Annotated Bibliography On The Dark Matter

Barry opens his nonfiction text by emphasizing that certainty is a confident resilience while uncertainty produces frailty, but in a way that sends out opposite outcomes. He enhances this purpose by constantly using repetition with the word uncertainty to amplify how scientific research is an uncertain apparatus. By way of illustration,

There is perhaps no current problem of greater importance to astrophysics and cosmology than that of "dark matter". The controversy, as the name implies, is centered on the notion that there may exist an enormous amount of matter in the Universe that cannot be detected from the light that it emits. The evidence of dark matter is from the motions of astronomical objects, specifically stellar, galactic, and galaxy cluster/supercluster observations.

question the reliability of these sources, the nature of the inconsistency between these two articles has

Yes I find it credible. Rich Deem, the author has worked in basic science research for years and is currently working at Cedars-Sinai MC as a researcher/specialist; therefore, he has the experience and documents statistics and credible sources.

Trefil, J., & Hazen, R. M. (2011). The sciences: An integrated approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons,

John M. Barry uses the various different types of rhetorical strategies to characterize scientific research by comparing the opposites of both certainty and uncertainty, by referring to life in the woods as a metaphor towards the mind and creation of science, and a series of rhetorical questions that shows the process and mind of the scientists portrayed in John M Barry’s essay.

+. Science in Context. Web. 23 Nov.2015. Ben-Yehuda, Nachman., and Erich Goode “11.”

“There must be no barriers to freedom of inquiry. There is no place for dogma in science. The scientist is free, and must be free to ask any question, to doubt any assertion, to seek for any evidence, to correct any errors. Our political life is also predicated on openness. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it and that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. And we know that as long as [we] are free to ask what [we] must, free to say what [we] think, free to think what [we] will, freedom can never be lost, and science can never regress.”

The article was posted on 2011, and it hasn’t been update. The information on the website is very short and not so clear. It comes from a .com site.

The universe is the entirety of space, time, matter and energy. Today scientists theorize that the universe is dominated by invisible matter rather than visible matter. What is this mysterious invisible matter that makes up the majority of our universe? Scientists call it dark matter. But other than the fact that exists, scientist know very little about it, and are more certain about what it is not than what it is (Dark Energy, Dark Matter, n.d.).

(2014) using XMM-Newton observations of galaxy clusters. The signal was detected in five independent samples, including observations both of single objects and stacked cluster spectra. Subsequently, the presence of an unidentified line at E~3.52 keV was confirmed by a re-analysis of XMM data of the Perseus cluster, and also reported from an analysis of XMM observations of M31 by Boyarsky et.al. XMM blank-sky observations do not reveal any evidence for any feature at the energy of interest. Furthermore, when detected in clusters, the line is observed to have a redshift consistent with that of the host cluster, helping to rusle out an obvious instrumental

Recently, scientists found the first known evidence of oscillating neutrinos, and have come to believe that they’re getting very close to understanding these bizarre particles.

Dark Matter and Dark Energy are important. They can help us know how the universe began. These two are the mysteries of the universe; they compose about 90% of the universe. They are mysteries because we believe that they exist but we can’t see them or detect them. People question whether they manifest to be the same thing. Astronomers know very little about their constitution so they cannot assume they are related.

Going straight to the source is the best way to check if the information in the article is reliable and credible.

Currently, I have pioneered in using unconventional on-shell interference effects to between signals and background amplitudes to probe new physics. I have identified several critical processes at the LHC and found these interesting on-shell interference effects not only an essential component of the precision programs but also unique probes for BSM physics. What's more, I am working on using angular distributions in boosted $t\bar t$ system at the LHC and proposing new searches for exotic long-lived particle signatures in stop coannihilation DM scenario in the MSSM and a next to minimal dark matter model.