Animals In Experimentation. This Essay Will Explore The

As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.

Around the world, millions of scientists conduct their studies by testing their research on animals. Many people believe that experimenting on animals is crucial to the advancement of medical discoveries. Studies show however, that animal experimentation is brutal and unnecessary. There are alternatives though: “replacement, reduction, and refinement” (Howard 2).

Ever since the late 1960’s and the early 1970’s, animal research has been under extreme fire for what they do. This is mainly due to the many changing perspectives on the relationship between humans and the other aspects of the world that are surrounding them. There are many main reasons for this change, but the main reason is the different ideas that surrounded the use and exploration of animals in laboratories is what is being brought into question.

Throughout my paper, I felt as though I was able to give a solid and fair representation of the opposing viewpoint on issue of animal testing. However, it was challenging because I strongly oppose animal testing.

Using animals as testing experiments have benefited the world in more ways than one. A few breakthroughs from

Animals suffer just as people do. In 2009 animal experimentation was the cause of over 1.13 million animals, excluding small rodents, suffering in U.S. Laboratories (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service). Animal experimentation is unethical, unnecessary and expensive; alternative methods of testing should be utilized.

Ever since the late sixties and early seventies, animal research has been under fire for what they do. This is mainly due to the changing perspectives on the

From the early beginnings of civilizations, humans have had a symbiont relationship with animals. Animals have allowed humans to make great progression through history, from early farming methods, to transportation, even scientific research. Recently the ethics of the use of animals in scientific research and clinical testing have been a subject of a controversial debate. Animals have been used in scientific research as early as 500 BC (Miziara et al. 2012). One of the most impactful innovations for quality of life since the end of the middle ages has been medicine, drastically improving life spans and reducing child deaths. One of the key sources of medicinal research during this time and to this day are animal models.

Thesis: The debate on whether using animals is the correct choice of method for testing out experiments and products, is still up for discussion, considering that animals have helped us in finding many treatments and cures in the past. Today, with new technology, we no longer need the use of animals, as there are now alternatives to this practice. Companies and labs that originally started out using animals as test subjects are starting to switch over to new alternatives, as they are more accurate compared to the old methods that was used in the past.

Humankind would not be developed and improved without advancement of biosciences and technology. Besides many aspects of life that scientists are working on researching to provide a high-quality life for human beings, public health is one of the main areas. As a matter of fact, scientists have conducted a number of experiments to evaluate side effects of new medicines. As a result, animals are the top testing samples which have brought into many controversies for years about using testing them for scientific purpose. In this essay, the idea of supporting this practice will argue reasons why scientists should use animals for testing.

From 1900 to 1920 Karl Landsteiner discovered the four main blood groups being A, B, AB and O, antibiotics were discovered, the ability to perform corneal transplants became possible and the understanding of hormone systems and how they work increased. In 1920 to 1950, Frederick Banting and Charles Best isolated and successfully used insulin to treat diabetes, Alexander Fleming discovered the penicillin antibiotic, blood groups M and N were discovered and blood transfusions were starting to be implemented. This period also saw discovery of how nerves work and improved anesthetics were developed for surgery. 1950 to 1970 saw the introduction of major new surgeries like organ transplants, joint replacements and the usability of pacemakers. Also, the development of drugs to treat high blood pressure and other certain types of illnesses, understanding of hearing mechanisms and how muscles are controlled, the development of a vaccine for rubella (German measles) and the DNA molecular structure was determined by James Watson and Francis Crick. During the 20 year period from 1970 to 1990 drugs to treat ulcers, asthma and leukaemia were developed, the first lung transplant was performed and drugs were developed to suppress the rejection of transplanted organs, vaccines for certain types of meningitis were developed, and prostaglandins and enkephalins were discovered. Finally in the 1990’s genetic therapy for cystic fibrosis began, electronic implants for the treatment of deafness and muscle paralysis was starting to be used, the first artificial lung transplant was executed and the first animal which happen to be a sheep was cloned from adult cells. The large number of medical breakthroughs over the past century still doesn’t make animal testing ethical in today’s

As society grows with age, it strives to advance in all areas of life. With the turn of the century, a major advancement in all aspects of science, including medicine, is to use laboratory animals to test potentially dangerous substances and research if the substances would be compatible with humans. Many people have issues with animal testing as they believe it is inhumane to use animals to put them in potentially dangerous situations. However, much progress has been made using animal research. The information gained from animal research has paved the road to everything from hair restoration to cancer treatments. Animal research has progressed humanity into new levels it could only dream of and should remain an essential practice.

Animal research is a practice that dates back to ancient Greece used by physician-scientists like Aristotle. One cannot deny that throughout the history of this practice, researchers have treated animals poorly. However, in the modern era of science, researchers understand the poor treatment of animals, is both unethical and counterproductive to advances in science. Scientists now follow guidelines set for what is the fair and humane treatment of animals used in research, as well as when the use of animals is ethical. Undoubtedly, there are times when animal research may seem unjustified as the experiment are not designed to increase mankind’s knowledge in a way that will further improve the world, but these occasions are few and “whenever

The use of animal models for biomedical research has been a widely debated subject for decades. On one side of the argument, animal models are critical components for the development and treatment of human medicine. Without the use of common lab animals, research progress would be slower, and thus more lives would be lost due to the lack of research as it pertains to certain diseases. On the other side of the argument, some believe that it is completely unnecessary for animals to be used in human research, with many people believing that it is a form of animal cruelty and should be treated as such.

The focus of animal research has been characterized by three criteria, The Three R’s. “’The Three Rs’ are reduction, replacement and refinement. Here in the US, research communities are committed to supporting techniques that reduce the number of higher species used, replace animals with other models wherever/whenever possible, and refine tests to ensure the most humane conditions possible.” (Trull 2). Scientists try to keep the animals from being harmed as much as possible.