Annotated Bibliography On Why Should Students Get Paid For Good Grades

If students are rewarded for quality schoolwork, grades may initially improve. They may show more excitement. However, in the article “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades” by Amy Mccready, it is found that the enhanced grades deteriorate along with the excitement for the payment. Most children simply lose interest in the reward. It is better to just let youth accomplish

    First off, school requires a mental effort which by definition is considered to be work. Since we go to school for 8 hours every day and do that about 180 days per year, we should get paid if we keep our grades up because it’s hard to do. Keeping good grades requires lots of hard work and effort. It also requires time, which some of us

The general argument made by the author Arianna Prothero in her work ‘Does Paying Kids to Do Well in School Actually Work’ is that paying students for grades only works for students who are already doing well within their classes. Throughout the article, the author was appearing to be neutral about the topic. Prothero uses the statement “the effects are small if even there at all” to emphasize the point about the incentive only working for students who are almost there. These pupils are the students who only need to put in a small amount of work and effort to achieve this reward.

Giving your children money for satisfying grades that they get doesn't benefit them with their career that they will have as adults. Let me back this up. If they get paid for the super grades that they received they will soon have an expectation that everything good that they do they should receive something in return. This makes kids not try to the best of their ability because these children know

The general argument made by Arianna Prothero in her passage, Does Paying Kids to Do Well in School Actually Work, is that incentives, such as paying students to go to school, will improve the way they learn. More specifically, she believes that financial incentives affect students rather than little trinkets or toys. She writes “Incentives are also more likely to work for students who need a little improvement to earn a passing grade.” In this passage, Arianna is suggesting that more schools in the U.S. should start providing incentives but that are designed well or else they will not work. So, does paying kids to do well in school actually work?

The general argument made by author Arianna Prothero in her work, Does Paying Kids To Do Well In School Actually Work? Adults have used bribes or rewards on children for many years to attempt to convince children to try harder in school and even pay children when they do good in school. More specifically, Arianna Prothero argues that educators could leverage students to keep doing good in school by giving them gift cards or scholarship money and even in some cases cold hard cash. She writes, “if you’re miles away from it, no matter how much effort you put in, the odds of reaching are still low, so why bother?”

“Why can’t our hard work have an income?”. Almost all students have had a similar thought at a time in their lives. To them, the incessant striving and vassalage they do for school deserves a salary. However, the situation with the exchange of grades for payment is a problematic state of affairs. In the predicament of schools giving students this opportunity, it will certainly lead to catastrophic events for all parties involved, especially, in the long run. Insightful to the statistics and evidence of both standpoints, school payment for grades is a situation best abstained because it causes quagmires. In agreement with this, say it causes conflicts, it’s only short-term, and causes negative impacts in the long run. By not paying students, you avoid turmoil, cut out a short-term motivator, and allow their future selves a better chance academically.

Realistically the argument made by Ariana Prothero is that paying students might be a good thing, but stylistically it doesn't work in every case. Taking research from an outside source, about an incentive program in college where a man named Roland Fryer put six million dollars into eighteen thousand low income students to try to improve test performance. In the end, the takeaway is that students feel more entitled to have a reward of an output more so than input. Therefore meaning some students, test scores aren't going to improve, because they don't know how to improve them. So students would rather get money after they know what grade they have other than, having a requirement to meet. It's probably way too much pressure for them to have on themselves.

Carol Dweck is a psychology professor at Stanford University who recently conducted an experiment on how students receive appraisal. This is what she found,

Claim: schools should pay kids for good grades. It's important because they will get interested in school. Kids should get paid for good grades because they will start to get more interested in school classes, in Texas to Massachusetts, a growing number of students pocketing cash for good grades or advanced test scores and Sat exams, don't you guys want your kids to subside in school? And in life?(NEA website)

What would happen if students are paid? If schools truly want students to learn they shouldn’t pay students for good grades. Paying students for their grades can lead to lower academic performances. In addition, the students who are getting payed will dampen their natural enthusiasm for learning. It also gives kids unneeded pressure extra pressure. Paying students for good grade is a bad idea because they will have lower academic performances, their enthusiasm will dampen and students will have unneeded extra pressure.

First of all, students should get paid for good grade because the would be a rise in graduation rates. John Hopkins University “ There are also a signified dropout rate when kids aren't getting paid. This leads to students feeling valued for the hard work they do in

Another reason, Parents can motivate students by paying them for having excellent grades and excellent behavior. Well you might be asking yourself how does money benefit students? Well it motivate teens to maintain high grades. And it can actually help them in the future for example for college. Another question you might have is how much should i paid my student? Well most parents paid students $20 for each A

Should we pay children for achieving good grades? In my essay I aim to give you all the positives and negatives of the above subject. My personal opinion is, of course, students should be paid, as my belief is that we would concentrate more in school - I will however leave that outcome up to you. If students in St. Andrew’s and many other school across Scotland and the U.K were to be paid for better grades, they will want to do better in school.

Have you ever been wondered why us kids don't get paid for getting perfect grades?! I bet you have, and if you havent, then start wondering. Just imagine how rich you would be as a 10 year old just because you have straight A’s. Trust me, when you're done reading this, you'll agree with me. And if you're an adult have a flashback when you didn't get paid even though you're grades were perfection when you were a pre-teen. Life was a challenge. But if we get paid everything will change. Kids should get paid for getting good grades. They should get paid to for reasons such as, (1) kids will learn more in classes, (2) they won't have to be held back, and(3) if they get paid they will want to get the money, so they'll work hard for it.