge ethical ‘price tag’ in terms of continued human and animal suffering from problems such as diabetes, cancer, degenerative cardiovascular diseases, and so forth.”

Animal testing has become a wide contribution in medical field in order to find new treatment, developing new medicines and improving the existing ones as well as testing the safety and effectiveness of new medicines. Some medicines development is depending on animal research, for instances, vaccines and insulin for diabetes and kidney transplants. However, there are many diseases that their cures are still undiscovered yet and one of them is AIDS (Tanir, 2012). Frankie L. Trull once said in his article of Animal Test Research Has Saved Many Human Lives, “[…] fight against cancer has seen 24 significant biomedical advances in the past 30 years. None of them could have occurred without animal research.” Therefore, this

Animal vivisection is the study, experimentation and research of any animal. Animal rights activists are opposed to using animals for medical research and experimentation because humans do not have the right to use animals. With very few exceptions, we do not experiment on humans without their consent. Animals can’t give informed consent and the vast majority of experiments using animals are so invasive and damaging, that we would never even consider allowing humans to being subject to such experiments. Every year, animals are dissected, infected, injected, gassed, burned and blinded in hidden laboratories all over the world, most of the time without anesthetic or pain killers. If they aren’t killed by the testing, the animals are often not kindly but brutally killed. The dead animals are frequently left stacked in wheelbarrows in front of the animal cages.

"Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in United States labs every year."(Do Something np) Medical testing on animals has always been a heated argument due to its equal pros and cons. Testing on animals is needed to assure the safety of cosmetics, food, medicine and other products. Testing on animals may have its benefits for humans, but it's cruel for us to torture something that feels pain like us. Many animals possess internal systems and organs that are identical to the structures and functions of human internal organs. Rats and mice exhibit many of the same responses to chemicals as humans. (Zurlo np)

I think we shouldn't test on animals. Animals are born to grow up and live a happy, healthy life not get tested on for mascara and lipstick. Animals die and get sick everyday due to animal testing. Some animals go blind, deaf, lose their legs or ears, make their young have birth defects, or worse they could die. They whine and get hurt, the scientists just continue their work, it is like they have no heart for these animals.

Facilities that use animals for teaching, experimentations, surgery or testing purposes are known as research facilities. Currently, there are twelve animal research facilities in the state of Alabama ("General Information on Animal Research"). There are many different reasons why animals are used for research. Animals are used to test the products used in cosmetics, for biomedical research, for military defense and food production. Many people including the general public, scientists and government officials do not necessarily agree to the terms and conditions to which these animals are used for testing

Did you know that the shampoo you use was probably forced down the throat of a rabbit, cat, or maybe even a dog? Each year, millions of animals are used to test how safe and effective products, such as cosmetics, are. They are genetically modified, force-fed harmful chemicals, blinded, scalded, and maimed. How could one not object to this awful cruelty? Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, unnecessary, inaccurate, and expensive.

When picking out your mascara or eyeliner do you ever stop and wonder what you are putting on your face? All kinds of chemicals go into our consumer products: How often do we stop to ask ourselves what exactly we’re using? Did you ever consider that maybe you are contributing to animal testing or worse, animal abuse?

People who oppose Vivisection argue that humans are only benefiting ourselves through harming animals, and claim animals are nothing like people and believe that there for testing on them is not helping us at all. I want you to learn that these tests are not just for humans but animals too. Animal testing has led to advancements in animals as well. Most procedures conducted on humans today are also used on animals. We can now not only extend the life of humans but also

Vivisection, even though it’s not commonly known, is the study of experimentations and research on animals.

Imagine you are locked up in a prison; suddenly mysterious people yank you out and drag you to a lab table. They pull out a needle and inject you with a mysterious liquid. Within a few minutes, you start feeling something horribly wrong, as if something inside you is squirming and thrashing, trying to take control of your body. Then, the mysterious people poke you with sterile tools and hook you up to machines that take data on the behavior of your body. They extract blood from your body and then throw you back into the cell. As the time goes on, the pain gets worse and you cry for help but none comes. They left you to die. Lab animals receive this same treatment. “More than 100 million animals… [are] killed in U.S. laboratories” (“Experiments

On a typical evening, you are in your car driving home after a long work day when the thought of the prescription you have been neglecting to pick up pops into your head. You make a sharp turn off the highway into the Walgreens parking lot. Passing through those automatic doors, your eyes land upon the never-ending shelves loaded with beauty products. Wandering through the aisles on your way to the pharmacy, mascara, eyeliner, face wash, and various other beauty products make their way into your shopping basket. At the pharmacy counter, the pharmacist hands you the prescription you came to pick up, and you begin to make your way back to the front of the store to the check out counter. After checking out, you are on your way home with all of

According to The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, published by William Russell and Rex Burch in 1959, there are 3 important principles when it comes to animal testing and research. These principles: reduction, refinement, and replacement are typically known as the “3 R’s.” Reduction is meant to minimize the number of animal used in experimental procedures, refinement aims to limit the animal’s exposure to pain, and replacement is designed to use non-animal options whenever possible. While the problem with animal testing is constantly brought to people’s attention, the number of animals used for research is still increasing to this day. It is questionable whether these principles sufficiently reflect the development in our knowledge about animals and their emotional capabilities, the interest of these animals, or the harm that corresponds. It also raises serious questions about the success rate of the predicted outcomes of animal testing.

Every year, millions of animals suffer through painful and unnecessary tests. Animals in laboratories all over the world live lives of deprivation, pain, isolation, and torture. Even though vast studies show that animal experimentation often lacks validity, leading to harmful human reactions, we still continue to use this method of experimentation, while many other less-expensive and more beneficial alternatives exist. Going beyond the issue of animal experimentation being morally wrong, this form of research is also hindering medical progress. Although the use of animals in laboratories is said to be necessary for the welfare and health of humans, people mistakenly believe that this immoral and unscientific method of experimentation is

From the moment that the research project was assigned to me, I had a pretty good idea on the topic that I wanted to write about for the semester. Animal testing is a broad and controversial topic to many people because scientist and doctors are testing products on animals. Instead of testing on animals there are other ways to test products on. To prevent animal testing, one can buy cruelty-free products, educate others, help stop cosmetic testing or make donations to organizations that are against testing on animals. For my topic, I choose to research whether animals should be used for scientific or commercial testing.