Ann Griffin's Argumentative Essay

Freddie Watts and Jimmy Brothers were put in a very tough and uncomfortable situation, as principle and vice principal, when Ann Griffin made a racial comment. Watts and Brothers administered a primarily African American school. Ann Griffin is a Caucasian teacher who made a racial remark to the principle, Freddie Watts, and vice principal, Jimmy Brothers, of the school she was administered to. She stated that she, “hated all black folks.” This required them to question her ability to perform her job correctly without having a racial bias towards black students. A decision must be made regarding her removal. Ann Griffin does have the right to free speech however, discrimination could also effect her students in a negative way.

The Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines originated in Iowa in December 1965 when seven Des Moines high school students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. Ultimately they were suspended in which the student’s fathers sued the school district. The court case battled through the District Court, Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court. The ultimate ruling was that Des Moines School District violated the students First Amendment rights. Years later, in Oregon in 1990, teachers a McMinnville High School started a lawful strike and in response, the school district hired replacement teachers. Following, two students wore and distributed buttons and stickers with slogans supporting the strike. The students were suspended which led to the student’s parents suing the school district where the District Court provides a ruling. Similar to Tinker v. Des Moines, Chandler v. McMinnville was ruled that the school violated the students First Amendment rights of the students.

The 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines court case attested the First Amendment privileges of understudies in school. The Court held that a school region abused the students’ freedom of speech rights when it singled out a type of typical discourse – black armbands worn in dissent of the Vietnam War – for denial, without demonstrating the armbands would bring about significant disturbance in class.

Tinker v. Des Moines: The students of a public school in Des Moines Iowa wore black arm bands to protest the vietnam war and they were suspended for disrupting learning. The supreme court ruled 7 to 2 that it was a violation of their first amendment rights and that there was no disruption, This garuntees the right to protest in school as long as it doesn't disrupt learning.

John and Mary Beth Tinker and their friend Chris Eckhardt wore black armbands to school in Des Moines, Iowa, to protest the war in Vietnam. The student refused to take off armbands and then were suspended. Parent sued the school and said it was a violation of their First Amendment. On the ruling the Supreme Court sided with the students said As long as an act of expression doesn't disrupt class work or school activities or invade the rights of others, it's acceptable.

In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, a group of high school students in Des Moines, Iowa wanted to show their opposition to the deployment of U.S. troops in Vietnam, and decided to wear black armbands during the holiday season. The school system found out about the student’s plan to wear black armbands, so the principals of the Des Moines schools adopted a policy that required students to remove the armbands or be suspended until the student would return to school without the band. Several students, including John Tinker, wore armbands and were suspended from school. As told by the United States Courts, the parents of the suspended students sued the school district because they believed the school district violated the students rights to free speech. The parents lost in the Court of Appeals, and went to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of the students on February 24, 1969, because, “Students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school gates.” (United States Courts)

In conclusion, I believe that everyone makes mistakes, and I don’t believe that a person should be fired because of comments that they make. No one knows the circumstance of people’s life’s that have taken them to say what they say. The teacher on the scenario could have been raped at young age by a black person. Who knows? We don’t know also, how the administrators started the conversation with her to take her to an extremity to say what she said. I understand it is wrong, and that is when they should be counseled and proper disciplined. We are not robots, and we just have to be careful, and control our political, race, or religion opinions and keep to ourselves, and don’t judge the kids or co-worker by whatever their choices are. Be a devil’s advocate and outsider and concentrate in what is the best for the kids. In the case of Bob

The Richmond Planet took its first aggressive stance against the termination of African American School Principals. The

It was something June did without much thought, more on whim than on logic. She knows that her dye job isn't particularly good, and her brown roots are still visible. But, June was satisfied with the end results.

Therefore, the principle may not force Anthony to stand for the national Anthem or condemn Beth for “acting her faith.” In conclusion, if the school district continues with Beth’s suspension, they would be violating her rights to express her feelings. Opposers may state that Beth’s reasons were not clear as she protested, and because of the “material and disruption test”, Beth’s speech was not protected. However, Beth clarified her reasons to the principal and her student peers before they came to their conclusions. Ergo, just as Anthony’s actions are protected under our law, so should Beth’s as they took the same actions.

Mr. Kowalski you handled ethical dilemma when you went outside to help to Sue and her family. You were not scared of losing your life. You saved Sue’s life and gave your life for her. I agree with you when you said the violence with gangsters was not going to stop. Now I understand why you said that because it need it to end the way it did so justice came come in and take them. Mr. Kowalski you were killed and the violent gang were taking to Jail. That was the only way the violent would of stop.

Freedom of speech is a constitutional right that all of us hold dear, everyone uses it daily or not at all in some cases. Teachers however use it just as much, and there have been quite a few court cases establishing what rights to free speech teachers have. Examining the pros and cons of this situation regarding Ann Griffin was dismissed based on concerns from a statement regarding African-Americans and how the court should rule in this case. In the first proof the argument for her dismissal on the basis that she would not be able to treat others fairly based on what she said. Secondly, being that she would not be able to work effectively with her colleagues. On the other spectrum of the argument, her right to free speech and what are the limits regarding her free speech as a teacher? While finally coming down to her right to an opinion with her free speech in that workspace. Tying together what is ultimately the ruling on her case.

Baker appropriately censored Elizabeth’s speech because Elizabeth’s speech posed the possibility to disrupt the entire school, and did disrupt a class. Speech may be censored if the speech either, materially or substantially disrupts classwork, or if there is a potential for such disruption. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 513 (1969). In Tinker, students wearing black armbands in school to protest the Vietnam War were suspended. Tinker, 393 U.S. at 504. The Court held that the high school violated the student’s First Amendment rights because there was neither evidence of a material or substantial disruption nor evidence of a potential for disruption. Elizabeth’s speech did have the potential to materially or substantially disrupt the school, and caused an actual disruption in a nearby math class. R-61. Therefore, her First Amendment rights were not violated when Ms. Baker censored her speech.

On a sunday of August, the 28th of 2005 a hurricane was coming toward Armani and her family, and friends. Armani Curtis, the protagonist was upset because not all of her friends could come to her birthday party, where she would be turning ten years old. Double Digits!! She was really proud of this. On the morning of Armani’s birthday, after her birthday breakfast her grandma asked if she could talk to Armani’s parents in private. Armani heard through the walls of her house and she heard her grandma say, “Maybe we should cancel the party,,,” Armani, not liking this idea at all, jumps up and runs into the kitchen, and whined, “Please don’t cancel my party!” She was so upset that her grandma who she loved and trusted a lot would suggests such

It has been obvious that Amanda Stanton and Josh Murray are doing great on Bachelor in Paradise this season. Amanda has been spotted out with him more than once since the show ended and they haven't been hiding the fact that they are a couple. Now they are taking it as far as to speak out to Us Magazine and share that they are already living together. Nobody will be wondering if Amanda decides he is the one for her anymore.