Animal Testing Should Continue

Animal testing has contributed to making many vaccines, and saving thousands of lives. Experiments in which dogs had their pancreases removed led directly to the discovery of insulin, critical to saving the lives of diabetics. The polio vaccine, tested on animals, reduced the global occurrence of the disease from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 223 cases in 2012. (ProCon.org, 2013) Also Animal testing has contributed to major advances for treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many other diseases. Also there are no known alternatives for testing on animals because animals are 99% genetically the same as humans. (OpposingViewpoints.com, 2013) Another example of how Animal Testing has helped humans tremendously is that animals had helped create the inhaler, which kills around 2,000 people each year in the UK. (understandinganimalresearch.org.uk, 2013) Lastly, one other reason that Animal Testing is needed, sharks rarely get cancer, cockroaches can regenerate damaged nerves, and some amphibians can regrow lost limbs. By studying these animals people may learn how their body does all of this and apply it to human medicine. (amprogress.org, 2013) Animal Testing has saved many lives, and if it is not banned it will continue to save

There are so many reasons to stop animal testing. These are examples are done to animals in laboratories but if they are done outside of these test labs, they would be considered a crime and animal abuse. Animals suffer during these tests and in these dark and cold cages with no protection from the cruel experiments that they do to them. Some scientists have come up with alternatives that are more modern and doesn’t use animal, but most scientists are wasting this opportunity and still harming animals for

In conclusion, some may say that it is unethical or inhumane to test animals who have no say-so in what is happening to them but if we tested humans and purposely expose them to health risks in order to research a disease, which is what would have to happen if we stopped testing on animals, then that would be just as bad. Animal testing for medical treatments is reasonable because it is the most accurate way to get results, without putting humans at unnecessary health risks, and it is easier to control their environment while monitoring animals because of their shorter life spans. Animal testing has also saved millions of

Some people argue that animal testing is necessary for scientific advancements to find cures and treatments. This is true, vaccines for polio and hepatitis B were used on animals and were successful. Thalidomide was also used on pregnant animals and it was found to cause birth defects. This is an understandable concern, however animals had to suffer for these advancements and it’s inhumane. According to the U.S Department of Agriculture, in 2010 97,123 animals

Experimentation of animals may be horrible. But if they do continue the experimentation of animals than that would have evermore excellent results. First, It means that they do not have to test the experiments on themselves. Second, it goes against the laws of science to test it on humans first. And third, It is easier to test and observe the reaction of a mouse or smaller creature than it is to see on a human. And so for these reasons they should continue the experimentation of animals before humans.

To begin with, animal testing should not be allowed due to many species that are becoming endangered because of all the animal testing. For example, animal testing will eventually become a cycle of species extinction causing for a specific species to become very rare (customessaymeister.com). Furthermore, a rate of 100 to 1,000 species were lost a million per year. 100 million or more animals each year are brutally killed in American laboratories alone for educational purposes cosmetic testing, food products, and medical purposes (peta.org). In Addition, this means that its due to human-caused habitat and because the change of climate. Scientists who animal test do not realize that the animals feel fear

Each year, “more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing.” There are all types of animals that are used to do these experiments. Animal testing is inhumane and cruel, and causes pain to living creatures. Also, the reaction of drug in an animal 's body can be very different from a human 's body. An important thing about animal testing is that it can be very costly and unnecessary. Testing on animals should not be permitted because it is causing unnecessary harm to a living animal.

Dr Conn a scientist at the Oregon University said that “polio, smallpox, and tuberculosis are but some of the ailments that have largely disappeared thanks to animal research.” Quoted by Dr Conn, 2009 (biotechpharmaceuticals.suite101.com/article.cfm/is_animal_testing_in_scientific_research_needed)

Approximately twenty-six million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and consumer research. These animals are used to test products that many people use everyday. The animals are used to test toxicity, consumer products, medical devices, and new drugs. The Federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) regulates animal testing in the United States. The AWA defines an “animal” as any live or dead dog, cat, monkey, guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, and other warm-blooded animals. The AWA does not protect 95% of these animals. The Act excludes animals such as, birds, rats, mice, reptiles, and most fish. While the AWA regulates the housing and transportation of animals used for research, it does not regulate the experiments themselves. Even though the AWA regulates the housing, the facilities are most often horrific. A new and upcoming alternative methods are being put in to place so fewer animals can be used in experimentations. Animal testing should be stopped because new alternative methods are being developed, the testing facilities are unsuitable, it is costly, not time efficient, and the researchers are not following the laws set in place by the United States government (Robinson, 1).

First,Testing on animals is unacceptable and horrible. In fact, We are killing animals be many ways. Mostly by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or even worse. Animals are just tested for only human matters.Doctors try to help people with diseases but some of the medicine may be deadly to humans so we keep ourselves safe we will put animals safety for ours.Yes animal testing has found many cures but so many are being killed. Now, most animals don't have the same dna like humans so what is the point.

Many controversies are going on in the world on a variety of topics, and one that many dispute on is whether animal testing should be used for specific purposes or for all purposes. Animals take a large part on Earth, since they help the world and the human race with its desire of advancement. Commercial purposes of animal testing uses its subjects to find the safety level of certain products for humans. Scientific purposes of animal testing uses its animals for improvements in medicine and treatments for humans, and research for animals. Many concern over the wellness of the animals as well, which is why they argue on some cases involving the testing. Animal testing should only be in use for scientific purposes, because it improves animal

Animal testing soon started to become a necessity after many scientists started to test with them. Everyone seemed to be glad that there was a new and improved way to test for disease. In the late 1800s, many people began to speak out. Great Britain also passed out the Animal cruelty act. Animal testing has begun to evolve as time passed by, but has become more of a tradition instead of a reliable source for testing. In the 1950s, scientists began to test for anesthetics. 1965 was when the polio vaccine came out. Dolly the sheep was a clone, the first ever animal clone. She was created in 1996, and died a few years later. Animal testing has come a long way and is full of history, but that doesn’t mean we need to continue

Animal testing should be a thing of the past. Imagine this, scientists injecting a certain chemical to an innocent animal to test, so that product can be safe for human utilization. Now, this chemical will have a mercurial effect on that animal, it will either comply with it or succumb to the chemical and causing various side effects; could even lead to death. This is the sad and cruel reality animals in labs are facing. Over the years, scientists from all over the globe have conducted tedious experiments on animals for the sole purpose of the human beings’ safety. There is no question about whether or not human lives matter, they do. That’s why scientists resulted in testing on animals. It would be unethical to practice on a human being, but shouldn’t they say the same thing for an animal? This issue is imperative because animal testing is very cruel, inhumane, and unethical. Millions of animals’ lives had come to a short because of failed experiments. Scientists should resort to alternative testing methods, rather than testing on animals. Though successful research with animal testing seem beneficial to human beings, the pain and suffering, and even death, unfortunately, is not worth it.

Because of animal testing, we have multiple life-saving cures and vaccines such as a vaccine for Hepatitis B (ProCon.org, 2016). Another sound reason for animal testing is that animals are similar to us; in fact, chimps and mice have a close DNA match to humans (ProCon.org, 2016). Not to mention, animals are a more suitable alternative than human test subjects when the tests could put a human in danger (ProCon.org, 2016). It is preferred to harm the animals than the humans. Another positive aspect of animal testing is that the animals could benefit from the test themselves; as an example, chlamydia vaccines have slowed down koala extinction (ProCon.org, 2016). Moreover, the alternative to animal testing is computer models and cells, but that does not compare to living models because single cells do not show the effect on the body and computers can be accurate if only information from the subject is entered (ProCon.org, 2016). When doing animal testing, it is highly regulated and abide by the standards of AWA (ProCon.org, 2016). In addition, animal testing must occur humanely for the animal’s sake and to ensure reliable results (ProCon.org, 2016). Which is why there are various reasons animal testing is

The practice of animal testing should continue to be used due to the remarkable success of medical treatments among humans, medical discoveries (look up progression), and psychological examinations.