Annotated Bibliography On Animal Testing

This is an annotated bibliography of animal testing and if it’s morally justified. There are many opinions on the results and the entire process that it takes to test a cosmetic product or a medicine on an animal. There are many alternatives and benefits to animal testing but is it really justified? Or are animals in potential danger.

Nancy Day talks about the two unique perspectives of the generally discussed subject of creature testing and altogether discusses the results of creature testing and experimentation and furthermore the advantages we pick up and expand upon. Staying nonpartisan, she gives the pursuer a decent opportunity to see where both sides are originating from additionally giving many motivations to reject the other so that no inclination is affecting the pursuer’s sentiment. Implied for any one, mindful of this level headed discussion or not, she clears the reality this issue has been overstated and is undoubtedly influencing our day by day lives regular. This book has a fundamental motivation behind giving the pursuer some data about what is going on with the goal that they can choose for themselves which side in this warmed debate to take. This two sided pugnacious source gives an alternate bend and draws in the pursuer to an unceasing fight while alternate sources are exceptionally uneven and straightforwardly tending to the solid contradiction toward creature testing. Before perusing this book I would quickly blame the creature experimenters for such superfluous savagery and abuse yet after some exhaustive exploring, I found that there are a few advantages for creature

The author emphasizes in biological difference between human beings and animals meaning drugs safe for animals might not be safe for humans. It argues that the FDA should not mandate animal testing and should look to the alternative methods for evidence that supports drug approval. Author suggests many alternative methods other then animal testing that can make drugs more efficient and safe for human use, consequently saving animals from experimental cruelty which provides excellent quotations for the research paper.

As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.

Around the world, millions of scientists conduct their studies by testing their research on animals. Many people believe that experimenting on animals is crucial to the advancement of medical discoveries. Studies show however, that animal experimentation is brutal and unnecessary. There are alternatives though: “replacement, reduction, and refinement” (Howard 2).

understand benefits of animal use and know that whether a person wants it or not animal

In discussion of animal rights, one controversial issue has been whether or not animals should be use for medical testing. On the one hand, some scientists argue that animal testing has contributed for many cures and treatments. On the other hand, animal rights activist contends that alternative methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. Others even maintain that animal testing is an essential part in medical research. My own view is that animals should not be used in medical testing because is no longer necessary now there are methods that are safer and have better results than animals do.

Aziz, T., & Stein, J. (2011). Animal testing: TV or not TV? Two views on whether scientists

Tessa Connors- Animal Testing Speech Bibliography http://www.peta.org/ISSUES/ANIMALS-USED-FOR-EXPERIMENTATION/ANIMAL-TESTING-101/ ANNOTATION; This website helped me to understand the true reality of animal testing. How serious it is, and the statistics of how many animals are effected. I felt that this website was useful by the way it effectively describes the types of testing that occur. It helped me to develop ideas on solutions and what the public can do to end animal testing.

Many of us are unaware of the sheer number of animals that undergo constant suffering in the name of human vanity. Animal testing was originally introduced in the early 20th century and is still prominent today. It is morally unacceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes. The procedures used in animal testing are cruel and inhumane, nor are they the most reliable source of data; resulting in many mishaps. Moreover, with the perpetual advancements in technology, there are several alternative methods making animal testing unnecessary. If testing cosmetics and drugs on humans is unacceptable, what makes it acceptable to test on animals?

Animal testing is an old fashioned way of testing medications and products to ensure that they are safe for humans. It is a way to further our society, without inflicting any harm to our race, but in today's society, it is no longer a required option for testing. For one, it is very cruel to animals. We should not be self involved and only think about ourselves. The world cannot survive that way. We need animals in the world, and if we continue treating them in this harmful manner they will no longer be able to provide for the world’s environment. Also, animal testing has been proven to not be as effective as people may think. In the Baltimore Sun writer Kelly Overton claims that “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials.” This demonstrates that animal testing is no longer required in today’s society. We have better ways to test with new technology, instead of with animal testing that has been proven to be highly ineffective. Overall, in the past animal testing may have been needed to save

Stated by Mahatma Gandhi, “The greatness of the nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated”. Medical research on animals is an effective way for scientist to test different medical discoveries and experiment before using them on humans to check their result. This technique has been used for centuries dating back to people such and Aristotle and Erasistratus. What exactly is medical research on animals? When we take a deeper look into the experiment that are preformed we can conclude that animals are a living model of humans in these laboratories. It is a necessity to harm and test animals with new drugs in order to market them in the medical industry to aid human illnesses. In order to better comprehend and regulate drugs one must understand what medical research on animals is described as and its benefits to pharmaceutical companies for humans. Exposure to the trials and tribulations that animal testing reveals how important it is for scientists to understand the negative effects they contribute to an animal’s welfare and life. In contrary animal testing has been used to save many human lives from consuming or using a drug that could have caused them life threatening illnesses.

In recent years, news reports and articles feature stories in which animals are harmed in animal testing and even killed once a research study is terminated. Many articles have argued back and forth about animal testing and trying to come up with an answer whether animal testing is ethical. The controversy over animal testing is best understood as a disagreement over whether animal testing creates more harm than good for animals in laboratories across the nation. A recent milestone in the animal testing controversy was when finally the truth was discovered that animal fat was found in blush. One view of this controversy is that Testing on animals does not benefit humans or the animals being probed in laboratories. Another view of this animal testing controversy is that testing on animals is extremely beneficial to humans as it helps us advance in the medical field faster than we would with actual humans. Stakeholders in this debate are Animal activists who believe in (“Animal liberation”). Animals regaining their freedom from becoming imprisoned in laboratories, Animals, scientists and people who believe testing animals is necessary to advance in the medical field. The main question that all the stakeholders are trying to wrap their heads around is, “ Is animal testing necessary to advance in the medical field?

Animals are being used as “models” for studying human effects on various products. They are test subjects for developing drugs, antibiotics, and vaccines. These experiments are performed in order to improve human well-being without putting humans in any kind of danger. Some believe that animal testing is justified because humans have ultimate superiority over animals. They insist that major medical breakthroughs have occurred by reason to animal testing. Animal testing helps ensure the safety of drugs and developing medicine that humans are regularly exposed to. It has helped develop and improve “cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more (Murnaghan, 2017)”. Other reason that animal testing can be classified as a pro is that it is the best research method when it comes to human similarity. Other alternatives are not as similar to humans. This is beneficial in terms of results. Scientists will gather more accurate results

Medical research benefits humans greatly. In fact, decades of medical studies have made several diseases treatable, such as diabetes, tuberculosis, and malaria; moreover, medical research has prevented diseases altogether. Common for all these developments is animal-testing. While testing on animals is not morally ideal, scientists lack good alternatives. Thus, abandoning animal-testing is premature because medical research needs complex-system test-subjects, and the absence of which can be risky for pharmaceutical consumers.Viewed as inhumane to many, animal testing is not ideal; however, animal experimentation is necessary for the advancement of medicine.