Animal Testing Should Be Banned

Protesting has been going around the world for many of years. Throughout many years of people boycotted agents a situation they believe, if a wrong or right. One of the biggest areas on where people gather around and protest is when they’re fighting agents animals testing. As well as the years has pasted on protesting on animals, it became more sires in increased in the 1960’s and 1970’s. Many cosmetics companies been testing on animals throughout the years there is also many that have not. The cosmetics line LUSH has been fighting over animals testing for over thirty years and will continue to fight for their right according to the company. When LUSH had first started the company had divided they didn 't ever wanted to test their product on animal. Not only fighting agents animals testing LUSH is also ego friendly; everything they use its plants, oil, and recycle. Since LUSH having to be agents animal testing, policies had created to work with the companies of cosmetics to end the cruelty of animals. The LUSH company say “ This can be done without animal testing …” and it true. LUSH is a company that all there product dills with ones skin to make them fell and look beautiful. If LUSH can test their products other than animals and still make your still looking good then, other cosmetics companies can do the same.

In the United States, over 100 million animals are used for experimentation and testing every year. Most of these animals will either live a lifetime of misery and neglect or face death. A copious amount of controversy surrounds animal experimentation because of the way it is performed. Animal testing is done to test products for harsh chemicals, for medical research, and educational purposes.

Within the past several decades, as medical and scientific research have progressively advanced throughout the world, the global market has expanded to encompass a wide range of medications, chemicals, cosmetics, and other commercial products. In an endeavor to account for the constantly increasing demand for these products, numerous research facilities and laboratories have arisen across the United States. However, although a number of these medications and cosmetics have proven an asset to society, these products are created at the expense of the lives of millions of innocent creatures. Before becoming available for consumption on the market, the effectiveness of these products is verified through a series of unfathomably cruel animal trials and experiments. While the government has sought to maintain a measure of control over animal experimentation through the implementation of laws, these efforts have been largely in vain. Despite the enactment of regulations designed to reduce the mistreatment of

Animal experimentation has been a controversial issue for many years. Over tens of millions of animals such as rodents, birds, apes, and rabbits are utilized in labs to test the toxicity of chemicals used in shampoos, cosmetics, vaccines, and much more. In this essay, I will talk about the types of experiments, the scientific break throughs of those tests, and lastly debate whether or not the act is morally justified.

Consumers buy products most commonly from brands that they feel provide the best quality. They are also counting on the products to be safe. For example beauty products should not be harmful to the area it is being applied on, and hair dyes should not cause other reactions other than coloring the consumer 's hair. For companies, these are big concerns on their hands to avoid bad reputation, lawsuits, etc. There are many ways these products can be cleared and called safe. What a lot of buyers do not see is that the most commonly used method to check our products is by harming the lives of various animals. Animal testing should not be a permissible testing method that is used in the clinical and cosmetic world of products and

My thesis is that animal testing should be banned from our society altogether. Animal rights advocates argue that testing is a subject that has been argued countless amount of times in medical journals, and it has shown that it is a waste of animal lives. Subsequently, processing of a single drug requires more than 50 trials and use of as many as 12,000 animals. Moreover, regardless of the ethical issues that derive from animal testing, the infliction of physical/psychological distress on animals are resource and time deterring. Furthermore, animal experimentation provides a source of limited knowledge of how certain chemicals would behave in a human body. (Humane Society International).

“Dogs do not have many advantages over people, but one of them is extremely important: euthanasia is not forbidden by law in their case; animals have the right to a merciful death.” Milan Kundera. Using animals to test the safety of the products has been a heated topic for a decade. Generally animal testing means scientific experiment or test where alive animals are forced to undergo which cause them pain, suffering, or lasting harm. Animals testing include injecting or force feeding animals with potentially harmful substances, exposing animals to radiation, surgically removing animal’s organs or tissues to deliberately cause damage, forcing animals to inhale toxic gases, subjecting animals to frightening situations to create anxiety and depression.

Animal testing is abusive, ineffective, and should be outlawed. The use of animals in life sciences has been in laboratories for over a century. The American Medical Society endorses allowing testing of all animals to create new medicine or treatments for humans. Ever since animal testing has been put into action, many people have expressed their ethical and scientific unease about the experiments. Not only does the procedure cause the creature physical pain and psychological distress, but also it wastes resources.

Every year millions of animals are burned, tortured and crippled in research that does not even result in safer products for humans. In fact, more than 90% of experimental drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animals do not work for humans and are considered unsafe. Animal testing is barbaric; the small benefit that may be gained through testing in no way rights the torture these animals are put through. Not only is the testing harmful to the animals, it is extremely expensive. Millions of dollars a year are made by companies that provide the animals, but billions are spent on research that cannot even be used. In an effort to create data, we use animal testing results and try to apply it to the genetic makeup of humans, it doesn’t work. The physiology of humans is just too different to apply the information used in animal research. Research that involves the use of animals is inhumane and cruel, it incurs costs that are wasteful because the research is unsubstantiated and does not give useful information that can be applied to human benefit. There are better alternatives to this completely ineffective testing and waste of money, we should all voice our concerns and plead with law makers to ban testing on animals.

Animal rights is the idea that all animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and that they are entitled to their most basic needs. The topic of animals rights has been discussed in occurrences of illegal hunting, domestic animal abuse, and testing on animals for any purposes. There are a vast variety of reasons for why to test on animals, whether they be cosmetic or scientific. The most argumentative topic regarding animal testing is medical testing. The community that complies with medical animal testing does so because testing on animals for medical reasons helps researchers find drugs and treatments, proves the safety of products, and it is regulated. Those who protest testing on animals argue that it is expensive,

In today’s cosmetics industry, many ordinary animals, such as dogs, cats, rabbits, and monkeys, are being subjected to animal testing on products that could potential benefit a person’s complexion. Such animals are often chosen, because their DNA is genetically very similar to humans, and thus could be used for testing. The extensive procedures to testing various merchandises could potentially harm the animals during the process, because there are multiple trials to see whether or not the product is safe to use on humans. Of these trials, many animals suffer from intensive allergic reactions that could have long-term affects on them or potentially kill them. American cosmetic industry today are harming innocent animals, specifically rabbits, through testing procedures and instead should be using human cells to make synthetic cells that could be tested on rather than on live animals.

Animal testing is conducted every day for scientific research. About twenty-five million animals participate in experiments annually. These tests occur in order to determine how chemicals or products can affect a human body. Although the use of the animals has advanced scientific research, there is a worldwide debate on the belief that the use of animals in experiments is immoral. The US government did not require animal testing until a drug, elixir sulfanilamide, was put into certain products causing people to die. Many people died from the consumption of the liquid drug, not knowing such a thing was so deadly. Afterwards US Congress passed a “Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act” in 1938. This concurrent law forces new medications and chemicals to be tested on animals before taking a risk to test them on humans. In the article “Animal Testing” the author explains that medicines and certain chemicals are required to be tested on animals before being allowed to use on humans by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Marc R Fellenz states in 1966 the United States invented legal control over animal experimentation using the Animal Welfare Act. This regulates animal tests by requiring research laboratories to establish animal care and committees to monitor the treatment of these experimental subjects. Knowledge from such experiments provide a foundation for education in human anatomy and physiology. Occasionally, scientists will experiment on animals with

Animal experimentation is a thing of the past as there are numerous alternatives to animal testing. Many scientists have developed new methods to test the toxicity of a chemical. Sticking to the unethical and inaccurate method of animal testing is illogical. In-vitro testing, also called test-tube testing, computerised modelling and stem-cell experimentation are three

Animal testing in the scientific and cosmetic fields has been a controversial topic throughout the world for many years. This topic keeps coming back up only to be pushed aside or covered back up by officials. Many people stay outraged and concerned when it comes to animal testing and the fact that it has gone on for so long. The fact of the matter is, that for years now scientist have been studying and developing numerous different methods that can be used for these type of testing’s and completely exclude animals from it all. The next step now is to apply these methods and keep moving forward and progressing with these methods.

Nearly every disease known to humans has been researched at some point in time using animals (Lee). As a matter of fact 100 million animals are used in chemical, food, cosmetic, and medical testing every year (Mendoza). Testing on animals can be cruel and inhumane. Many of the test done to animals have already been performed. Despite animal testing alternatives many researchers still use animals in research today. Animals should not be used in research.