Animal Welfare Vs Animal Testing Essay

Some groups that are on the supporting side of animal testing are Understanding Animal Research and Speaking of Research. In Understanding Animal Research, there are people like Wendy Jerrett, the Chief Executive, who has been working in health communications for almost 30 years. One of their main arguments is that “ while non-animal methods play an important part of biomedical research, they cannot replace all use of animals.” This statement does make sense, however, through research I have not found anything that cannot be altered to replace animal testing. Despite this, Speaking of Research brings up a good argument that can support the former one. People in Speaking of Research include Christine Archer, who is a registered veterinary technician. One of their arguments is that “ The success of many animal rights groups’ campaigns depend heavily upon the poor public understanding of animal research, uncountered misrepresentations of scientists and their work, and exploitation of the misconceptions and negative perceptions that many people have of the use of animals in the biomedical and behavioral sciences.” So, by their way of thinking, all the negative opinions about animal experimentation are only because of misunderstandings and the uneducated public.

Many people believe that animal testing is a necessary thing that has to happen to help the human race. Others think that it doesn't cause much harm and turn a blind eye. That is not true testing on animals is harmful to the economy, to humans and to the animals involved.

According to The California Biomedical Research Association, “nearly every medical breakthrough in the past century has resulted directly from research using animals.” In addition, The World Health Organisation conducted a worldwide vaccination program which drastically reduced polio from “350,000 cases in 1988 to 223 cases in 2012.” And finally, if thalidomide had been tested on animals before the 1957 outbreak in Germany, thousands of infants would have been saved of having phocomelia. In the end, animal testing can and is viewed to be a good thing by many people out

There’s no question that we have advanced dramatically when it comes to medicine, for example, in the last ½ of a century alone we’ve managed to cure, and even prevent certain cancers, we’ve created vaccines, so diseases like mumps or polio are unheard of and shocking. But how much of this can be accredited to animal tests? A lot less than you would think. Most drugs that were found successful in animal tests were found dangerous, or even fatal in humans. There are plenty of other more humane and accurate ways to accomplish what scientists are looking for in animal tests, but they still conduct these sickening experiments. This is why animal testing is inhumane, cruel, and useless.

Not only animals, but human lives too (Animal testing is bad Science). “ Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise of curing illnesses.” Says Noah Berlatsky. Even if you tested something on an animal multiple times, someone is going to have to be the first human to have to test the product on themselves. Even when humans could benefit from on a product being tested, they're still really bad for animals. For example, aspirin; it is a benefit to humans, but did you know that it kills cats while it also causes birth defects in dogs, guinea pigs, and other animals too (Berlatsky). Animals are living things and don't deserve to be treated this way. They shouldn't have to be forced to suffer in cages with disease and injury. Animals are treated as objects that have little meaning to them and little value with their lives besides the cost to purchase them (Hunnicutt). More than $2 billion was wasted because the drugs that passed the animal, failed the human test. Not only do people get sick from the product they tested on animals, but about 95% of schools use animal testing to train their kids which is wasting more animal

One of the most positive things about animal testing is that “animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments” (Animal Testing). “Testing on animals can be attributed with almost every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years” (Andrews). Many new medicines that are made need to be tested to make sure that they are going to treat diseases and cure them or stop them from growing. New medicines are not always going to work the first time around, so experimenting on animals helps scientists know how medicines will react on the human body. “Experiments in which dogs had their pancreases removed led directly to the discovery of insulin, critical to saving the lives of diabetics” (Animal Testing). And according to that, without

Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. The removal of pancreas from a dog led to the direct discovery of insulin. “The California Biomedical Research Association states every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals,” Chris Abee, Director of the University of Texas says. Smallpox has been eradicated from our planet due to cows. Millions of humans lives are saved every year because of animal testing. Do you want for millions of humans to die just because you like animals more than humans?

“ Animal research and testing has played a part in almost every medical breakthrough of the last century. It has saved hundreds of millions of lives worldwide” Joan Ryan, a former UK home office minister, claims that without animal testing, diseases wouldn’t be cured, or there wouldn’t be any treatments for the disease. Without animal testing certain medicines, cures, and biomedical engineering wouldn’t exist or be as proficient. An estimated 26 million animals have been used to test medical vaccines for diseases. Scientists also use animals to test the toxicity of the vaccines. Animal testing may come off as a rather harsh and inhumane form of study when heard about , but without it, global diseases would be spreading faster and possibly everyone will be infected. Nearly every Nobel Prize winner in Physiology or Medicine since 1901 relied on the information based off of animal research. Since animal testing has been used for research purposes many diseases have been cured and are no longer existent and if not cured then the disease is close to being cured.

Animal testing should continue as the impact of diseases have been reduced or in some cases cured. An example of this is the disease Polio which causes paralysis and affected many in the 1900s. A polio vaccine was experimented on animals and later used on humans saving many lives. Flu vaccinations, antibiotics, vaccines and many other pharmaceuticals-all used on humans have been through animal testing to deem them safe. (www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=19866)

First, animal testing is very harmful to animals. 100 million animals are harmed or killed because of testing. For example, the poor animals are given painful tests until they are not needed any more or eventually die. Just because they don't test things on humans, doesn’t mean that they should be doing it to animals. Animals testing is harmful to innocent animals.

People can die due to store bought products being dangerous. With the help of animal testing these people can be saved. Animal testing is a series of experiments used to help save lives. Animal testing is used to find out if cosmetics, cleaners, and many other things are safe for human lives. If animal testing never happened more people would not be as safe. Because of animal testing many innocent lives have been saved. Animal testing is a very effective way to ensure product safety and should not be banned.

Because of animal testing, we have multiple life-saving cures and vaccines such as a vaccine for Hepatitis B (ProCon.org, 2016). Another sound reason for animal testing is that animals are similar to us; in fact, chimps and mice have a close DNA match to humans (ProCon.org, 2016). Not to mention, animals are a more suitable alternative than human test subjects when the tests could put a human in danger (ProCon.org, 2016). It is preferred to harm the animals than the humans. Another positive aspect of animal testing is that the animals could benefit from the test themselves; as an example, chlamydia vaccines have slowed down koala extinction (ProCon.org, 2016). Moreover, the alternative to animal testing is computer models and cells, but that does not compare to living models because single cells do not show the effect on the body and computers can be accurate if only information from the subject is entered (ProCon.org, 2016). When doing animal testing, it is highly regulated and abide by the standards of AWA (ProCon.org, 2016). In addition, animal testing must occur humanely for the animal’s sake and to ensure reliable results (ProCon.org, 2016). Which is why there are various reasons animal testing is

According to an article by Buzzle, across the globe, new products ranging from drugs for cancer, diabetes, and heart diseases to cosmetic products such as soaps, shampoos, etc., are tested on animals. Even though innocent animals are being used and tested, animal testing should continue because animal testing aids in finding cures for illnesses, not only do humans benefit from animal testing, but animals as well, and even though millions of dollars are being wasted and put into animal testing, the money is used for a good cause. First of all, animal testing has elevated the level of cures for illnesses. For example, animal testing helped make vaccines for countless diseases such as herpes simplex, hepatitis B, polio, rabies, malaria,

Animal testing has led to many life saving cures in humans, as well as animals. They have resulted in beneficial results in humans, as well as animals. Some tests may seem cruel, however the animals are treated somewhat humanely

While it may seem that animal testing is helpful, in reality, animal testing is bad for many reasons. The main reasons of why animal testing is bad is because the tests are unreliable, it's harmful to the animals, and it also wastes time and money.”Animals are not here for us to do as we please with. We are not their superiors, we are their equals. We are their famil. be kind to them.”-Ricky