Annabel Lee And The Necklace Comparison Essay

Willa Cather's Paul's Case and Maupassant's The Necklace When comparing two fictional characters from two different writers one must first and foremost analyze their dreams, ambitions, or goals in the story. Whether the character is setting out to accomplish something physically, or they are on a personal or spiritual quest to find themselves. A character's ambitions can reveal a lot of underlying qualities that may not be as apparent at first glance from the reader. While

In The Necklace the woman lost her friend’s “expensive” necklace. The loss of this necklace caused her and her husband to live in major debt when they decided to buy her another one just like it to replace it. They worked many jobs for ten years and she lost her beauty and health. When she saw her friend again she was told the necklace

The story intially takes place at a ball that Madame Louisel has been invited to by her husband. In the beginning of the story Madame is very indecisive about making an appearance at the ball. She complained she did not have a dress, any jewels, and she was scared she would look like a "pauper"(174). She did not want to look poor around a bunch of rich woman, so she had asked a friend for a piece of jewelry to wear for the night. Excited, she picks out the diamond necklace that seemed to stand out to her. She adored it. The narrator describes it as "lovliest of all, elegant, smiling, and radiating with joy"(175). Having a blast at the party, dancing, drinking, and not thinking about anything else, Madame left the ball around four in the morning. Calling a cab, Madame and her husband were on their way home, delighted with the fun night that they had. Finally arriving at home, they begin to get into comfortable clothes when suddenly Madame notices that the diamond necklace she had borrowed from a friend for the night had gone missing. Searching everyhwere

Within the necklace there is multiple ironic things that happen. The three main ironic things are when she had bought a real necklace, the other necklace was fake and she had never know that it was fake, also when they search her dress to look for the necklace to look for it, and she knows that she was not the one who had sold the necklace.

‘The Necklace’ is a morality tale written by Guy de Maupassant where he portrays the life of a beautiful but dissatisfied girl named Mathilde who desires to live a luxurious life despite being born into a clerk’s family and marrying a clerk too. Mathilde’s discontentment in life instigates her to pretend someone rich that she is not. Moreover, it leads her to severe trouble that caused ten years of hardship to Mathilde and her husband. So, this suffering is a punishment for Mathilde which taught her a lesson and changed her dramatically over the course of the story by making her a person of completely different personality for whom appearances

The road to happiness is not having everything, but it is being the best you can be. “The Necklace” is about a character named Mathilde, who is selfish and wants to have much more than she actually needs. Throughout the story, Mathilde’s actions change based on her financial conditions. First, when Mathilde is first presented to the readers she is sad, suffering inside, she undervalues her house, her food, her life in general. From Mathilde’s perspective, she is very poor and has no money to have the fancy clothing and jewels she would like to have.

The necklace “ She suffered endlessly, feeling herself born for every delicacy and luxury”. Mathilde had a strong yearning for luxurious and exquisite items. Mathilde's downfall was greatly influenced by her want for expensive items, because it led her to losing the necklace, and caused her to waste ten years of her life trying to pay it off. Mathilde's yearning for wealth and social status, not fate, brought about her downfall.

In The Necklace, Guy De Maupassant creates a suffering tone. He uses diction to further describe words and give better meaning to his statements, irony to tie the story together and give dramatic surprises, and imagery to show you what Mathilde (the wife) is dreaming of our talking about. He uses all of these literary devices to support the tone that is created throughout the story.

In the play The Necklace, the story of a beautiful and charming woman is told. This woman married an average man who she felt she was much too good for. Mathilde believed she was much more suited for a wealthy man with a luxurious lifestyle, not Claude the clerk. Claude was content with his ordinary life and found pleasure in the small things. Mathilde took Claude for granted and became increasingly irritated by him. She failed to notice all the good things he did for her, and he put up with it. She complained about having to do housework and never being able to go out and live an extravagant life. Claude listened to these complaints and managed to get them tickets to a ball. Rather than being thankful, Mathilde complained more about her lack of a dress nice enough for the ball. Claude saved up and got enough to buy her an elegant dress to wear, but Mathilde complained about not having any accessories to match. Claude proposed the idea that she could wear a flower, but Mathilde instead borrowed a diamond necklace from her wealthy friend Jeanne and promised to bring it back. She lost this necklace at the ball and, rather than confessing to Jeanne what had

Around the world, values are expressed differently. Some people think that life is about the little things that make them happy. Others feel the opposite way and that expenses are the way to live. In Guy de Maupassant’s short story, “The Necklace”, he develops a character, Madame Loisel, who illustrates her different style of assessments. Madame Loisel, a beautiful woman, lives in a wonderful home with all the necessary supplies needed to live. However, she is very unhappy with her life. She feels she deserves a much more expensive and materialistic life than what she has. After pitying herself for not being the richest of her friends, she goes out and borrows a beautiful necklace from an ally. But as she

The necklace serves as a symbol for greed. When Mathilda Loisel loses the necklace that she believed was worth forty thousand francs, she desperately retraces her steps and gets her husband to help her find it as well. It ends up taking ten years to pay off the debt. The ten years were hard on Mathilda Loisel and her husband, and Maupassant told the reader that she “looked old now… with hair half combed, with skirts award, and reddened hands” (6). However, even after the long ten years of manual labor all because she lost the necklace, she “sat down near the window and though of that evening at the ball so long ago, when she has been so beautiful and so admired” (6). The necklace symbolizes that when greed controls emotions and decisions, it never leads to good results.

They leave in a rush because Mathilde doesn't want the other ladies to her in a "modest, everyday wrap" while they were wearing expensive furs. When they arrive home they realize the necklace is gone, so they retrace their steps trying to find it. When they have no luck, they buy the necklace for thirty-six thousand francs borrowing every cent from people. They spend ten years repaying everything back including interest. When it is over, Mathilde confesses to her friend and receives the shocking news that the necklace was costume jewelry and only worth a mere 500 francs at most.

Losing the necklace at the party, Mathilde panics and decides not to tell Mrs. Forrestier that she does not have her necklace anymore. With her pride at an all-time high from the successful party Mathilde does not want to admit she made a mistake, and thinks of a way to solve her problems while keeping her pride intact. Insisting she will replace the necklace, Mathilde and her husband borrowed enough money to pay for an identical necklace from a local jeweler, landing themselves in a large amount of debt. “Mrs. Loisel soon discovered the horrible life of the needy. She did her share, however, completely, heroically. That horrifying debt had to be paid. She would pay” (Maupassant, 12). The Loisel’s moved from their home and both worked to repay their loans, at many times struggling to continue in their financial situation. Mathilde learned what poverty and work was actually like, and changed dramatically. Her appearance declined rapidly, but to replace her good looks came a hardworking traits and a thankful personality. “Life is so peculiar, so uncertain. How little a thing it takes to destroy you or to save you!” (Maupassant, 12). Without the loss of the necklace Mathilde would have never learned that pride is not about who you appear to be, but who you actually are, transforming her pride into her greatest strength at the end of her life.

Throughout the story the title "The Necklace" becomes several other symbols, for example when Mathilde loses the necklace and makes the decision to be dishonest, the necklace becomes a symbol of Mathilde's greed and the severe consequences that came with it. After all, the necklace is the reason why Mathilde's life went into extreme poverty and unhappiness.

Mr. Loisel was obviously excited the day that The Chancellor of Education had invited them to an exquisite dinner. Surely he thought that this was finally a way that he could provide an outlet for Mathilde's deepest desires. Unfortunately, instead of being thrilled as he had predicted, Mathilde acted like a spoiled child, throwing the invitation on the table. "She had no decent dresses, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but these; she believed herself born only for these" (5). She couldn't have been more manipulative than when she began to cry about not having anything to wear. Of course Mr. Loisel suddenly fell into her trap and suddenly decided to give her all of the money in his savings account to buy her a new dress. Most would assume that she'd be satisfied at this point; her husband has just made a huge financial sacrifice for her. However, as time drew near to the night of the party, she became insecure and restless because she thought she would look poor if she didn't have any fancy jewels to wear; she thought she'd look like a beggar. `I'd almost rather not go to the party (30)", she said.