Why should animals not have the same rights that humans do? Maybe because they cannot talk, read books, or drive cars, but neither can some humans for that matter. So why is it that when an experiment, which was conducted to help treat type 2 diabetes, killed 203 people, it was halted immediately, although millions of animals die each year due to scientific experimentation? The answer is that many believe that animals are worthless or are not worth as much as human beings are, so they are therefore dispensable. The problem with that is animals are living things just like humans. Therefore, like human beings, they understand fear and experience pain. They also feel excitement and happiness. So why should they be denied the same basic rights …show more content…
The first issue is that this procedure has proved to be one-hundred percent ineffective. Studies show that there have been a reported fifty-five organ transplants coming from the non-human species. All of which have resulted to torment and fatality to patients and donor animals. This is just unproven and dangerous. The second issue is that it is extremely expensive. It has proven to be hazardous and cost more that human-to-human transplants (In 1995 it cost $250,000 per operation). Why should someone even spend so much money on a guaranteed failure? The last but very serious is that xenotransplantation has the chance of ablating animal viruses to “jump the species barrier” and ultimately kill humans. A similian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) that has been suspected to of been passed from animals to humans is HIV. The virus’s origin was in Central Africa, but couldn’t be contained and spread across the world. If these kinds of procedures continue the world may see an irreversible epidemic. If HIV/AIDS has had the power to kill of millions of people imagine what could happen if there was another virus like it. To try to minimize the error of accuracy mentioned in the previous paragraph some scientist resort to using species that have closer DNA to humans. A prime example is primates. An ape’s DNA and a human’s DNA only have a 1.6% difference. This should be the complete reason why primates should not be tested. We would not test on our cousins,
This is an annotated bibliography of animal testing and if it’s morally justified. There are many opinions on the results and the entire process that it takes to test a cosmetic product or a medicine on an animal. There are many alternatives and benefits to animal testing but is it really justified? Or are animals in potential danger.
Nancy Day talks about the two unique perspectives of the generally discussed subject of creature testing and altogether discusses the results of creature testing and experimentation and furthermore the advantages we pick up and expand upon. Staying nonpartisan, she gives the pursuer a decent opportunity to see where both sides are originating from additionally giving many motivations to reject the other so that no inclination is affecting the pursuer’s sentiment. Implied for any one, mindful of this level headed discussion or not, she clears the reality this issue has been overstated and is undoubtedly influencing our day by day lives regular. This book has a fundamental motivation behind giving the pursuer some data about what is going on with the goal that they can choose for themselves which side in this warmed debate to take. This two sided pugnacious source gives an alternate bend and draws in the pursuer to an unceasing fight while alternate sources are exceptionally uneven and straightforwardly tending to the solid contradiction toward creature testing. Before perusing this book I would quickly blame the creature experimenters for such superfluous savagery and abuse yet after some exhaustive exploring, I found that there are a few advantages for creature
Around the world, millions of scientists conduct their studies by testing their research on animals. Many people believe that experimenting on animals is crucial to the advancement of medical discoveries. Studies show however, that animal experimentation is brutal and unnecessary. There are alternatives though: “replacement, reduction, and refinement” (Howard 2).
understand benefits of animal use and know that whether a person wants it or not animal
There are so many products being tested on animals , from being lipsticks, shampoos, makeup, skin care etc. But have you ever wondered the side effects these animals experience while using these products? They will experience Burning, torturing, pain, hunger, thirst etc. How is living in a cage living? It's not it is just surviving.
Imagine being poked and prodded with a needle, all to test for a new drug against
This website covers the many conditions that are forced upon animals as they’re awaiting their turn to be cruelly tested on. Not only do the animals have to wait in misery but the state in which they are kept is unlivable. It lists the many ways animals are tested upon and unfairly dragged into this life of pain. This source, siding with the animal rights, also gives many effective alternatives. Many of the organizations listed on the website promote the use of animals in testing and many fund schools for dissections in science.
Aziz, T., & Stein, J. (2011). Animal testing: TV or not TV? Two views on whether scientists
The usage of animals for developing new cosmetics and educational purposes has been going on for years. Most importantly, over 26 million animals each year are used for medical purposes: biomedical research and clinical research. Why is animal testing such an important factor in the medical field?
Whether animal testing is considered to be useful or unnecessary in the development of medicine is an ongoing discussion. Animal testing is the issue Andrew Rowan and Jack Botting with Adrian Morrison discuss in both their articles. “Avoiding Animal Testing” was written in 2011 by Andrew Rowan and was published in The Scientist. Jack Botting along with Adrian Morrison are the authors of “Animals are Vital to Medicine,” which was published in the Scientific American. All three authors clearly state their position on this issue from the beginning of their articles, starting with each of their titles. In “Avoiding Animal
Tessa Connors- Animal Testing Speech Bibliography http://www.peta.org/ISSUES/ANIMALS-USED-FOR-EXPERIMENTATION/ANIMAL-TESTING-101/ ANNOTATION; This website helped me to understand the true reality of animal testing. How serious it is, and the statistics of how many animals are effected. I felt that this website was useful by the way it effectively describes the types of testing that occur. It helped me to develop ideas on solutions and what the public can do to end animal testing.
According to 11 Facts About Animal Testing, “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year.” That is a huge amount, and 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human trials. So is this all really necessary? Technically we don't have to test on animals there are other options but they are not required. Its sad to think of these horrible things happening to these animals, but us as humans try focus on these problems. I found a piece of text from the site, 11 Facts About Animal Testing, it states, “Registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of as many as 12,000 animals.” That one pesticide requires 12,000 animals, that is a lot for 50 experiments, that is more
Many of us are unaware of the sheer number of animals that undergo constant suffering in the name of human vanity. Animal testing was originally introduced in the early 20th century and is still prominent today. It is morally unacceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes. The procedures used in animal testing are cruel and inhumane, nor are they the most reliable source of data; resulting in many mishaps. Moreover, with the perpetual advancements in technology, there are several alternative methods making animal testing unnecessary. If testing cosmetics and drugs on humans is unacceptable, what makes it acceptable to test on animals?
Spending the government's money on animal research is a good idea because then they pay for it and
Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.