Anthropology

After answering the above question, show in the space below, under the heading References, how you would reference list the information in compliance with APA style rules as a reference (an article listing that would be attached to the end of one’s writing if one were using the article .

Here is the section of the style guide that might help you with your citations.

Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.

they perform the bulk of their work, and what it is they do in both problem

Summarize: Write a summary of the article that represents its argument and concerns as accurately as possible.

In the course, I also acquired the necessary citation formatting used in academic writing, such as APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and Turban. However, the course concentrates more on MLA referencing style. To avoid plagiarism or to acknowledge the work done by other authors, English 1101 taught me to identify all the phrases, ideas, quotations or images from someone else’s work, and cite them accordingly. According to

This formal citation is what you will use for your reference page in your Week 5 essay.)

Integrate the quotation into the passage as if the passage is a sentence in your research paper. Include appropriate transitions as well as APA-formatted in-text citations and reference. Delete elements of the passage or quotation as needed.

Summary: Summarize the important aspects of the reading section in a minimum of five sentences. Use main points only, avoid including your personal opinions, and use attributive tags:

This section explains the three moves in a research paper. The three moves can be said as "Establishing a research territory, Establishing a niche and Occupying the niche" (Swales & Feak, 2012). Discussing section is the second section which gives an idea regarding how to write the final part of a research paper. There are methods which can be used to write the final part of a paper. Generally, words like conclusions, results and discussions are used to write the conclusion of a research paper. This section also includes the structure and the limitations made in discussion section, making it the most prominent factor of a research paper. Inclusion of scope in a title is compulsory and it should be easily explained and the title need to be specific with respect to the topic chosen for writing a research paper. The fourth section describes how to write an abstract of a research paper. Abstract plays an important role in constructing a

This is a single paragraph, no indentation is required. The next page will be an abstract; “a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the article; it allows the readers to survey the contents of an article quickly” (Publication Manual, 2010). The length of this abstract should be 35-50 words (2-3 sentences). NOTE: the abstract must be on page 2 and the body of the paper will begin on page 3.

g. Explanation of the central points from the article(s): Avoid just using a quote from a source. Explain what you think the author means.

Please also review the material on summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting material set forth in Keys, p. 122-25.

Boas’ reliance on empirical data to formulate theories underscores Kuhn’s central idea that paradigms are only changed through examination of new data. As data on cultures preceding Boas was slim at best, it is not hard to see how Boas could acquire data contrary to the existing viewpoint. This data collection itself was a new theory, the new invention required. Kuhnian thought states that preparadigmatic schools emphasize the collection of the facts, as Boas was emphasizing. Crisis within the paradigm is witnessed by the competition between the schools of thought. Emerging from this crisis is Boasian anthropology, with its reliance on empirical data as the basis for study. This data collection is subdivided into the four subfields Boas saw as a requirement for this new field. The four-field approach emerges as the dominant force in anthropology. With this approach the community changes its view of the field, and produces new methods and goals. These methods and goals have been used as a professional consensus in anthropology since the Boasian transformation.

Since the emergence of anthropology in the late 1800’s, the customs and methods of this academic discipline have been altered in many ways. It is assumed that in the early years of anthropology, theorists relied on travelers in order to articulate their theories (Dahl 2017). This practice is known as armchair anthropology and involves creating theories without any fieldwork. Some examples of famous armchair anthropologists include Edward Burnett Tylor and James Frazer. The work of both theorists involved no travelling or conducting of fieldwork. Early anthropology focused on primitive cultures and how societies transformed from being barbaric to civilized. In modern days, anthropology is discovering new topics to study every day and the information relies a great amount on fieldwork and lab work conducted by anthropologists to support their findings. As some of the early methods of anthropology continue to be used by anthropology, more are being developed in order to produce more efficient research and theories.