Animal Testing and Mistreatment of Animals Essay

President and science spokeswoman of the Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR), Frankie Trull, resolutely stated in an interview that, “An immediate end to animal research in the U.S. would be a death sentence for millions of people around the world.” Trull supported her admission by adding, “If you’ve ever taken antibiotics, had a vaccine, had chemotherapy, an MRI, a blood transfusion, dialysis, an organ transplant, bypass surgery, or joint replacement, you have been the beneficiary of research that started with lab animals.” (The Price). To disregard these major accomplishments would be foolishly ignorant, seeing as Trull established, millions of people would not be alive without these advancements. Hundreds of millions more lives have been touched in some way by these medical breakthroughs, whether directly or secondarily. Yet the miracles discovered in the past do not define what we do in the future. The fact that animals have been considerably prominent contributors to research does not mean that this is the only route that can be taken. As previously stated, there are several alternative methods of medical research in the process of being further developed that have already proven to be suitable replacements for animal testing and experimentation. These methods’ results have even shown to be more accurate and possibly more effective than those of animal testing. The continuation of animal testing and experimentation cannot be justified by past successes. Every problem can be solved with more than one

As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.

Around the world, millions of scientists conduct their studies by testing their research on animals. Many people believe that experimenting on animals is crucial to the advancement of medical discoveries. Studies show however, that animal experimentation is brutal and unnecessary. There are alternatives though: “replacement, reduction, and refinement” (Howard 2).

To begin, experimenting on animals is good because it helps to create medicines and different health products that are safe for humans. It is crucial to human health. It saves millions of human lives each year. It helps scientists to develop various drugs, vaccines, and antibiotics. Professor Sir George Radda explained in the article “Animal Research: A Necessary Measure” that “Animal research is essential to tackling major twenty first century health problems such as cancer and heart disease. Without the use of animals it would be impossible, in many cases, to develop drugs or any sort of medical treatment” (Radda). Testing on animals is something that is needed to be done to create many different health and medical products. As the quote explains, it has helped experts a lot with tackling the problem of cancer and heart disease. In addition, animals closely resemble humans, which helps scientists to create different medical treatments, and ensure that they are safe for human use. That also helps doctors in the surgical field, to make sure they do not mess up. As Rebecca Weitz explained in the article “Animal Research: A Necessary Measure,” that “Surgical protocol for modern day kidney surgery was only made possible by first experimenting and perfecting it on dogs. Potential cures for cancer that are currently underway would not be possible without the availability of animal experimentation” (Weitz). This quote shows that without the use of animals, various medical treatments would be very difficult, and maybe even impossible. Animal experimentation provides a safe zone, and not having it for things could be potentially deadly. It also makes doctors able to perfect things like surgery without harming humans. Overall, animals play a huge role in making sure

Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures, treatments, and major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, childhood leukemia, brain injuries, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many others, and was instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics. Using animals as research subjects is appropriate because they are similar to human beings in many ways.

Is animal testing a cruelty an experiment in cruelty. There are many good things that come from animal testing, but there are also a lot of bad things. From animal testing, researchers find medicines that help many people. Also, researchers see if drugs are safe to use on humans, and if they work. However, many animals are killed and kept in captivity and will never be free. Also, animals and humans are not the same, so some drugs that work on animals may be harmful for humans. Animal testing is cruel because it is bad on animals, it is expensive, and many animals are killed or are never the same.

Throughout the years the use of animals in medical research has been a hot debate around the world. Although animal testing may be cruel and inhumane, thousands of humans are saved thanks to the research that animals supply researchers with. Animals testing have taken over our knowledge of medicine and treatments to a whole different level. Animal testing also does this in a cheap and effective way. Without animals testing out knowledge wouldn’t be up to date, in other words animals’ testing is good.

Scientists have been using animals to test medical treatments that could be used on humans, if it does well with the animal. Testing on an animal could help find a new discovery, but it could also put the animal in danger. Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year. A 2013 study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) found that nearly 150 clinical trials of treatments to reduce inflammation in critically ill patients have been undertaken, and all of them failed, despite being successful in animal tests. Animals should not be used to test medical procedures and treatments that would be later on used for humans.

The medical industry had been achieving more in the stage of medical advancements, though they are still in the early phase. Artificial organs have been one of those achievements. Although they have achieved such, artificial organs are not perfect. Most doctors as well as patients would prefer to replace a dying organ with a compatible human organ, rather than with an artificial or animal organ. Yet due to a there being less organs donated than recipients, artificial and animal organs are becoming more common in transplants. Most of this issue is because people are unaware of how organ donation works, the organs that can be donated, how many people are in need, and the advancements that have happened in the field. Organ donation saves hundreds of lives every year, but many lives are recklessly lost due to a shortage of organ donors.

The use of animals in lab work is a controversial practice that is met with strong opposition from various animal welfare groups and just people in general. The argument of whether it is ethical or morally right to continue this practice has been going on for a long time and it seems we are now at a place where alternatives to animal testing are available. Scientists have been able to reconstruct testing methods that don’t revolve around the use of animals. Such alternatives that are currently being looked into, or have already begun being implemented, include in vitro cell cultures, organoids, organs-on-chips, human-on-a-chip, noninvasive imaging, and microdosing. These methods would all allow for the reduction of animal use in laboratories or the flat out replacement of them. In vitro cell culture is the utilization of animal or plant cells for the purpose of culturing them in an artificial environment. This artificial environment would provide many of the necessary components for normal cell function such as nutrients and growth factors. Another benefit to this innovation is the ease of manipulation, molecularly, and the cost and time benefit it would have over animal models of similar nature. This new innovation would allow for studies in pharmaceutical screenings and development as well as the production of various biological compounds such as therapeutic proteins. This method is

Animals that are put forward to medical experimentation contribute to cures and treatments that have saved many lives. The California Biomedical Research Association states that “nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals.” (California Biomedical Research Association). Animals that are used for these tests have contributed incredible discoveries on unimaginable areas starting on Cancer, HIV/AIDS, Heart Disease/Stroke, Diabetes, Birth Defects, and Spinal Cord Injuries. Animal testing has made medical discoveries to go from antibiotics to blood transfusions, from

Every day, thousands of animals in laboratory cages undergo painful experiments. After three dogs were forced to ingest an experimental drug every day for five days, they experienced difficulties breathing and a high heart rate. One dog died and the other two were put to death one day later. Animal testing is beneficial for scientific growth but is very cruel and inefficient. Laboratories that have grown human organs and are testing them are getting better and more accurate results than a laboratory that runs tests on animals. ( humanesociety.org )

Animal testing for human safety is inhumane and must be banned. Beloved house pets such as rodents, rabbits and even dogs are being tested on all over the world. These powerless and voiceless animals are intentionally given dreadful diseases to find cures while scientists could be finding alternative ways of testing instead of using our furry friends. Furthermore, the tests are not precise because there have been products found to cause cancer in animals but also cures human ailments. Why are humans authorised to conduct such inhumane things, who gave humans the power of heartlessly torturing feeble animals?

Animals are used by scientists to develop research for new medications and experiments daily. The Humane Society is working to decrease the use of animals in laboratories by promoting the advancement of affective alternative approaches. Animal testing provides a useful model for treatments of diseases and possible cures. According to the US-based foundation of Biomedical Research, animal testing has made a major advance within the last century- for veterinary health and humans. The practice of using animals for testing has been debated for many decades. Is it morally right or wrong to use animals during experiments? Does federal law ensure that animals used in research are treated humanely? When considering the benefits of animal testing,

There are countless diseases and conditions that were once prevalent in society but thanks to modern medicine many are now either eradicated or minimized to reasonable living with. A multitude of these leaps and bounds in the bio-medical field are actually made possible from animal experimentation. Smallpox, polio, anthrax, and tetanus are just a few of the many examples of conditions that society has been able to mitigate due to the research that was done with animals. Although these experiments on animals have been given a handful of negative rapport from many and have created an ethical dilemma, they are absolutely necessary for modern medical advancements, safety, and economics.