Animal Testing Should Not Be Banned

When picking out your mascara, do you stop to see what kind of makeup you are using? You could be supporting animal cruelty and not even know it. Today many makeup products are being tested on animals such as Covergirl, Revlon and even MAC. We have made numerous advancements in the world and have established the scientific evolution but it seems that our ethics and morals have failed to progress. The knowledge and power we have is exceptional, but with it comes responsibility to use it wisely and ethically. We kill and torture creatures that we arrogantly consider lesser beings. For something as simple as mascara animals are tortured and blinded by tests performed at the laboratory. It is estimated that each year over 100 million animals are being performed on for different types of experiments all around the world. Most of the things being performed in these labs you could never imagine one human being doing to another. I believe that animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, not very reliable, inaccurate, and is proved to be unnecessary.

Protesting has been going around the world for many of years. Throughout many years of people boycotted agents a situation they believe, if a wrong or right. One of the biggest areas on where people gather around and protest is when they’re fighting agents animals testing. As well as the years has pasted on protesting on animals, it became more sires in increased in the 1960’s and 1970’s. Many cosmetics companies been testing on animals throughout the years there is also many that have not. The cosmetics line LUSH has been fighting over animals testing for over thirty years and will continue to fight for their right according to the company. When LUSH had first started the company had divided they didn 't ever wanted to test their product on animal. Not only fighting agents animals testing LUSH is also ego friendly; everything they use its plants, oil, and recycle. Since LUSH having to be agents animal testing, policies had created to work with the companies of cosmetics to end the cruelty of animals. The LUSH company say “ This can be done without animal testing …” and it true. LUSH is a company that all there product dills with ones skin to make them fell and look beautiful. If LUSH can test their products other than animals and still make your still looking good then, other cosmetics companies can do the same.

For many years, the field of science has used animals in medical experiments worldwide, because of this innocent animals are being killed everyday. They are being tested with new drugs, new treatments, and by many makeup companies. Connecticut recently celebrated the passage of the “Beagle Freedom Law”, a law that requires laboratories to work with charities and rescue groups to find homes for research cats and dogs. Animals are being tested so humans do not have to be but animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings, although animals are the closest thing to humans. Most experiments involving animals are flawed, wasting the lives of innocent animal subjects. Over 100 million animals suffer a year from testing. Testing animals is a lot more expensive than alternative methods and it is wasting government research dollars. Animal testing is not only a bad idea, but it is also inhuman and it should not be tolerated. The FDA should stop allowing animal testing. An animal does not give out the same results on a test than a human would.

due to cruel chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests as well as in medical training exercises and curiosity-driven medical experiments at universities. Even though modern non-animal tests have been repeatedly shown to have more educational value, save teachers time, and save schools money, animals still suffer and die in classroom biology experiments and dissection. Examples of these horrid tests include forcing mice and rats to inhale toxic fumes, force-feeding dogs pesticides, and dripping corrosive chemicals into rabbits’ sensitive eyes. Even if a product harms animals, it can still be marketed to consumers. Contrarily, just because a product was shown to be safe in animals does not guarantee that it will be safe to use in humans. An exact number isn’t available because mice, rats, birds, and cold-blooded animals, who make up more than 99 percent of animals used in experiments, are not covered by even the minimal protections of the Animal Welfare Act and therefore go uncounted.

Topic: The harmful testing of products on animals. Specific Purpose: I aim to persuade my audience to stop supporting companies that bring harm to animals by testing new products on them. Thesis Statement: Experimenting with new products on animals is cruel, and it will continue unless we do something about it. Introduction: I. Gaining and maintaining favorable attention: Have you ever thought about how many of the products you buy are tested on animals. Have you ever thought about the pain these animals go through just to see if a new product is safe or not.

Animal testing has become a controversial issue among many people in the world today. Some of these people involved in this controversial debate believe that animal testing is unethical and should be replaced by other methods. The other group of people in this debate believe that animal testing is necessary in order to research new products that cannot be tested on humans. Traditional animal testing forces animals to undergo numerous experiments for different forms of research. Medical, cosmetic, and many other types of research experiments use animals to provide the results on how the new product may affect humans. There are many people that support the use of alternative methods to animal research and then

In the United States over 100 million animals are use for animal testing they treat them in a cruel way. However, these creatures suffer many damages and the problem is that they cannot defend themselves and if we still consuming products that includes animal testing this plague is never going to end. Some of the main reasons why we should stop buying products that they use animals for testing are because of the physical pain they cause to the animal, animals’ rights are violated when they use them for research and, the mental damage you cause to the animal if they survive.

Many people are unaware that several brands they use on the daily practice animal testing to help develop their products. Although it may not be every brand on the shelf, there is a good handful of them that would surprise you. Products such as beauty cosmetics, household cleaners, personal cleanliness products, and food additives use tests. For example, the company Johnson and Johnson claims that they care for the world and the people. What they don’t quite understand is that mistreating animals is

In these tests a wide range of chemicals and products including drugs to cosmetics are used. These tests cause issues that debate the ethics and humaneness of intentionally harming the animals to sell any new product. After testing, some animals are killed for no more reason than to clear space, while other animals are injured and live the remainder of their lives in captivity. An opinion poll was taken by HSUS in 2001 that asked the general population about their feelings on pain and harm done to animals during research. The results showed 62% would approve testing if animals experienced little or no pain while 75% disapprove when severe pain is experienced. The intention of animal experiments is not to harm the animals, but that is what it does. Evidence that shows that animals cannot be relied on for information and research. There are also cases where products and drugs will never be approved by the FDA and sold to the public. This is expressed significantly by those against animal testing because of the simple fact that the animal died with no contribution to people. Another negative to this field are the high costs just to maintain the animals and keep them alive on top of the money used to conducts the tests. The issue with the testing and the cost is the tests can occur more than once over the course of a month and cost money every single time. It is

Did you know that over one hundred million animals die a year from animal testing? And that’s just in the U.S.! Animal testing has helped us, but it causes much more harm than good. Testing should have a lot more restrictions, so animals used in experiments experience less pain. Almost all of the animals tested on end up dying, and until then, they are treated cruelly, enduring many experiments. They can all feel things, and they are constantly mentally and physically suffering. All sorts of animals are used in experiments: monkeys, rabbits, cats, dogs, hamsters, guinea pigs, and birds. They have little to no protection, and even protected animals are not safe. Many big brands test their products on animals, such as Lysol, Chapstick, Febreze,

Everyone has seen or heard “against animal testing,” “animal cruelty free,” “no animals were harmed in the making of this.”Many companies put these disclaimers on their labels, but in reality these companies still use animals to test products. Animal testing is a very controversial issue in many communities. It is believed that animal testing is used as a safer and money- saving way to test products and medicines. Although animal testing has shown that many products and medicines are harmless to people and has cured diseases, there are other ways that exist to test these products.

The public doesn’t know what processes go through a product before it finally reaches them. Products like contact lenses, detergents, toothpaste, cosmetics and so forth are being tested on animals to ensure safety their safety. Animal research has been an important issue which is debated even today. Many people feel that the usage of animals for research is cruel and morally wrong. It is argued that animals are tortured and they go through so much of suffering just for our benefit. However, If we eliminate testing, then it would be a really big change in our lives which could lead to more problems and difficulties rather than actually solving the problem. Animal experiments should continue to proceed as it has consistently brought accomplishment

When picking up makeup or shampoo at a drug store, does one ever stop to think if an animal tested product is being bought or not? Innumerable people fail to consider how these products came to be or if there was animal experimentation was involved. Many people are oblivious to the appalling occurrences that take place in laboratories involving animal cruelty on a daily basis. Government officials and scientists believe that testing on animals is essential for medical research, but many of the results prove to be irrelevant and the reality is that most animals that are experimented on go through excruciating torture that frequently leads to death. Even though the methods of testing have greatly changed over the course of many years, this topic is widely debated between animal right’s activists, scientists and the government, as well as the public. It is inhumane to burn, electrocute, torture with drugs, poison with chemicals, or even kill an animal for the sake of a human’s well being. Although animal experimentation is a traditional method to develop more medical advancements with less human-based experiments, it is an expensive way of testing products and often the results show inaccurate outputs, and at the same time, it is cruel to the animals.

The creation of a new product, should not cause animals to suffer and die. Because humans want a new lip color or a new type of eyeliner, does not mean that numerous animals should be immensely tortured and at times to death. Many argue that in order to ensure the safety of a product, animal testing is necessary. However, in today’s scientific world, this is not true. Many people argue that animal testing is cheaper, but according to Consumers ' Research Magazine writer Beatrice Hunter, it costs 500,000 dollars per product to test something using animals, as opposed to alternatives, which cost on average 50 dollars per product.

Animal testing, although a controversial topic, affects a great deal of scientists and the work force in the agriculture field. This topic has proven difficult to communicate to one another about because there are individuals that believe animals should have certain rights and others believe that animals have no rights. Our group wanted to research this topic because we want to gain knowledge and become more understanding toward the people on both sides of the spectrum. Digging more into the research we found that cosmetics, medical use, and food are the most widely used methods for experimentation. With these research fields, people are finding ways to appeal to the ethics of the modern-day consumer.